Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 50

Thread: Top 10 Rotations

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    158

    Top 10 Rotations

    Saw someone post ESPN's list on another site. They have:

    1. Tigers
    2. Dodgers
    3. Nationals
    4. Cardinals
    5. Pirates
    6. A's
    7. Rangers
    8. Braves
    9. Reds
    10. Rays

    They just posted the list so I didn't see their reasoning for each team.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    I think a conservative estimate is for every Red starter to have an ERA under 2.90 this year. They really should be 1 or 2.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    158

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by RealitySetsIn View Post
    I think a conservative estimate is for every Red starter to have an ERA under 2.90 this year. They really should be 1 or 2.

  4. Likes:

    camisadelgolf (12-30-2013), Reds&BuckeyeGuy (01-03-2014)

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by LewGra View Post
    Completely.
    Latos and Bailey are two of the top ten starters in baseball.
    Cueto is around 15th or 20th because of injury concerns but has the talent to be top four.
    Leake would be an ace on a lot of staffs.
    Cingrani is the best young pitcher in MLB. I think he's better than Cole, Fernandez, Harvey, etc...

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    158

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by RealitySetsIn View Post
    Completely.
    Latos and Bailey are two of the top ten starters in baseball.
    Cueto is around 15th or 20th because of injury concerns but has the talent to be top four.
    Leake would be an ace on a lot of staffs.
    Cingrani is the best young pitcher in MLB. I think he's better than Cole, Fernandez, Harvey, etc...
    Thanks. That should be enough to let people know they don't have to take you seriously.

  7. Likes:

    camisadelgolf (12-30-2013), CoachBombay (12-30-2013), dubc47834 (01-03-2014), JMac84 (12-28-2013), JohnnyBench (12-31-2013), Reds&BuckeyeGuy (01-03-2014)

  8. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by LewGra View Post
    Thanks. That should be enough to let people know they don't have to take you seriously.
    You should take me as seriously as you take the people that made predictions in last year's prediction thread that turned out nowhere near true.
    I recall one saying the Cardinals wouldn't win 70 games, another saying that Votto and Bruce would hit 40 bombs, and one saying that 5 Reds pitchers would end up in the top 10 of Cy Young voting.
    Last edited by RealitySetsIn; 12-28-2013 at 12:18 PM. Reason: Grammar.

  9. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    44

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by RealitySetsIn View Post
    Completely.
    Latos and Bailey are two of the top ten starters in baseball.
    Cueto is around 15th or 20th because of injury concerns but has the talent to be top four.
    Leake would be an ace on a lot of staffs.
    Cingrani is the best young pitcher in MLB. I think he's better than Cole, Fernandez, Harvey, etc...


    Talk about delusional.

  10. #8
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    North Kansas City, Mo
    Posts
    5,771

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by RealitySetsIn View Post
    Completely.
    Latos and Bailey are two of the top ten starters in baseball.
    Cueto is around 15th or 20th because of injury concerns but has the talent to be top four.
    Leake would be an ace on a lot of staffs.
    Cingrani is the best young pitcher in MLB. I think he's better than Cole, Fernandez, Harvey, etc...
    #1 would be a lot better stated as National League - you could make a case for it but top 20 in the NL would be easier to defend.
    #2 Well, the first half is spot on but top 4 I think is over rating Cueto quite a bit.
    #3 Maybe for the worst 2 or 3 staffs but he is a very solid #4-5 starter. But your earlier assertion he should be at 2.90 or lower is way, way optimistic. Amend that to 3.50 and you might defend it.
    #4 He'll certainly be better than Harvey next year. Best in MLB? Now that is hyperbole. This may be the worst of your predictions.

    Overall I am not saying your predictions couldn't come true, its just very unlikely. First, Cueto, Latos and Cingrani have health concerns. I'd be very surprised if at least one of them doesn't bite the dust at some point. Cingrani still needs better consistency with secondary stuff and has to be more efficient. 5 innings a game won't get it. I take you seriously, though.
    No - I am not from State Farm!

  11. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    87

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by LewGra View Post
    Saw someone post ESPN's list on another site. They have:

    1. Tigers
    2. Dodgers
    3. Nationals
    4. Cardinals
    5. Pirates
    6. A's
    7. Rangers
    8. Braves
    9. Reds
    10. Rays

    They just posted the list so I didn't see their reasoning for each team.

    I think Cincy is better than 9th. They pitch in a hitter friendly park. Of the top 10, only Texas and Cincy SP's pitch in a top 10 hitters park. But them in an average park and they would look significantly better.

    Team Rank Park Factor
    Tigers 15th 101
    Dodgers 17th 97
    Nationals 14th 102
    Cardinals 21st 88
    Pirates 26th 83
    A's 24th 86
    Rangers 3rd 125
    Braves 16th 97
    Reds 4th 121
    Rays 25th 85


    I don't know how to format-- it looks great when I type it-- then when I post it's ugly. Sorry for the ugly read-- but Texas home park is 3rd, Cincy's is 4th. The next highest park factor is the Nationals @ 14th. As you can see, 8 of the top 10 basically play @ neutral or pitchers parks-- not hitters ballparks like Texas and Cincy.

    Park factor #'s from fangraphs.

  12. #10
    Member Lewdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Ky
    Posts
    318

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    I had said it in another thread, that I had seen multiple guys on ESPN say that the Reds have the best starting rotation in baseball, and if they lose Bailey and insert Chapman into the starting rotation, it will still be in the top 5.

  13. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    158

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewdog View Post
    I had said it in another thread, that I had seen multiple guys on ESPN say that the Reds have the best starting rotation in baseball, and if they lose Bailey and insert Chapman into the starting rotation, it will still be in the top 5.
    The same multiple guys on ESPN that told us the Nationals would play the Blue Jays in the World Series?

  14. #12
    Grouch ac084c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    463

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewdog View Post
    I had said it in another thread, that I had seen multiple guys on ESPN say that the Reds have the best starting rotation in baseball, and if they lose Bailey and insert Chapman into the starting rotation, it will still be in the top 5.
    Don't you think that if they were going to put Chapman in the starting rotation, they would have done, it - oh I don't know, two years ago.... last year even (when Cueto went down). He doesn't want to start, period.

  15. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    54

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by ac084c View Post
    Don't you think that if they were going to put Chapman in the starting rotation, they would have done, it - oh I don't know, two years ago.... last year even (when Cueto went down). He doesn't want to start, period.
    I just dont get why not either.. Is it because he doesnt have a good aresnal of pitches? Doesnt want the stress? Or does he not want the money lol

  16. #14
    Grouch ac084c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    463

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by Reds&BuckeyeGuy View Post
    I just dont get why not either.. Is it because he doesnt have a good aresnal of pitches? Doesnt want the stress? Or does he not want the money lol
    Search me. His pitches are fine, you'd think he'd want the money.

    Maybe not the stress - maybe he doesn't want to put the work in required. He's one of the first pitchers I've seen that would rather close than start, though.

  17. #15
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,796

    Re: Top 10 Rotations

    Quote Originally Posted by LewGra View Post
    Saw someone post ESPN's list on another site. They have:

    1. Tigers
    2. Dodgers
    3. Nationals
    4. Cardinals
    5. Pirates
    6. A's
    7. Rangers
    8. Braves
    9. Reds
    10. Rays

    They just posted the list so I didn't see their reasoning for each team.
    I think this is about right. Pretty much all the contenders in the NL have really strong rotations. The Reds have a really good group, but they aren't better than the competition (and are probably lagging behind teams like the Nats and Dodgers). I get the standard response that the rotation will carry us and if the rotation stinks it will surely sink us, but the rotation doesn't really give the Reds a competitive advantage in the NL. All the rotations are good and it will come down to offense to differentiate the teams. The Reds are seriously behind most of the contenders in that area.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25