2 years ago missouri was in the inferior Big 12, fast forward to today and they are in the SEC championship. This is a fact i have noticed almost everyone is ignoring. I was told the SEC is light years ahead of everyone else.Originally Posted by jojo
Gizmo (12-01-2013)
fixed
Is it "next season" yet?
I don't think anyone would argue that the SEC west is superior by a large degree over the east. And FYI, Mizzou went 1-7 in the SEC last year.
When all is said and done more is said than done.
and no one who went 1-7 in the Big Ten last year is sniffing a championship, nor the ACC, nor the PAC12, nor the AAC, nor......
so much parity in the SEC, i guess, to let nobody's one year be champs the next.
Is it "next season" yet?
It's not about the past. 2013 Missouri is good. Very good.
When all is said and done more is said than done.
Frankly, I could stomach OSU getting beaten out by a 1 loss Alabama team than Auburn.
Auburn lost a game which, in my opinion, puts you behind all no-loss BCS teams. If it was a pick of 1 loss teams and who was best, ok, I can see the argument. But losses mattered last time I checked. Not to mention Auburn had 2 miracle wins. The Georgia game they really should have lost and yesterday's game would have been an OT toss-up.
But all this is arguing how many angels can dance on a head of a pin. Prove it in head to head games on the field.
She used to wake me up with coffee ever morning
Agreed
When all is said and done more is said than done.
Care to expand on the disagreement?We'll agree on Alabama, disagree on the rest.
I think Bama blew more coverage assignments yesterday than they have in the last 3 years combined. It took 3 missed FG's and a miracle to beat them. After the lack of discipline yesterday, I feel sorry for whoever Alabama plays in their bowl game, it will be a slaughter.
USC steamrolled a team a week earlier that hung around all day against FSU.
Some mediocre teams played with Auburn this season, did they not? Do you think that Georia and Ole Miss are vastly superior to Ohio State?
This is about as irrelevant of a comment as there could be. Two years in college football is an eternity. But really, if you can't be bothered with context, don't construct irrelevant context.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
Explain away the last seven national championships....then you can start working on the narrative that OSU's flaccid schedule shouldn't be a factor.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
It became completely in context once you made the comment that OSU would lose three games in the SEC.
LSU got to play at home, at night.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
OSU's schedule is their weakest argument for playing in the BCS championship. It's no small wonder Buckeye fans want to talk about everyone else's schedule.
The SEC champion should jump OSU. No one believes that OSU would be undefeated in the SEC. They'd probably be a 3 loss team with Tennessee's schedule. It really undercuts the "but, but, but ....we're undefeated" argument.
Last edited by jojo; 12-01-2013 at 06:15 PM.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
So did Northwestern before they were all injured, and OSU wasn't down 21 in the 4th, or ever, in that game.
Wouldn't care who's schedule was being talked about if FSU's was ever brought up at any point. Media ignores FSU, despite having a worse schedule and conference than OSU. Sure, let SEC SoS come into play, if FSU's does too, then FSU is #3....OSU's schedule is their weakest argument for playing in the BCS championship. It's no small wonder Buckeye fans want to talk about everyone else's schedule.
Is it "next season" yet?
jimbo (12-01-2013)
They would. Two years ago they were being hit with sanctions for cheating. You really want to argue about two years ago?
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
