Turn Off Ads?
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 111

Thread: Didi Gregorius

  1. #76
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    15,629

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by *BaseClogger* View Post
    Sure. I don't disagree.

    But based on one month of the 2013 season I'm not ready to say Gregorious is a guy I want for ten years. Lets be a little more patient...
    I don't think anybody's saying that. If you got that impression from me, I apologize. I know Didi's not a .400 hitter

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #77
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,400

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Dang rental player....;p

  4. #78
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    5,090

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by DocRed View Post
    Dang rental player....;p
    Yeah, I like Choo too.

  5. #79
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    280

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    I would have tried to keep Arizona out of the deal and offered the Indians Stephenson, Corcino and Heisey to acquire Choo and Donald. That way we could have held onto Gregorius and had a HUGE insurance policy in case Cozart was struggling, not to mention we could have Didi on the roster. After 2013, we could package Leake and Cozart and get a valuable piece back. With the injury to Ludwick, Stubbs would have hit 8th and played CF, with Choo sliding over to LF. I think Clev would have taken that package without a 2nd thought. Our line up could be:

    Choo
    Gregorius
    Votto
    Phillips
    Bruce
    Frazier
    Mesoraco
    Stubbs

    Cozart
    Hanigan
    Hannahan
    X Paul
    Robinson

  6. #80
    No half measures, Walter RedEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    8,449

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Swagger View Post
    I would have tried to keep Arizona out of the deal and offered the Indians Stephenson, Corcino and Heisey to acquire Choo and Donald.
    How do you know Walt didn't try that? But more importantly -- that seems like an overpay to me. Stephenson and Corcino are a lot to give up just to keep a SS who is already blocked by a solid major leaguer. I think people are overreacting to a few AB's by DiDi. He's not chopped liver, obviously -- but he's not this good either.
    "Iíll kind of have a foot on the back of my own butt. Thatís just how I do things.Ē -- Bryan Price, 10/22/2013

  7. Likes:

    mdccclxix (05-08-2013), remdog (06-08-2013)

  8. #81
    One and a half men Patrick Bateman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    5,967

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Swagger View Post
    I would have tried to keep Arizona out of the deal and offered the Indians Stephenson, Corcino and Heisey to acquire Choo and Donald. That way we could have held onto Gregorius and had a HUGE insurance policy in case Cozart was struggling, not to mention we could have Didi on the roster. After 2013, we could package Leake and Cozart and get a valuable piece back. With the injury to Ludwick, Stubbs would have hit 8th and played CF, with Choo sliding over to LF. I think Clev would have taken that package without a 2nd thought. Our line up could be:

    Choo
    Gregorius
    Votto
    Phillips
    Bruce
    Frazier
    Mesoraco
    Stubbs

    Cozart
    Hanigan
    Hannahan
    X Paul
    Robinson
    That is horrendous value. Both Stephenson and arguably Corcino were in the same class of prospects as Did. He's had like 8 good at-bats and he's A-Rod???!?!

    Okay.

  9. Likes:

    Homer Bailey (05-08-2013), kaldaniels (05-08-2013), marcshoe (05-08-2013), Old school 1983 (05-08-2013), RedEye (05-08-2013), remdog (06-08-2013), Tom Servo (05-08-2013)

  10. #82
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    11,500

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Lets get history straight.

    The Choo trade conversations started when Az asked the Reds about Didi. Az didn't have what the Reds wanted, so Jocketty called around to find a third team who did have the what the Reds wanted, and found Cleveland with Choo. Jocketty had talked to Cleveland about Choo numerous times, but never found a match, until Az entered with their desire to acquire Didi.

    Trade never even gets off the ground without Didi. Period. End of story.
    "Man, the pitch looks fast, even in slow motion." Thom Brennaman on Chapman's fastball.

  11. Likes:

    DocRed (05-08-2013), Homer Bailey (05-08-2013), lollipopcurve (05-08-2013), mdccclxix (05-08-2013), mth123 (05-08-2013), RedEye (05-08-2013), reds44 (05-08-2013), remdog (06-08-2013)

  12. #83
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    280

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Corcino will be nothing but a middle RP, he is getting crushed in AAA. Just watch Gregorius become a star, it'll come. Stephenson is good SP prospect, but with a full rotation for the next few years, where does he fit in? Much rather have Didi instead of Cozart

  13. #84
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,940

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Swagger View Post
    Corcino will be nothing but a middle RP, he is getting crushed in AAA. Just watch Gregorius become a star, it'll come. Stephenson is good SP prospect, but with a full rotation for the next few years, where does he fit in? Much rather have Didi instead of Cozart
    So would the D'Backs, which is why they have him instead of Cozart.

    They wanted a shortstop. They traded pitching away in the deal to get him. They didn't want or need pitching.

  14. #85
    Worst Behavior. reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,481

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Swagger View Post
    Corcino will be nothing but a middle RP, he is getting crushed in AAA. Just watch Gregorius become a star, it'll come. Stephenson is good SP prospect, but with a full rotation for the next few years, where does he fit in? Much rather have Didi instead of Cozart
    I mean, if we're going by minor league numbers, Didi had a .717 OPS in the minors last year.

    Doesn't really scream "star" does it?
    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Let's face it, you mis-hit the bun with the mustard squirter, no one will really care.

  15. #86
    One and a half men Patrick Bateman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    5,967

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Swagger View Post
    Corcino will be nothing but a middle RP, he is getting crushed in AAA. Just watch Gregorius become a star, it'll come. Stephenson is good SP prospect, but with a full rotation for the next few years, where does he fit in? Much rather have Didi instead of Cozart
    What have you done for me yesterday.

    Fun fact: Did had a 288. OBP in 200 AAA at-bats last year. Where were you calling him the "sacred one" during that stretch last year?

    He also hasn't had an OBP above .350 since rookie ball. The guy aint an OBP machine. He's a guy who can defend at SS very well, has some pop, and some speed. He's a potential above average SS, and like many prospects, he very well might not reach that upside.

    He's far from can't miss. He doesn't have amazing upside. He's had 33 at-bats in the big leagues. Let's stop the hyperbole. Trading Stephenson, a prospect considered in most circles to be better then Didi, and Corcino, a guy that has generally had strong minor league results with the exception of a few starts this season in addition to being a well heralded prospect, rather than keeping Didi was not an obvious, nor a particularly smart move on paper.

    Arizona wanted Did more than the Reds. Cleveland wanted Bauer more than the Diamondbacks. Cincinnati wanted Choo more than the Indians.

    Sounds like a recipe for a trade. These things are SUPPOSED to work for everyone. It's not about who can make the other side feel violated.

  16. Likes:

    *BaseClogger* (05-08-2013), DocRed (05-08-2013), Homer Bailey (05-08-2013), REDREAD (05-08-2013), reds44 (05-08-2013), remdog (06-08-2013), Revering4Blue (05-09-2013), Tony Cloninger (05-08-2013)

  17. #87
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    159

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Maybe this has already been mentioned earlier in the thread (I admittedly did not read every page), but speaking of Didi doing quite well very early here for the D'backs, I seem to remember Cozart doing pretty darn well when he first came up for the Reds in the 2011 season, prior to getting hurt.

    Now maybe my mind is playing tricks on me and I am remembering Cozart doing better than what he factually did, but I remember reading several posts at the time that were all over Cozart's jock. Now that he has cooled off rather greatly, several are all of a sudden pining away for Didi based on few at-bats, early in the season.

    Sure, Didi may end up being a GREAT and very consistent player and his few early season at-bats could very well indicate the exact kind of player he is going to be for many years. Then again, once the league adjusts, he could also end up cooling off greatly, much like Cozart did.

    Bottom line, we got EXACTLY what we needed as far as a lead-off hitter is concerned in Choo and in retrospect, I make that trade all day long and twice on Sunday.

  18. #88
    Member Superdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,807

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Cast hall of fame ballot for middling prospect after forty at bats. Recreate trade with random players that have underperformed four months after the fact. Genius.

  19. Likes:

    DocRed (05-08-2013), HokieRed (05-08-2013), Homer Bailey (05-08-2013), mth123 (05-08-2013), reds44 (05-08-2013)

  20. #89
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    39 at-bats and a hot start for Gregorius and the board goes nuts for Didi.

    Dude was an average to mediocre minor league player. He'll come back to earth. 1 BB in 39 at-bats. His slugging has dropped into the .700's. On his way to reality.
    "I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

    "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread

  21. #90
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    CHATTANOOGA, TN USA
    Posts
    311

    Re: Didi Gregorius

    Didi put put up the following minor league numbers at the plate:

    2012 .324 OBP, .393 Slg, .717 OPS
    2011 .324 OBP, .429 Slg, .753 OPS
    2010 .326 OBP, .373 Slg, .699 OPS
    2009 .341 OBP, .367 Slg, .708 OPS

    I'm not a big fan of Cozart (he is Paul Janish with a bit more power which makes him a bottom third SS in NL to me) but Didi doesn't translate into more more at the plate. At best you can argue Didi will out OBP Cozart by 30-40 points, but Cozart will likely SLG Didi by 20-30 points. In the field...I'd have a hard time seeing Didi as better than Cozart.

    So we got a year of Choo for a nominal downgrade (short term) at SS. Plus we walked away from Stubbs contract which was getting higher and higher for his below average production. So looking at :

    Stubbs/Didi vs. Cozart/Choo + 4 Million in extra salary. I'll take Choo's production + salary + Cozart for this year and hopefully the shot at keeping for a few more.
    Last edited by UK Reds Fan; 05-08-2013 at 09:58 AM.

  22. Likes:

    REDREAD (05-08-2013)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25