Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 192

Thread: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,735

    More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Was having this discussion with my brother earlier. There's no question the Cardinals starting rotation is the best in the league so far, but is their 25-man roster more talented than the Reds roster? I don't think so.

  2. #2
    Member smixsell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,344

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Talent for what?

    For baseball............the Reds

    For whining or explaining things their sons......definitely the Cards.

  3. Likes:

    foxfire123 (05-13-2013),Redlegs (05-12-2013),Trajinous (05-30-2013)

  4. #3
    Salukifan2
    Guest

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    This screams paranoia/inferiority complex.

  5. Likes:

    Old school 1983 (05-12-2013)

  6. #4
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    The stats and recent performances say otherwise, but I just feel like that staff shouldn't be that good.

    Wainwright and Garcia rarely throw strikes when I watch them pitch. Everything is around the plate, but out of the k zone. But the hitters swing and miss liberally. I'd like to see hitters be more patient against them and see what happens. AJ Burnett of the Pirates is like that. Around the plate, but not necessarily strikes. If you get an ump with a large K zone, it helps too.

    This is based on when I watch them. I'm sure they look better against other clubs.

  7. #5
    Member marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli
    Posts
    10,042

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    I think the Reds have more talent right now, but the Cards farm system won't let them lag behind. Shelby Miller is already showing what he can do.

    I do think the rotation will regress, but they'll still be very good.
    It is on the whole probable that we continually dream, but that consciousness makes such a noise that we do not hear it. Carl Jung.

  8. #6
    Member smixsell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,344

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    In all seriousness. The gap isn't tremendous, but I do think the Reds have more talent. Espescially pitching talent.

    I think regression will wind up being a charitable description of the Card's pitching staff when the big 162 is done.

  9. #7
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,528

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by smixsell View Post
    In all seriousness. The gap isn't tremendous, but I do think the Reds have more talent. Espescially pitching talent.

    I think regression will wind up being a charitable description of the Card's pitching staff when the big 162 is done.
    I know everyone loves Shelby Miller right now, and he looks great. But just for some perspective:

    Mike Leake after his first 11 starts was 5-0 with a 2.22 ERA
    Travis Wood after his first 9 starts was 4-1 with a 2.52 ERA
    Tim Pugh after his first 7 starts was 4-2 with a 2.58 ERA

    And for those asking whose Tim Pugh? I say... exactly.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  10. Likes:

    remdog (05-12-2013),Trajinous (05-30-2013)

  11. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    I know everyone loves Shelby Miller right now, and he looks great. But just for some perspective:

    Mike Leake after his first 11 starts was 5-0 with a 2.22 ERA
    Travis Wood after his first 9 starts was 4-1 with a 2.52 ERA
    Tim Pugh after his first 7 starts was 4-2 with a 2.58 ERA

    And for those asking whose Tim Pugh? I say... exactly.
    I don't think any of those players were considered the top pitching prospect in baseball at any points in their minor league careers. Shelby Miller was ranked where he was for a reason. I'm not saying he will be THIS good but he has front of the rotation stuff. He's getting it done now with his fastball/curve and has yet to expose teams to his pretty good change up.

  12. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeThierry View Post
    I don't think any of those players were considered the top pitching prospect in baseball at any points in their minor league careers. Shelby Miller was ranked where he was for a reason. I'm not saying he will be THIS good but he has front of the rotation stuff. He's getting it done now with his fastball/curve and has yet to expose teams to his pretty good change up.
    While Shelby Miller has certainly been highly rated, he's never been considered the top pitching prospect in baseball.

    Baseball America had him #3 coming into this season.

    I'm a big fan of his and he's as good as you say, but you don't need to overstate his case.

  13. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    309

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    I think talent... the Reds

    Advanced scouting / game plan -- Cardinals

    Thinking how good Edwin Jackson (only 29) looked with the Cards, and how bad he looks now with the Cubs.

    Throw in the fact that Jake Westbrook's ERA right now is 1.62 despite having 19 K's and 18 BB's in 39 Innings with a Whip at 1.46.

  14. Likes:

    OGB (05-13-2013)

  15. #11
    Posting from Southwest VA redsfaninbsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, Va.
    Posts
    831

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    One thing is certain, St. Louis can't play any better than it is now. I still the Cardinals bullpen ends up costing them the division. The recent consistency of the Reds offense won't hurt either.
    This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home.

  16. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfaninbsg View Post
    One thing is certain, St. Louis can't play any better than it is now. I still the Cardinals bullpen ends up costing them the division. The recent consistency of the Reds offense won't hurt either.
    I've been on record here saying that the bullpen will cost them the division. That's before the recent moves they have made though. Adding Mujica as the closer and bringing up two studs including Carlos Martinez has really solidified the pen. Rosenthal has been pitching great as of late. The Cardinals didn't wait until July to fix their pen like they did the previous two years. If they were going to stick with the group they had, I would agree with you but the paradigm shifted when they brought in more talented pitchers.

  17. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeThierry View Post
    .... and bringing up two studs including Carlos Martinez has really solidified the pen....
    Maness is a stud?

    Who knew?

  18. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Maness is a stud?

    Who knew?
    He didn't have a great year in AAA but he barely walks people and his WHIP in the minor leagues has always been rather good. He's a stud compared to the other relievers the Cardinals have had.

    Carolos Martinez is legit.

  19. #15
    Salukifan2
    Guest

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Maness is a stud?

    Who knew?
    10 BB in 170 innings last year is pretty studly


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator