Turn Off Ads?
Page 20 of 23 FirstFirst ... 101617181920212223 LastLast
Results 286 to 300 of 345

Thread: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

  1. #286
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,228

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    The story has been the same since June. The pitching has been unable to shut down even decent offenses, and the offense has been hit or miss. This team isn't the kind that's going to go on a torrid streak. They're designed to avoid long losing jags, but not for long unbroken win streaks.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #287
    Member 1940757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    500

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Not in Milwaukee. That team can hit.
    Nope, they've only played 4 at home before us this month. Lost one to the Angels and 2 of 3 to the Bucs. In August, they lost 2 of 3 to the Nats at home and lost 2 of 3 to the Cards.

    It's just us. We can't beat them. Why? Haven't a clue.
    Reds & Nats, 2013 LCS. Take2 (9/13) Reds but no Nats

  4. #288
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,135

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by RANDY IN INDY View Post
    .........and if they hadn't where might they be?
    Probably in the same exact spot.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  5. #289
    Member Mutaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,020

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Not in Milwaukee. That team can hit.
    Brewers had lost 5 of their last 6 at home to Pirates and Angels coming into this series. On paper, Reds and Brewers aren't even in the same universe. Same old Red Legs who just dropped 2 out of 3 to the Cubs at home.

  6. #290
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,879

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Fitting I guess that Bruce couldn't haul in the big play in the 8th and then Gomez robs Bruce of the big play in the 9th.

    Our OF defense this series was troubling.

  7. #291
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,045

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsBrick View Post
    Yes really. We've seen it already. Everyone reacts differently with Hamilton on the bases. The great Molina's throw was off the mark because he rushed it....Hamilton safe. Pitchers divert their attention when Hamilton's on base. Choo is not the base stealer that Hamilton is. Hamilton hasn't been caught yet...and everyone in the stadium knows that when Hamilton's on the bases, he's stealing...and they still can't throw him out. He would've been on second with Phillips still at the plate. As I mentioned already, Phillips is a better hitter with runners in scoring position (maybe he shouldn't be, but he is). There would've been a legit RBI opportunity earlier in the inning. Choo stole with 2 outs and Votto at the plate....of course they're going to intentionally give him a pass at that point.

    The opportunities are completely different if Hamilton is running rather than Choo.
    Bruce hit a bomb and was robbed of a 3-run homer. Would Hamilton have stole all 3 bases? This game was lost by Bronson's and the bullpen's inability to throw strikes in the 7th and 8th.
    "In our sundown perambulations of late, through the outer parts of Brooklyn, we have observed several parties of youngsters playing 'base', a certain game of ball. Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our close rooms, the game of ball is glorious"
    -Walt Whitman

  8. #292
    Member RedsBrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,345

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by kbrake View Post
    Not saying the game was lost by not using Hamilton but it could have definitely made a difference. If Hamilton steals right away we all know BP would bunt him to third. They probably still pitch around/walk Votto and now the Bruce long fly is a sac fly and Chapman is pitching the bottom of the 9th. You have a great weapon for close games late. Use it.
    There was already one out with BP batting, so unless he bunts for a base hit Bruce's out still would've been the third. But I agree...put Hamilton in, let him steal and let BP salivate over another RBI

  9. #293
    Member WVRedsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Rainelle, WV
    Posts
    10,568

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    This was a team loss. Bronson lost it in the 7th and was allowed to stay until the bases were full and a run scored. Hoover clearly is not the plus reliever many think and we're tied. Then Dusty puts Parra in, the retread rejected by a couple of teams for just this. Luck? Maybe, but three decisions led to this loss outlined above. We will be lucky to get the wild card this year, but if the Reds do, they could come around. I hope.
    www.ris-news.com
    "You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5."
    -Beano Cook

  10. #294
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,228

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by Larkin Fan View Post
    I'm confident we make the postseason. I'm just no longer confident that we'll be at all successful.
    That's where I am. There's just no evidence to suggest any other kind of outcome. In order to win the pennant, this team will have to find a way to post eight wins against very good competition within a two week span. That's flat out insurmountable for this club.

  11. #295
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    292

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by Larkin Fan View Post
    I'm confident we make the postseason. I'm just no longer confident that we'll be at all successful.
    Based on this one game?

  12. #296
    Member kbrake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,908

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsBrick View Post
    There was already one out with BP batting, so unless he bunts for a base hit Bruce's out still would've been the third. But I agree...put Hamilton in, let him steal and let BP salivate over another RBI
    Yeah I just realized that. Still think Hamilton gives you a much better chance of scoring in that inning.

  13. Likes:

    RedsBrick (09-15-2013)

  14. #297
    Member RollyInRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    15,738

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    Probably in the same exact spot.
    Maybe, but maybe not. One will never know.

  15. #298
    Member xsteve1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    89

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    I still think Reds will still be fine. Get 4 or 5 of the next 6. Really would be nice to get Marshall back.

  16. #299
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,135

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by RANDY IN INDY View Post
    Maybe, but maybe not. One will never know.
    This one man knows that acquiring a 36 year old/probably back on PEDs in a career year Marlon Byrd and a washed up Justin Morneau isn't 'all in'. If somebody wants to say they were solid moves, that's one thing. But 'all in' is getting Cliff Lee or Giancarlo Stanton.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  17. #300
    Member RedsBrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,345

    Re: 9/15/13 - Reds @ Milwaukee

    Quote Originally Posted by Reds Freak View Post
    Bruce hit a bomb and was robbed of a 3-run homer. Would Hamilton have stole all 3 bases? This game was lost by Bronson's and the bullpen's inability to throw strikes in the 7th and 8th.
    Your argument about Bruce is 20/20 hindsight and is analysis going backwards.

    I don't disagree that pitching didn't hold up today....but the Reds still had a chance to be aggressive and win this game despite that. Unfortunately it was managed passively....playing for extra innings...and we see how that turned out.

    The kid has been on base 5 times for the Reds...he's stolen 5 bases...and scored 4 times. That's 80% of the time he's been on base he's scored. But, let's keep him on the bench...especially in the very situation in which he excels.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator