Originally Posted by Slyder
He shouldn't have to rent it in the first place, it should still be his.
No question, but this still sounds fishy to me. There's no guarantee that the daughter will sell the house to him for any price. Given his age, I wouldn't be surprised if the house is never bought back from the daughter and if it is it surely won't be put in his name. Seems to me this disfunctional family just made over $100G.