Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 58

Thread: Pete Rose 4256

  1. #1
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,876

    Pete Rose 4256

    Just how impressive is this feat. Derek Jeter has trekked towards 3500-3800 for most of his career but goes down again to the DL around 3310 hits.

    Will we ever see 3500? 3700? 4,000? again?

    I still think Jeter gets a couple dozen more this year and eventually get to 3500+

    Ichiro might get to 3,000 and had over 1,000 in Japan, but Tuffy Rhodes was a star over there too.....but had Ichiro always been here he might be pushing near 4,000.

    Miguel Cabrera is at 2,000 at a very young age but I'd be pretty shocked if he went too far past 3,000....but could push 3500

    Arod, Griffey and Pujols looked to be 3500 guys for a long time. Roberto Alomar had the 3500 look until his early 30's.

    To me.....4256 is getting more and more impressive. Good Luck Mr. Trout


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,518

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Can we take bets on it?
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    A little bit off topic, but do you guys think that Jesse Winker profiles more like Pete Rose or is he just the next Hal Morris??

  4. Likes:

    klw (08-06-2013),PedroBourbon (08-06-2013)

  5. #3
    Beer is good!! George Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    5,964

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Its funny you post this because to date I have 4,294 posts and to me it seems like a bunch. I was just thinking the other day that I have posted as many times as Rose has gotten a hit. Thats alotta hits and posts.
    "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard

  6. #4
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,876

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    Can we take bets on it?
    Awful

  7. #5
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,876

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
    Its funny you post this because to date I have 4,294 posts and to me it seems like a bunch. I was just thinking the other day that I have posted as many times as Rose has gotten a hit. Thats alotta hits and posts.
    The baseball wall in the Reds HOF is very telling and awesome.

  8. Likes:

    BRM13 (08-06-2013),George Anderson (08-05-2013)

  9. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    San Marcos, CA
    Posts
    14,059

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
    Its funny you post this because to date I have 4,294 posts and to me it seems like a bunch. I was just thinking the other day that I have posted as many times as Rose has gotten a hit. Thats alotta hits and posts.
    You need PEDs.

  10. Likes:

    George Anderson (08-05-2013)

  11. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,735

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironman92 View Post
    To me.....4256 is getting more and more impressive.
    There were PEDs back then; just different ones. IMO, that "hit king" label becomes less impressive with each passing year.

  12. #8
    5.3 Posts Abv Replacement BluegrassRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of Cincinnati
    Posts
    6,246

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Cabrera's body type probably doesn't give him a chance. But then again, Pete didn't exactly have the ideal body. He probably played through stuff that would debilitate some of these other guys, though.
    Rounding third and heading for home...

  13. Likes:

    Ironman92 (08-06-2013)

  14. #9
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,876

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by New York Red View Post
    There were PEDs back then; just different ones. IMO, that "hit king" label becomes less impressive with each passing year.
    So if every generation had them and everyone used them.....how is it not impressive to have over 4250 when we may never see 3500 again?

  15. #10
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,876

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by BluegrassRedleg View Post
    Cabrera's body type probably doesn't give him a chance. But then again, Pete didn't exactly have the ideal body. He probably played through stuff that would debilitate some of these other guys, though.
    That why I was just mentioning possible "3500" guys.

  16. #11
    Eight bosses? Bob Sheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Eight, Bob.
    Posts
    3,389

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Pete said himself that if he wouldn't have been manager, there is no way he would have started as much as he did, and he certainly wouldn't have been allowed to bat 2nd.

    His last "good" year was 1981. By '84 he should have been finished. He came back to the Reds and it was like he was 10 years younger. It should have been his swan song.

    Instead, he managed himself into the 2 hole for the next two seasons to the tune of:
    1985: .264 avg .713 OPS
    1986: .219 avg .586 OPS

    24 years in the majors. Should have been 22. I just don't see anyone breaking his record.
    "Lemonade requires a significant amount of sugar. Otherwise, you've just made lemon juice."

  17. #12
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,876

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Sheed View Post
    Pete said himself that if he wouldn't have been manager, there is no way he would have started as much as he did, and he certainly wouldn't have been allowed to bat 2nd.

    His last "good" year was 1981. By '84 he should have been finished. He came back to the Reds and it was like he was 10 years younger. It should have been his swan song.

    Instead, he managed himself into the 2 hole for the next two seasons to the tune of:
    1985: .264 avg .713 OPS
    1986: .219 avg .586 OPS

    24 years in the majors. Should have been 22. I just don't see anyone breaking his record.
    Why should it have been 22? In his 22nd year he came back to the Reds and hit .365 in the last couple months....and had 4,097 hits, why in the world would anyone not want him back? .713 OPS batting 2nd....that wasn't a factor in 1985....he was going for the record and no one in the world cared the #2 hole guy was hitting .265

    He was terrible in 1986, but he didn't play a lot and most 45 year olds are.

  18. #13
    Member klw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    15,137

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Pete's OPS + in 85 was 99. He was league average and was 3/4 for OPS +/OPS out of the 6 qualifiers for the 85 Reds. He also had a OBP of .395 which would look great in the two hole back then and today. Now the 2 HR and .319 slugging percentage were kind of sad for a first baseman.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CIN/1985.shtml

    In 85, perhaps the team would have been better served with Esasky at first and Davis or Redus getting more time in the OF but with a .395 OBP it is hard to argue Rose should not have gotten time.
    Last edited by klw; 08-06-2013 at 09:26 AM.

  19. Likes:

    Big Klu (08-07-2013)

  20. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Papist
    Posts
    5,170

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    If Tony Gwynn had taken better care of himself, he'd have been a candidate to push towards 4,000 hits.

  21. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,735

    Re: Pete Rose 4256

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironman92 View Post
    So if every generation had them and everyone used them.....how is it not impressive to have over 4250 when we may never see 3500 again?
    What evidence do you have that suggests every generation had them?


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator