I've been arguing this plan for years. I saw the Cardinals work it like a charm for decades. There are plenty of good arms who can get MLB hitters out the first few times around the league. Keep drafting them, plug them into the pen for a season or two, then bring up fresh ones when the league figures them out. No need to marry Ondrusek types. Just rent them
Hoping to change my username to 75769024
I have a love-hate relationship with Albert Pujols. Mostly hate.
Actually, that makes the case that he should be throwing clean innings rather than being counted on to clean up other people's messes. Giving up a shot hurts the team a lot less when it's a solo in the 9th inning of a 3 run game than when it's a 3 run bomb in the 7th inning of a 1 run game.
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/c...ews+for+MLB%29
Jonathan Broxton, coming off surgery to repair a torn flexor mass in his right forearm, might not be ready for spring training. The Reds could turn to another internal option such as J.J. Hoover, Alfredo Simon or Logan Ondrusek, but such a move would disrupt their well-constructed bullpen.
Adding a free-agent closer? Chapman, projected to earn $4.6 million in his first year of arbitration by Matt Swartz of MLBTradeRumors.com, is more affordable than any who are available – and better than any of them, too.
Remember, the Reds are trying to win. They probably do not want to add to the stress of bullpen management for Price, who is a former pitching coach but first-time manager. Oh, they always could invent a closer, but when teams do that it often is by accident, not because of any grand plan.
Reinventing Chapman as a starter actually could weaken the Reds in both the bullpen and rotation. It might take Chapman a full season to re-acclimate to starting. And who knows whether he would even succeed?
Chapman is easily flustered and does not always handle adversity well. As a starter he would be more vulnerable to irritants such as bunts, stolen bases, hitters who take pitches. As a reliever, he’s electric, a ninth-inning shot of adrenaline. Really, this choice should be easy.
Billy Hamilton's Legs (11-19-2013)
No. It makes the case that in the ninth inning; of a close game; in a home run stadium like GABP; it's probably best not to put an extreme fly ball pitcher on the mound.
If you think Hoover should pitch only "clean innings" he can do so earlier in games.
The fact that a closer sometimes pitches with a three run lead should not drive the train. You pick a closer because he can nail down the close ones.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |