Originally Posted by Austin Kearns
Culpepper was not and still is not worth Palmer. We can both agree on that 100%.
My only argument is that Culpepper's value was more than a 2nd round pick at the beginning of the year, thus the trade that went down is not really a great indicator of his value at the time of the debate.
The debate didn't take place at the beginning of the year. It took place 5 games into it after he looked horrible.
But you and I have no disagreement. I agree with everything you wrote above. It just amazed me the folks who thought Culpepper had more value than Palmer as of mid October 2005.