Turn Off Ads?
Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 179

Thread: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

  1. #46
    Member Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    This was the worst Super Bowl in the history of the NFL.
    They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #47
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7,604

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    This was the worst Super Bowl in the history of the NFL.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XX

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XXIV

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XXXVII
    "Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."

  4. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    6

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    I wasn't alive for them, but some of the early ones sounded pretty dull, too, with neiter team playing all that well:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_V - 11 combined turnovers! The winning team had seven!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_VII - Lowest scoring SB ever, with Washington's only points coming when Miami completely botched a meaningless FG attempt in the final minutes.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_IX - 16-6, with Minnesota's only points coming on a blocked punt in the fourth quarter, after which the missed the extra point.

  5. #49
    All Fired Up Revering4Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    NE Indiana
    Posts
    1,509

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    So, can we finally put to rest the ridiculous notion that only traditional dropback passers are capable of leading teams to Superbowl wins?
    "I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it." -- Creek14

  6. Likes:

    Kingspoint (02-03-2014)

  7. #50
    Viva la Rolen kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,084

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Patriots led in XX

    Denver had an early FG in XXIV (Score was 7-3)

    TB-Oak was tied 3-3

    I would just contend Denver, based on their play on the field during the game tonight, did not for one second of the game look like they had a chance to be the better team. Total domination from the first second. As ugly as a full 60 minutes can get.

  8. Likes:

    Wonderful Monds (02-02-2014)

  9. #51
    Member joshua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,053

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    So Carrol is what...only the third coach to have both a national title and superbowl?

  10. #52
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    12,266

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    I imagine Buick isn't happy about booking all these Peyton Manning commercials.

    Pay attention to the open sky

  11. #53
    Member Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
    Patriots led in XX

    Denver had an early FG in XXIV (Score was 7-3)

    TB-Oak was tied 3-3

    I would just contend Denver, based on their play on the field during the game tonight, did not for one second of the game look like they had a chance to be the better team. Total domination from the first second. As ugly as a full 60 minutes can get.
    Agreed. They didn't contend for any part of the game whatsoever at all. AND they were the best offense in the history of the NFL. That makes it worse.
    They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.

  12. #54
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,509

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Peyton is the ARod of the NFL.

  13. #55
    Member Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,326

    Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Mutaman View Post
    Peyton is the ARod of the NFL.
    You're talking about their terrible locker room farting aren't you? Awful gas, both of them. That's the only link I see.

    Except of course that one game where ARod audibled from a fly out to a double. That was a great call on his part, because a fly out was the wrong call for that play.
    Last edited by Razor Shines; 02-02-2014 at 11:41 PM.

  14. Likes:

    Revering4Blue (02-02-2014), Wonderful Monds (02-02-2014)

  15. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,509

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Shines View Post
    You're talking about their terrible locker room farting aren't you? Awful gas, both of them. That's the only link I see.
    No i'm talking about that fact that if peyton had finally performed well in a big game, a lot of folks, myself included, would have had to shut up about him. But he didn't, as usual, and so I will be collecting, with both hands.

  16. #57
    Member Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,326

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Mutaman View Post
    No i'm talking about that fact that if peyton had finally performed well in a big game, a lot of folks, myself included, would have had to shut up about him. But he didn't, as usual, and so I will be collecting, with both hands.
    Maybe but the ARod comparison is dumb. Do better. And what are you collecting?

  17. #58
    Member Wonderful Monds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Mutaman View Post
    No i'm talking about that fact that if peyton had finally performed well in a big game, a lot of folks, myself included, would have had to shut up about him. But he didn't, as usual, and so I will be collecting, with both hands.
    Had finally? As if to say Manning hasn't won a Super Bowl already?
    They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
    He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.

  18. Likes:

    Revering4Blue (02-02-2014), Tom Servo (02-03-2014)

  19. #59
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,509

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Shines View Post
    Maybe but the ARod comparison is dumb. Do better. And what are you collecting?

    Do re mi. Money, that what I want. 3 points baby.

    I think its a great analogy. Great regular season stats, disappear on the big stage. Peyton = Arod.

    What a humungous overlay.

  20. #60
    All Fired Up Revering4Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    NE Indiana
    Posts
    1,509

    Re: Super Bowl - Seahawks Broncos

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
    Had finally? As if to say Manning hasn't won a Super Bowl already?
    And his chief adversary hasn't won one since the Spygate controversy was exposed.

    Hmmmm.....
    "I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it." -- Creek14


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25