LA Times lets you match up two teams by payroll by position.
http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#reds:braves
LA Times lets you match up two teams by payroll by position.
http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#reds:braves
757690 (05-06-2013)
Their numbers aren't accurate though, at least at cursory glance. For instance, Ludwick signed a two year, $15 million dollar deal this offseason but they have him earning only $2 million.
“I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”
Ludwick has a weird contract. He only makes 1MM this season. Then I imagine they spread his 2MM bonus over his 2 guaranteed years. His buyout is where he gets the rest of "this year's money".Originally Posted by Tom Servo
Not incorrect, just doesn't account for odd contracts.
This is very cool, thanks for sharing the link.
I love the Yankees' chart: 41.9 million dollars for a contingent of third basemen that has so far put up -0.6 WAR. That's got to hurt.
Goodness, Arroyo is making 16+ mil this season?
I'm more appalled that Nick Masset is stealing $3 million. Is that true?
Yeesh, that Dodgers graphic is...rather graphic. That outfield and starting rotation...wow.
Cots has him down for 6.5...though I know there is some fancy stuff going on with a bunch deferred.
Big picture though...60 million total for 2009-2013. He's been well worth it, even in spite of his league worst 2011 season. I would never have thunk it.
REDREAD (05-06-2013)
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote