Re: Clarence Thomas: Judges should be evaluated by God, not Constitution
Clarence Thomas is not allowed to voice his opinion?
Did Mr Thomas administer to the swearing in of these new judges? No.
Is it a law in this country that a judge must swear an oath to God? No.
Did Mr Thomas say it should be a law? No.
It's Clarence Thomas' opinion. And since the man is a Christian, and people like you RF have a perception problem and paranoia about people in this great nation of ours who do advocate a belief in God, it's understandable that you would try to make something out of nothing in all of this.
To swear an oath/allegiance To God (Jesus) means to serve people. It's inseparable in the eyes/minds of a vast majority of Christians. It's not some blind loyalty to some impersonal God who doesn't give a hoot or care about His creation.
Jesus said "I came not to be served, but to serve", and his ministry proved that. That's why Jesus advocated such silly philosophies like "love your neighbor", the parable of the Good Samaritan, etc, etc.
No one can say they serve God, and then not serve people. And Mr Thomas was not advocating anything to the contrary IMO.
"panic" only comes from having real expectations