Turn Off Ads?
Page 25 of 26 FirstFirst ... 15212223242526 LastLast
Results 361 to 375 of 390

Thread: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

  1. #361
    Member Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,692
    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    Firstly, you want to focus on the hitter in that situation. Second...Chapman's got a pretty weak move IMO. Risk greater than reward there.
    Not necessarily in that situation, but I'm surprised no one ever tries to catch the runners obviously going on that count.
    They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #362
    5.3 Posts Abv Replacement BluegrassRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Of course this dude would be coming to the plate. Has more inexplicable hits against the Reds since anyone since Theriot.
    Rounding third and heading for home...

  4. #363
    I don't want to grow up Red Raindog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    1,102

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Hoover is in a hurry to end this
    The older I get - the better I was

    and yes - I hate the Cardinals (Reds fan since 1958)

  5. #364
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    8,373

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    And this one belongs to the Reds.
    2014 predictions:
    99-63 WS champs (Cards take 2nd WC, Mil 3rd, Pit 4th, Chi 5th)
    Bruce/Votto neck and neck MVP race (neither takes it)
    Bailey CYA winner
    Hamilton ROY & GG

  6. #365
    Member 1940757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    500

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Go figure. Hoover saves the day after Chapman nearly blew it. Remember this date. That doesn't happen often. Whew. Reds squeak one out. I'll take it!
    Reds & Nats, 2013 LCS. Take2 (9/13) Reds but no Nats

  7. #366
    I don't want to grow up Red Raindog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    1,102

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Hoover --- nice job kid
    The older I get - the better I was

    and yes - I hate the Cardinals (Reds fan since 1958)

  8. #367
    Winning is fun.
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Urbana, OH
    Posts
    805

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Very happy for Hoover.

  9. Likes:

    Red Raindog (05-03-2013)

  10. #368
    Member Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,692
    Ouch! My blood pressure!
    They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.

  11. #369
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    913

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    and a big sigh of relief.

    At least Chapman's bad outing happened when he had 4 runs to play with.

  12. #370
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    8,373

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    Not necessarily in that situation, but I'm surprised no one ever tries to catch the runners obviously going on that count.
    Gotcha. I've seen it occasionally...but rarely
    2014 predictions:
    99-63 WS champs (Cards take 2nd WC, Mil 3rd, Pit 4th, Chi 5th)
    Bruce/Votto neck and neck MVP race (neither takes it)
    Bailey CYA winner
    Hamilton ROY & GG

  13. #371
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,197

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    wow....thot for sure barney was gonna kill us

  14. #372
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    That's just great. Now we have a Closer controversy.
    "I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

    "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread

  15. Likes:

    Red Raindog (05-03-2013)

  16. #373
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    147

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    And we can finally say that this one belongs to the Reds.

  17. #374
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    16,025

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Chapman is so clutch, pitching to the score like that.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  18. Likes:

    _Sir_Charles_ (05-03-2013)

  19. #375
    5.3 Posts Abv Replacement BluegrassRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: 5/3/2013 Reds v. Baby Bears

    Nice showing by Hoover. That's encouraging.
    Rounding third and heading for home...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25