Originally Posted by RedEye
Here's the language of the site rules that I feel are continuously violated by unfounded PED speculation:
"Itís encouraged that you have opinions, but you should be able to back them up before convincing others."
To me, backing up steroid accusations with the following does not constitute "backing up an argument":
1) perceived statistical spikes in performance
2) before/after pictures
3) guilt by association (Molina was in StL when TLR was there and TLR managed a lot of steroid users)
How about we just don't feed the fire rather than get draconian?
The board has enough rules without adding rules to rules, IMO