Turn Off Ads?
Page 38 of 68 FirstFirst ... 2834353637383940414248 ... LastLast
Results 556 to 570 of 1007

Thread: Scoreboard Watching 2013

  1. #556
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Beltway View Post
    Chapman's K/9 went from 12.0 in the minors to 14.3 in the majors. Rosenthal's K/9 went from 9.2 in the minors to 11.8 in the majors. I fail to see the problem.
    I agree. Rosenthal actually went through the league for a first time last season, so this is his second or third time facing most teams. He had a bit of a hiccup to start the season, but has adjusted well. He may not keep up his K rate, but he's the one young Cardinal pitcher who I think has a chance of keeping up his production all season.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #557
    Member VR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    9,925

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Beltway View Post
    Chapman's K/9 went from 12.0 in the minors to 14.3 in the majors. Rosenthal's K/9 went from 9.2 in the minors to 11.8 in the majors. I fail to see the problem.
    Chapman 100 innings, Rosenthal 300 innings in the minors. Striking out 1.5 per inning is who Chapman is. Striking out 1 per inning is who Rosenthal is.
    Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand

  4. #558
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by VR View Post
    Chapman 100 innings, Rosenthal 300 innings in the minors. Striking out 1.5 per inning is who Chapman is. Striking out 1 per inning is who Rosenthal is.
    I think that's a bit deceptive to be honest. Rosenthal started in the minors at 19 years old and wasn't the polished pitcher Chapman was when he entered the Reds minor league system. It also says nothing about the Cardinals making him using his secondary pitches a lot in the minors instead of throwing his fastball constantly. They do that with a lot of their young pitchers and was a reason why, for example, Miller's minor league numbers don't look too impressive. Even if Rosenthal regresses to a 9 K/9, that still represents a quality reliever.

  5. #559
    Member Magdal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tn.
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    MLB is in a quandary over this mess. But that's what you get when you schedule these interleague games during the rainy season. It's possible that they might erase the 9th inning and give the Cards the win. (because there may not be another off day for both teams that is not a travel day for 1 or both)

    3 hrs and counting in this delay....nobody left in the stands. The poor Royals have to travel....Oy, what a mess. It's still raining pretty good, with plenty of clouds heading in.

    I may start believing in this Cardinal luck factor thing.

  6. #560
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    It's official. Royals win 4-2.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  7. Likes:

    redsmetz (05-31-2013)

  8. #561
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    12,908

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Magdal View Post
    MLB is in a quandary over this mess. But that's what you get when you schedule these interleague games during the rainy season. It's possible that they might erase the 9th inning and give the Cards the win. (because there may not be another off day for both teams that is not a travel day for 1 or both)

    3 hrs and counting in this delay....nobody left in the stands. The poor Royals have to travel....Oy, what a mess. It's still raining pretty good, with plenty of clouds heading in.

    I may start believing in this Cardinal luck factor thing.
    I think by rule they would have had to finish the game, whether tonight or with the Royals coming back to finish it out.

    I woke up early this morning and was totally confused when I brought up the Cardinals site and it was showing the game still going (with no mention of an interminable rain delay!). Saw your note and then the time and was even more baffled. I went to the Royals site - same thing. I went to the St. Louis and KC papers' sites, no clear indication that the game had resumed. I finally went to Twitter and typed in "cardinals rain delay" and finally saw a tweet that it had ended.

    Thankful that the Royals pulled out a win on a night when we got thrashed. Glad to not lose any more ground. Now let's get back on that pony and take it to the Pirates.
    “In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field"

    The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things.

    The Baseball Bookstore

    http://tsc-sales.com/
    http://tscsales.blogspot.com/
    http://silverscreenbooks.com/

  9. #562
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Magdal View Post
    MLB is in a quandary over this mess. But that's what you get when you schedule these interleague games during the rainy season. It's possible that they might erase the 9th inning and give the Cards the win. (because there may not be another off day for both teams that is not a travel day for 1 or both)

    3 hrs and counting in this delay....nobody left in the stands. The poor Royals have to travel....Oy, what a mess. It's still raining pretty good, with plenty of clouds heading in.

    I may start believing in this Cardinal luck factor thing.
    Well, if MLB can make the 9th inning of the Royals/Reds game disappear, then maybe they make the 4th inning of the Reds/Indians game disappear
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  10. #563
    Member Beltway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    613

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by VR View Post
    Chapman 100 innings, Rosenthal 300 innings in the minors. Striking out 1.5 per inning is who Chapman is. Striking out 1 per inning is who Rosenthal is.
    Yeah...I'm gonna disagree with you here. This is confirmation bias. You're accepting data that supports your position and ignoring data that doesn't. Chapman is better than Rosenthal. Let's leave it at that.

  11. #564
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by VR View Post
    Rosenthal has been a 9K/9 guy in his career.......in the minors. Does anyone really think he will continue at that pace the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th time through the league? Really?
    As a reliever, why not? Not unexpected to see an uptick in K-rate when you go from starter to reliever.

  12. #565
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Magdal View Post
    MLB is in a quandary over this mess. But that's what you get when you schedule these interleague games during the rainy season. It's possible that they might erase the 9th inning and give the Cards the win. (because there may not be another off day for both teams that is not a travel day for 1 or both)
    Erasing the 9th inning was never an option. If they had too, it would have been played at the end of the season. The rules do not allow them to simply wash it away when the Royals took the lead.

  13. #566
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    But the improvement has been Maness taking over Motte's innings.......
    How could that be an improvement?

  14. #567
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    How could that be an improvement?
    I meant Boggs. Oops.

    Both came up the same time, threw hard, and had beards. One was good. I never remembered which one.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  15. #568
    Haunted by walks
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    9,946

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Erasing the 9th inning was never an option. If they had too, it would have been played at the end of the season. The rules do not allow them to simply wash it away when the Royals took the lead.
    There's a new rule about reverting to the last full inning if the game doesn't resume. I don't like going back in time like that. You step on a butterfly, and everything's all messed up when you get back.

  16. #569
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by BCubb2003 View Post
    There's a new rule about reverting to the last full inning if the game doesn't resume. I don't like going back in time like that. You step on a butterfly, and everything's all messed up when you get back.
    I think that's the old rule you are talking about, the new rule is if the away team takes the lead in the last inning, and the home team does not get it's last AB's, the game will be suspended. Once a game is official (5 innings), you never take away a potential winning team's runs.

  17. #570
    Daffy Duck RedTeamGo!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    20,427

    Re: Scoreboard Watching 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeThierry View Post
    I think that's a bit deceptive to be honest. Rosenthal started in the minors at 19 years old and wasn't the polished pitcher Chapman was when he entered the Reds minor league system. It also says nothing about the Cardinals making him using his secondary pitches a lot in the minors instead of throwing his fastball constantly. They do that with a lot of their young pitchers and was a reason why, for example, Miller's minor league numbers don't look too impressive. Even if Rosenthal regresses to a 9 K/9, that still represents a quality reliever.
    I certainly would not describe Chapman when he entered the Reds minor league system "polished." Heck, I don't know if I would describe him as polished at this point in his career.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator