Originally Posted by jojo
The preponderance of the evidence says Auburn is clean. The NCAA addressed this issue specifically. Your argument ignores the most important evidence and gives tremendous weight to things that have either been discredited of contradict established fact.
Wrong. Evidence exists outside of the NCAA investigation. In fact, the NCAA may be the worst arbiter of guilt.
Speaking of hand-waving. Facts include two separate incidents of players admitting to illegal activities to two legitimate reporting outfits. I do not care that these players are not willing to corroborate this information after initial publication. I can only imagine the outside pressure they experience after voicing this unpopular account. How do you explain to yourself that those closest to the situation, multiple ex-players, have admitted to wrongdoing?