Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 81

Thread: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,115

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    4-0 Giants now

  2. Likes:

    Ron Madden (10-02-2016)

  3. Turn Off Ads?
  4. #32
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,397

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I just KNOW they are going to give Hendricks the NL Cy Young because of his ERA and because he's a Cub. Of course, Grienke had a lower ERA last year but they went with Cubs Arrieta. But this year they will insist Hendricks ERA, even though he won't sniff 200 innings, makes him the clearcut Cy Young.

    It should basically be Kershaw's award every freaking year and the writers should be shamed for years to come for ever denying to him.

    - - - Updated - - -


    Yeah, another. Jay Bruce, Homer Bailey, Devin Mesoraco, Mike Leake, all over-hyped busts.
    If you dock Hendricks for not getting to 200 innings (fair enough) you gotta dock Kershaw way more for not getting to 150

  5. #33
    Member Tracy Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,238

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Cloninger View Post
    I would like to see something out of the other 2 in the Cueto deal as well. This...pitching so much pitching the Reds were supposed to have looks pretty unstable to me.
    They get bombed....they get hurt.
    I never thought Lamb would be much more than a good reliever (hopefully)

    Reed's initial MLB stint was disappointing to say the least. I'm still on his wagon though. I think he'll end up being a pretty good pitcher.

  6. #34
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    30,786

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironman92 View Post
    If you dock Hendricks for not getting to 200 innings (fair enough) you gotta dock Kershaw way more for not getting to 150
    I do dock Kershaw for it, but there's still a more compelling argument for him over Hendricks to me. I think Scherzer should be the winner.
    I dont care, Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. Hes in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.

  7. #35
    Member Tracy Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,238

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I do dock Kershaw for it, but there's still a more compelling argument for him over Hendricks to me. I think Scherzer should be the winner.
    Scherzer's gonna win. I'd bet on it.

  8. #36
    Member Tracy Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,238

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Pretty good comeback there for Stephenson. I expected a disaster that inning

  9. #37
    Member SirFelixCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    6,161

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    The one single game I've ever rooted for the Reds to lose...and they're failing. lol

  10. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,115

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I do dock Kershaw for it, but there's still a more compelling argument for him over Hendricks to me. I think Scherzer should be the winner.
    Exactly. He is tied with wins. Wins win you the Cy Young or else it would not be named after the guy with the most wins ever. Right?

  11. #39
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,397

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    I do dock Kershaw for it, but there's still a more compelling argument for him over Hendricks to me. I think Scherzer should be the winner.
    I'd go Scherzer then Lester

  12. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    25,903

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Reds lead 4-2 bottom 5.
    Rays lead 3-2 end of 5.
    Braves lead 1-0 top six.
    A's lead 3-2 bottom six.

    And a bit later on, games more advanced, same scores.
    Last edited by Kc61; 10-02-2016 at 05:18 PM.

  13. Likes:

    Donder (10-02-2016)

  14. #41
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    30,786

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Ohlendorf loaded up the bases and didn't have the decency to do what he's done all season.
    I dont care, Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. Hes in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.

  15. #42
    Member GADawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Athens, Georgia
    Posts
    2,024

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    I gotta say I was predisposed to dislike Matt Magill the minute they gave him #60

  16. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    25,903

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    A's won, Braves and Rays are winning.

    If the Reds could manage to lose this game, they might get the second draft choice.

  17. #44
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,397

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Go Reds! C'mon #69!

  18. #45
    Member Ironman92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,397

    Re: 10/2/16 - Reds vs. Baby Bears

    Cardinals eliminated

  19. Likes:

    Donder (10-02-2016)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | cumberlandreds | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator