Re: Freel as "utility" man
Originally Posted by Betterread
I agree. Freel is an offensive player who lacks the necessary fielding ability to play one position consistently. He's still very valuable to the team as a temporary backup and fill-in.
That might mean something except the Reds only have defensive liabilities at 2B. When the options are Rich Aurilia and Tony Womack, Ryan Freel becomes a real easy option.
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong
I'm witchcrafting everybody.