Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by BillDoran
So an "exhaustive investigation" by what most deem to a corrupt body works for you, while a medical opinion does not.
Seems to me someone may adjust their standards of credibility as to satisfy their own desires. But that's just my opinion, though I'm sure that doesn't level with the scrutiny at which you apply to all things that don't suit your prerogative.
Again, I'm simply looking for evidence as to why I should not trust these doctors. Until you can provide that, I'll go ahead and trust the trained physicians. And must you resort to snide commentary at the end of each post? Let's be adults.
Again it's silly to argue equivalency in this instance. Its a huge tell that exposes bias and motivation to argue that a university that needs to reduce scholarships medically booting a player that another university apparently thinks is fit to play is above reproach while an NCAA investigation is inherently untrustworthy.
You've had your chance to use this as an opportunity to post your thought about me in your "attempt at civil discussion". You're now on ignore.
"This isnít stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner