Jose Guillen career OBP: .322
Adam Dunn career OBP: .382
Jose Guillen career SLG: .443
Adam Dunn career SLG: .512
Jose Guillen career OPS: .764
Adam Dunn career OPS: .893
Jose Guillen career OBP: .322
Adam Dunn career OBP: .382
Jose Guillen career SLG: .443
Adam Dunn career SLG: .512
Jose Guillen career OPS: .764
Adam Dunn career OPS: .893
Raisor (03-10-2015)
Originally Posted by DunnHater
Allow me to just say "wow".
"Wow" is kind of overused these days. I'm trying to only use it when I'm truly shocked or amazed. And around here, that takes a lot.
But, allow me to reiterate..... freakin' Wow!!!!
We'll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost effective ~ Kurt Vonnegut
ok....(sigh).......I'll connect ALL the dots for you if that's what it takes.
Yes, Pena strikes out too much, still struggles in the field etc...But Pena made two very important improvements last year (and others). He actually hit a couple curve balls AND he made a conscious effort (and was successful) at using the whole field beoming a more complete hitter.
Dunn looked like he might do the same for parts of the first month. After that, he was back to yanking most everything to right (unless fooled or late). In the words of the Pirates announcer "swing hard in case you hit something".
I'd rather take my chances on a guy who made great strides in his FIRST year of significant playing time and who his striving to be more than one dimensional then a guy headed into his 5th year who is still the same one dimensional guy he was in year one. Dunn looks quite comfortable and content with being a just a big swing and Reds can't afford to carry that.
Originally Posted by SteelSD
I'm not the president of the Jose Guillen club. But I can tell a guy who (mid year 2003) is dialed in and showing no signs of cooling off. And I favor playing guys who produce over those with the "presumed potential".
Originally Posted by RosieRed
On this team (with its budget and relative talent), I would look at HITTING first when looking for RBI guys (batting, slugging, fundamentals etc..). And if I'm going to pay millions for a guy I better be able to bat him in the top 5 in the batting order.
Dunn and his OBP are of marginal value when he doesn't have the bat control, speed etc. to hit high in the order and take advantage of it.
Originally Posted by MWM
Last year only 7 players had 80 EBH, 100 Runs, 100 RBI.
All except Adam Dunn played on Playoff teams.
It's obvious that Dunn is the problem.
Code:EXTRA BASE HITS >= 80 RUNS >= 100 RBI >= 100 RUNS CREATED/GAME vs. the league average AGE displayed only AVERAGE AVG EBH R RBI RC/G AGE 1 Vladimir Guerrero .337 80 124 126 3.44 28 2 Adrian Beltre .334 80 104 121 3.89 25 3 Albert Pujols .331 99 133 123 4.52 24 4 Manny Ramirez .308 87 108 130 3.43 32 5 Jim Edmonds .301 83 102 111 5.23 34 6 Carlos Beltran .267 83 121 104 2.59 27 7 Adam Dunn .266 80 105 102 2.92 24
What RFS62 said.
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
RIGHT ON! :gac:Originally Posted by DunnHater
wheels (03-10-2015)
Manufacture runs!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's all we needed to make this thread complete.
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
Talk about someone typing just to see what it looks like on the screen! Your argument is so full of holes, you'll be getting a call from whoever holds the patent on swiss cheese.
Dunn is good at getting on base. That makes him a good top of the order hitter, according to you DH(interesting what other phrase comes to mind with those initials). But wait...he doesn't handle the bat well enough...OK, well then he sucks.
Dunn is a good power hitter. That makes him a good RBI man, again according to the gospel of DH. But wait, he is ALSO good at getting on base, so that means he can't be a good middle of the lineup hitter...again, he sucks.
Hmmmmm maybe you could change your name to BondsHater...he has the same skills(GREATER, obviously)....good at getting on base and power....man, he must suck even more than my man AD!
And where did you find the statistic that told you that?Originally Posted by DunnHater
Oh, let me see, that is anecdotal evidence based on your observation, I get it.
Don't forget the SAC FLIES! :Originally Posted by MWM
Youre right rosie scarifices make a hitter into a complete hitter there really important and I dont think Dunn hase too many of them.Originally Posted by RosieRed
wheels (03-10-2015)
I doubt Dunn will ever hit 30+ doubles again (I guess time will tell).
But yes, his 46 HRs and 34 doubles last year (a contract year) were nice. No disputing that.
Originally Posted by westofyou
You don't bat in your 3, 4 or 5 (your key rbi slots) a guy who is capable of 200+ strikeouts a season and who can't a hit a lick with RISP (lifetime less than .210).
You don't bat in your 1, 2 or 3 spots a guy who can't handle that bat and can't run (despite his OBP).
If Reds had the $$$$$, I'd say pay him and bat him 6th or 7th. Reds can't afford that. Spend those millions elsewhere and hope that Casey, Kearns, Griff, Pena etc... can handle the power needs.
He's been given 4 years of opportunity to become a legitimate 3,4 or 5 rbi guy but he still isn't.
Originally Posted by baseballPAP
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |