Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 29 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 421

Thread: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

  1. #31
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    And that's the last of the 3 hits I said he was allotted.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    147

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    And that's a fly to end the inning. So out of the inning with only one run scored.

  4. #33
    Posting from Southwest VA redsfaninbsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, Va.
    Posts
    831

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    Not really. I think people are assuming that they wanted to bring up Cingrani again. I don't think they want to. I think they want him to stay down there and work on his secondary stuff. Johnny told them about the muscle after the game...they needed to find out how it responded to rest and exercise...that took time. From the sounds of things, we're looking at needing someone for maybe 2 starts...Pedro should be expected to be able to fill that small void. If not, he should be released IMO.
    So in the thick of a pennant race, the Reds are just running guys out there to see if they can fill a void? If so, this team just took a huge step back in my book. These guys pitch in September when you are out of it or already have it locked up. If they knew about Cueto, they should have worked it to get Cingrani on this day. If he's not needed, great, if he is, he's pitching tonight.
    This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home.

  5. #34
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    1: Pedro goes 7 of 3 hit / 1 run ball.
    Okay, now he just needs to throw a no-hit shutout for the next 6 innings. Strap in Pedro!

  6. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    917

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    At least he gave up the home run at the right time.

  7. #36
    Member RedsBrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,345

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Hope the bats of the good guys are hot tonight....gonna need the runs.

  8. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    147

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Choo pops out in foul territory.

    Cozart in with a double at the wall!

  9. #38
    Posting from Southwest VA redsfaninbsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, Va.
    Posts
    831

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Alright, get this run back.
    This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home.

  10. #39
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfaninbsg View Post
    So in the thick of a pennant race, the Reds are just running guys out there to see if they can fill a void? If so, this team just took a huge step back in my book. These guys pitch in September when you are out of it or already have it locked up. If they knew about Cueto, they should have worked it to get Cingrani on this day. If he's not needed, great, if he is, he's pitching tonight.
    I think you're missing my point. They see Cingrani as a long-term solution. In order to get the most out of that, he needs to work on that secondary stuff. Why scrub that plan for 1 or 2 starts? He has not been succeeding lately IIRC. He's clearly working on that stuff they want him to. So let him work on it.

    Villareal is not a scrub. He's a starting pitcher at the AAA level who got a call up last year. He may get tattooed tonight...but I think the Reds have confidence in Pedro to keep the Reds in a game.
    Last edited by _Sir_Charles_; 06-05-2013 at 07:32 PM. Reason: typo

  11. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    147

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Some great baserunning by Cozart there to make second.

  12. #41
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,124

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    boo tulowitzki
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  13. #42
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Is it just me or was Votto just jogging to first?

  14. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,492

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    Not really. I think people are assuming that they wanted to bring up Cingrani again. I don't think they want to. I think they want him to stay down there and work on his secondary stuff. Johnny told them about the muscle after the game...they needed to find out how it responded to rest and exercise...that took time. From the sounds of things, we're looking at needing someone for maybe 2 starts...Pedro should be expected to be able to fill that small void. If not, he should be released IMO.
    Reds are in no position to waste ballgames using their third or fourth best AAA pitcher.

    My guess is they made a calculated decision that Cueto would likely pitch tonight and so they didn't rearrange the AAA rotation. It backfired.

    Even if Pedro V throws a three hitter and goes the route, I would have Cingrani pitch next time.

  15. #44
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Galarraga isn't on the 40-man, but I'd have rather seen him up here pitching.

  16. #45
    Posting from Southwest VA redsfaninbsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, Va.
    Posts
    831

    Re: 6/5/2013 Reds v. Rockies (it just got Villareal in here)

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    I think you're missing my point. They see Cingrani as a long-term solution. In order to get the most out of that, he needs to work on that secondary stuff. Why scrub that plan for 1 or 2 starts? He has not been succeeding lately. He's clearly working on that stuff they want him to. So let him work on it.

    Villareal is not a scrub. He's a starting pitcher at the AAA level who got a call up last year. He may get tattooed tonight...but I think the Reds have confidence in Pedro to keep the Reds in a game.
    I understand what you are saying, I just don't agree with this philosophy. At this point, you are trying to win games at the MLB level. To me, that means running your best out there and I think Cingrani is clearly better than Villareal.
    This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator