Re: 5/22/2013 Reds at Mets Matinee
Originally Posted by Sea Ray
I will say the ump was in position and had a great look at it. Being a slowly hit ball, I can't imagine he missed it but the same can be said for Ike Davis
Davis has to field that ball no matter what the umpire rules. He can't assume its going foul. Usually those types of rollers are called foul but in this case it wasn't and Davis paid for it. I could never tell what it was. Not a good TV angle was ever shown. Like someone else says Davis looks defeated. He's just totally lost in the field and the plate. It wouldn't surprise me if the Mets release him any day now.
Reds Fan Since 1971