Turn Off Ads?
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 106 to 119 of 119

Thread: Zach Vincej lost

  1. #106
    Member Kinsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,860

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Steve Selsky 2.0


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #107
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,128

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Quote Originally Posted by Kinsm View Post
    Steve Selsky 2.0
    Yeah it was quickly forgotten but some were quite upset that the Reds DFAed and lost him to Boston. He didn't hit a lick last year in Pawtucket.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  4. #108
    Member RedsfaninMT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    1,470

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Seattle just outrighted him to AAA according to MLBtraderumors.
    Last edited by RedsfaninMT; 11-07-2017 at 10:06 PM.

  5. #109
    Member texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    19,699

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Is this the sequel to 'Paradise Lost'?

  6. #110
    Trying not to be that guy
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    209

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/has-...rough-waivers/

    Last year in Triple-A, 94 wRC+. He just hit three home runs. The year before, also three home runs. Not a lot. Nothing that would ever catch your eye.

    Two things Vincej did do, however: put the ball in play, and put the ball in the air. Vincej, over a full season in Triple-A, struck out just under 12% of the time. About 37% of his balls in play were grounders.
    Based on the industry response to Vincej, front offices aren’t so enthusiastic. Anyone could’ve had him, and still he’s no longer on a 40-man roster. He’s not nearly as young as a typical prospect, and he was a late-round draft pick to begin with.
    But every team would acknowledge we’ve entered a weird era. An era in which fly balls that used to die on the track are sneaking out in greater quantity. Maybe that’s about to stop happening. It probably won’t. And this is all still so new that industry evaluations might not yet be properly adjusted. In a 2013 or 2014 context, Zach Vincej isn’t very interesting. In a 2017 context and beyond?

  7. Likes:

    757690 (11-08-2017),Griffey012 (11-08-2017),RED VAN HOT (11-08-2017)

  8. #111
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    8,136

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Was just about to come on here and post this article. Most definitely makes some interesting points.
    "Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010.

  9. #112
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    I just don't see it. Vincej simply doesn't hit the ball hard enough. Sure, they've got one data point that he hit a ball 105 MPH. He's never hit more than 5 home runs in a season. He's only topped 3 home runs in a season once. He's about to be 27. That power ain't coming.

  10. #113
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,813

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    It's amazing how much better Vincej got between September and when the Reds released him. Why, I recall when people were complaining about having him in the lineup.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  11. #114
    Member kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    17,891

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    I’ve made it a rule to never get upset over the last guy cut from the 40-man. It’s just not going to be worth it 95% of the time. Even though at times the Reds may make a decision I wouldn’t, it doesn’t make it a big deal.

    I have too much of my life ahead of me to die on the Zach Vincej hill.

  12. #115
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,128

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    I was somewhat buying into the idea of Vincej as a no-hype sleeper going into last year, but he didn't do anything in 2017 that he hadn't done already in Dayton in 2013. Just seems like org depth.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  13. #116
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    8,136

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    My takeaway wasn't that Vincej will ever develop anymore power than he currently has really, it was more that his current hitting profile in the minors, could translate better at the big league level than AAA due to the juiced balls in the bigs. Weak fly balls are leaving parks at much higher rates than ever seen before, so to me the author is saying it is possible Vincej could get a sizable gain from that boost in rates without actually increasing his skills. Now that is a big IF.

    So in summary, interesting points, but doesn't change my view of Vincej as roster fodder that I don't plan to lose sleep over.
    "Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010.

  14. Likes:

    IndianaRed (11-09-2017)

  15. #117
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,128

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    Kivlehan and McGuire cleared waivers, though they can sign elsewhere as minor league free agents now. Still I'm glad to have their spots cleared.
    Kivlehan re-signed to a minor league contract with an invite to camp, per Zach Buchanan.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  16. Likes:

    klw (11-18-2017)

  17. #118
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,761

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
    Kivlehan re-signed to a minor league contract with an invite to camp, per Zach Buchanan.
    I'm relieved. Thought for a minute that this thread had come back to life for another 100 posts.

  18. #119
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,524

    Re: Zach Vincej lost

    Quote Originally Posted by RED VAN HOT View Post
    I'm relieved. Thought for a minute that this thread had come back to life for another 100 posts.
    You think we can’t turn the Kivlehan re-signing into another 100 posts?
    Hoping to change my username to 75769024

  19. Likes:

    Patrick Bateman (11-18-2017)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator