Here's another way to look at this. Even though I think that last year was disappointing for Wilson, I think he was comparable to Jimmy Haynes.
Starts: Haynes 34, Wilson 30
Innings: Haynes 196.2, Wilson 193.2
Quality Start Percentage: Haynes 50%, Wilson 46.7
Hits/9 inning: Haynes 9.61, Wilson 10.18
Walk/9 inning: Haynes 3.71, Wilson 3.11
Strikeouts/9 inning: Haynes 5.77, Wilson 5.16
Haynes had a little more run support, a lot better defense behind him, and some good luck. Otherwise, their records would have been closer.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Wilson was signed for quite a bit less than Haynes.
How, then, are those people of the future—who are taking steroids every day—going to look back on baseball players who used steroids? They're going to look back on them as pioneers. They're going to look back at it and say "So what?" - Bill James, Cooperstown and the 'Roids