"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
I watch the Nats a lot. Last year they basically tempted the baseball gods by not only shutting down Strasburg but by proclaiming how they will be there (in the WS hunt) year after year. Call it arrogance, call it bad karma or a kenahora (Yiddish term for not tempting bad things when they are good), but the Nats set themselves up for this season.
Further, they only bat one way -- they just swing for the fences. And with the air in DC, it turns out to be lots of balls hit to the warning track. I was at a game last month and the lowly Brewers played small ball and smoked them. Why? Because before you swing for the fences, you need to have runners on base. The Nats just don't get on base enough and when they do hit homers, its usually Harper running around the bases with no one on.
Frankly, I think the Nats may be falling behind the Mets by next season.
Where we gonna go?
That's the ownerships way of copping out IMO. Every player is going to want to play. It's in their blood. The Bronson Arroyo's are a rare breed. A player who will actually tell you when he's hurt and probably shouldn't continue. 99.9% of the players will tell you "I'm fine coach" when their arm is hanging on with a strip of duct tape. A responsible (and successful) organization will take the players best interest into account and put their health above anything on the diamond.
And btw...Dusty is FANTASTIC in this regard. His unspoken rule of "give 'em another day" when a guy is coming back from the DL goes a long way IMO in making sure that players stay healthy longer.
Big Klu (08-09-2013)
A successful organization will ultimately only be defined by their on-field results. What you call putting health above anything on the diamond, I call protecting assets. And for me that's the rub.
A pitcher like Strasburg (heck, any pitcher really) is more or less an un-protectable asset over the long term with any certainty. Injuries can and will happen. Their risk can be mitigated, sure, and if WAS weren't the best NL team last year, I'd agree the only rational thing to do was shut him down.
But they were the NL's best team. And they had a legit chance to leverage a risky asset for their first championship. And mind you, not automatically be cashing it all in. Perhaps, sure. But perhaps not also. From an organizational standpoint, I don't agree with what they did.
Really interesting debate either way.
RedlegJake (08-09-2013)
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |