Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 92

Thread: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

  1. #16
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,925

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Just when you think you've hit bottom, along comes a poster with an excavator who digs us down even further.
    It really doesn't have to take us all into the sinkhole.

    The best way to respond to a thread like that is with humor, IMO.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,925

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by malcontent View Post
    Not at all.

    Wait....you like Tony's butt?

  4. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    72

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    His defense is better than Rolens already. Rolen is brittle. He's been forked.

  5. #19
    malingered here too long malcontent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    2,930

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    Wait....you like Tony's butt?
    I couldn't help myself.

    There's only one answer to that question.
    Everything is perfect, but there is a lot of room for improvement. --- Shunryu Suzuki-roshi

  6. #20
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,212

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Why do croutons come in airtight packages? It’s just stale bread.

  7. Likes:

    OGB (05-22-2013), _Sir_Charles_ (05-22-2013)

  8. #21
    One and a half men Patrick Bateman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    5,823

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    It's the same guy who is clearly addicted to small sample sizes.

  9. #22
    Member Sabo Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    845

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    You know how in school the teacher always preached that there is no such thing as a stupid question?

    Yeah, I never bought it either.
    "It's still a long way to the top if we want to rock'n'roll, but at least they dumped the tuba player."
    --M2

  10. #23
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    9,746

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabo Fan View Post
    You know how in school the teacher always preached that there is no such thing as a stupid question?

    Yeah, I never bought it either.
    I actually agree with the teacher. I have no problem with this question.

    I just don't understand the need to pile on a poster who asks a question you think isn't up to your standard. If it really isn't, then ignore it.
    "Man, the pitch looks fast, even in slow motion." Thom Brennaman on Chapman's fastball.

  11. Likes:

    MBZags (05-22-2013), Old school 1983 (05-22-2013), RadfordVA (05-22-2013)

  12. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    147

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    I think all of you are getting trolled a bit to easily.

    The original poster is making this somewhat of a specialty. I would advise you not to feed him if you don't wish poor threads such as this to become a daily ritual for him.

    Just putting that out there.

  13. Likes:

    cumberlandreds (05-22-2013), texasdave (05-21-2013)

  14. #25
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,925

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by malcontent View Post
    I couldn't help myself.

    There's only one answer to that question.
    That's what I was afraid of.

  15. #26
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7,129

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    I know Larry's reply is with tongue firmly in cheek. As for RedTruck starting all these threads...I can't say the same.
    "Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."

  16. Likes:

    PuffyPig (05-21-2013), wolfboy (05-22-2013)

  17. #27
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,105

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Maybe RedTruck should take a break from posting new topics in the ORG? Seriously, every thread he starts screams don't click on me.

    "Is Jay Bruce one of the top 10 players in MLB when he's "hot"?"
    "Are the Reds one of the best teams in the MLB right now?"
    "Should Cozart be designated for assignment? "
    "Is Votto comparable to Ruth, Mantle, Mays in terms of raw talent?"
    "Is Choo equivalent to Votto in terms of talent?"
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  18. Likes:

    Billy Hamilton's Legs (05-22-2013), CySeymour (05-22-2013), George Anderson (05-21-2013)

  19. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    147

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    oops, ignore

  20. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,520

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by zjr1717 View Post
    I think all of you are getting trolled a bit to easily.

    The original poster is making this somewhat of a specialty. I would advise you not to feed him if you don't wish poor threads such as this to become a daily ritual for him.

    Just putting that out there.
    If his posts are trolling then ban him.

    Until then, most will treat them at face value.

  21. #30
    They call me "chef"
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    885

    Re: Would Scott Rolen be more productive this year than Todd Frazier?

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    Reds are really hurting right now and both Frazier and Cozart are big reasons why this team has gotten off to such a bad start. Walt better address these issues now before the Cardinals lead keeps getting bigger and bigger.
    My post is being taken out of context.

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    Reds are really hurting right now
    By "really hurting" I meant "really hurting opponents".

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    and both Frazier and Cozart are big reasons why this team has gotten off to such a bad start.
    By "such a bad start" I meant "a start as bad as this, which is not bad at all".

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    Walt better address these issues now...
    By "now" I meant "now in this lifetime", as in "Walt can't address these issues when he is gone, so he must do it whole he is still here". It's a philosophical perspective.

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    ...before the Cardinals lead keeps getting bigger and bigger.
    By "lead" I meant "lead, the metal" as I believe the Cards will be sinking soon.

    I hope this clarifies things.
    Cincinnati Reds 2014 W-L Record: 76.6-85.4*

    Cincinnati Reds 2015 W-L Record: TBA

    *UPDATED: 2/11/2014

  22. Likes:

    *BaseClogger* (05-22-2013), Always Red (05-22-2013), AtomicDumpling (05-22-2013), cincrazy (05-22-2013), PedroBourbon (05-22-2013), RichRed (05-22-2013), Tom Servo (05-21-2013), wolfboy (05-22-2013), Wonderful Monds (05-22-2013)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25