And yet he's probably more versatile and has more on base ability than any bench player the Reds had last year.Originally Posted by ac084c
And yet he's probably more versatile and has more on base ability than any bench player the Reds had last year.
Surprised to not see the Angels there.
It was put out before that whirlwind Mark Mulder signing.
No, I seriously don't think so. I put very little thought into these rankings. I mean they had Nats as top team last year and what happened with that?
Good point. ESPN is still trying to hype them. I hear Harper is trying to ad about 20 lbs of muscle on by spring training. I bet they pick him to win the MVP before the season starts.
Can you not? A players effort is one of the few things I can gauge from my couch. Some players are lazy and still put up decent numbers, but i still wouldn't want them. Rasmus is one that immediately comes to mind.
We all know bullpens rarely if ever carry over their success each season because it's mostly luck. I wouldn't put them at a #10 for bullpen alone either
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
