I can't think of any examples of paying a pitcher a hefty LTC working out well for the team that did it. I guess maybe Pedro Martinez, The Braves Trio, and some others but nothing recent comes to mind.
I can't think of any examples of paying a pitcher a hefty LTC working out well for the team that did it. I guess maybe Pedro Martinez, The Braves Trio, and some others but nothing recent comes to mind.
WHEN DOES IT STOP!?!?
I agree we can't keep all three of Cueto, Latos and Leake.
But the solution isn't trading Cueto. The solution is to sign Cueto and trade one of the other two at some point. Or just let things play out through the 2015 season, give Latos and Leake qualifying offers in the '15-'16 offseason ... and at the very least get draft picks for them.
I'll say it until I'm blue (red?) in the face: If the Reds find a legit starting LF in 2015, they will have everything it takes to win the World Series.
I get the thought process Mem. But we don't know that Russell is "that good". He's not hit above AA ball. His numbers have dropped at every level moving up the ladder. His defense is reported to being decent but until this year there were even doubts that he'd stay on short. IMO there's enough question marks there to NOT deal Cueto for him. Samardzija, sure...but Cueto is NOT Samardzija.
You also don't know that he'd be ready to contribute in 2015. Just by looking at his numbers up the ladder, I'd guess 2016 at the earliest.
kbrake (07-25-2014)
I hope you're right. I haven't given up on Homer, but I think in 2016, we are going to wish we gave that money to another pitcher.
I just think he will be a solid #3 the rest of his career, which isn't horrible, but every year I doubt a little bit more that he will become a Cueto level pitcher.
[Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob
Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
I have said several times that my solution to the three starting pitchers is to sign one, trade one, and keep one through next season as long as the Reds are competitive.
After the season, I would offer Cueto and Latos a deal close to Bailey's(but larger), and hope one of them accepts. My feeling is that Latos would be more likely to do this, he is coming off somewhat of a down season, and has made a full-time home in Cincinnati.
If neither look like they are open to that, I would offer Leake a substantially smaller extension offer.
kbrake (07-25-2014)
I don't disagree. But I don't think Cueto is the one to move. I think Latos and Leake are. Those two (and a 5th starter) will be much easier to replace than Cueto. If Stephenson and Lorenzen are all that, if Howard comes on fast, if Lively can start finding the plate in AA, if all the others continue their development, then two or three solid major league starters should fall out of that tree allowing the team to reload. But counting on Stephenson to arrive and replace Cueto at the top of the rotation is putting too many eggs in one basket.
Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. -- Carl Sagan (Pale Blue Dot)
I agree, I would rather move Latos over Cueto as well. But, other teams would most likely prefer Cueto over Latos and would be more willing to part with their top prospects. I would not expect Stephenson to replace Cueto. I would expect Stephenson to replace Leake, Leake to replace Simon, Simon to replace Homer, Homer to replace Latos, and Latos to replace Cueto. If that makes sense.
Sometimes in order to take 2 steps forward you have to take on giant step backward. I think if the Reds put Cueto on the market today he would be the hottest commodity on the market and the Reds would have their pick of a top prospect package from multiple teams (including the Dodgers who its been rumored are looking for a SP).
Could you really say no to Johnny Cueto for Joc Pederson and Corey Seager?
I couldn't.
Cueto is the best of the bunch, but I don't think the difference between him and Latos is astronomical. At least not if their contracts end up being a huge difference.
If Cueto wants anything north of $25 million per year, and Latos comes in closer to $20 million per, I would go with Latos. Though the Reds may pick Leake at $12-15+ per year over either.
The Reds lived without Cueto for 2013 for all intents an purposes, and still had a successful season.
Old school 1983 (07-27-2014)
Cueto for Pederson, Seager and Julio Arias. I WOULD PULL THE TRIGGER ASAP. Although the Dodgers would most likely balk at that, but Cueto would make them immediate WS Champions.
Kershaw, Cueto, Greinke, Ryu, Beckett
Trade Simon and Broxton for the best possible return as well.
Unload Ludwick
Put Latos on the block as well.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |