Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Attack / War against Iran next?

  1. #1
    Glenn Braggs
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    1,376

    Attack / War against Iran next?

    From CNN:
    Link: http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/16/hersh.iran/

    Journalist: U.S. planning for possible attack on Iran
    White House says report is 'riddled with inaccuracies'

    Monday, January 17, 2005 Posted: 8:11 AM EST (1311 GMT)


    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration has been carrying out secret reconnaissance missions to learn about nuclear, chemical and missile sites in Iran in preparation for possible airstrikes there, journalist Seymour Hersh said Sunday.

    The effort has been under way at least since last summer, Hersh said on CNN's "Late Edition."

    In an interview on the same program, White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett said the story was "riddled with inaccuracies."

    "I don't believe that some of the conclusions he's drawing are based on fact," Bartlett said.

    Iran has refused to dismantle its nuclear program, which it insists is legal and is intended solely for civilian purposes.

    Hersh said U.S. officials were involved in "extensive planning" for a possible attack -- "much more than we know."

    "The goal is to identify and isolate three dozen, and perhaps more, such targets that could be destroyed by precision strikes and short-term commando raids," he wrote in "The New Yorker" magazine, which published his article in editions that will be on newsstands Monday.

    Hersh is a veteran journalist who was the first to write about many details of the abuses of prisoners Abu Ghraib in Baghdad.

    He said his information on Iran came from "inside" sources who divulged it in the hope that publicity would force the administration to reconsider.

    "I think that's one of the reasons some of the people on the inside talk to me," he said.

    Hersh said the government did not answer his request for a response before the story's publication, and that his sources include people in government whose information has been reliable in the past.

    Hersh said Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld view Bush's re-election as "a mandate to continue the war on terrorism," despite problems with the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

    Last week, the effort to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- the Bush administration's stated primary rationale for the war -- was halted after having come up empty.

    The secret missions in Iran, Hersh said, have been authorized in order to prevent similar embarrassment in the event of military action there. (Full story)

    "The planning for Iran is going ahead even though Iraq is a mess," Hersh said. "I think they really think there's a chance to do something in Iran, perhaps by summer, to get the intelligence on the sites."

    He added, "The guys on the inside really want to do this."

    Hersh identified those inside people as the "neoconservative" civilian leadership in the Pentagon. That includes Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Undersecretary of Defense Doug Feith -- "the sort of war hawks that we talk about in connection with the war in Iraq."

    And he said the preparation goes beyond contingency planning and includes detailed plans for air attacks:

    "The next step is Iran. It's definitely there. They're definitely planning ... But they need the intelligence first."

    Emphasizing 'diplomatic initiatives'
    Bartlett said the United States is working with its European allies to help persuade Iran not to pursue nuclear weapons.

    Asked if military action is an option should diplomacy fail, Bartlett said, "No president at any juncture in history has ever taken military options off the table."

    But Bush "has shown that he believes we can emphasize the diplomatic initiatives that are under way right now," he said.

    Hersh said U.S. officials believe that a U.S. attack on Iran might provoke an uprising by Iranians against the hard-line religious leaders who run the government. Similar arguments were made ahead of the invasion of Iraq, when administration officials predicted U.S. troops would be welcomed as liberators.

    And Hersh said administration officials have chosen not to include conflicting points of view in their deliberations -- such as predictions that any U.S. attack would provoke a wave of nationalism that would unite Iranians against the United States.

    "As people say to me, when it comes to meetings about this issue, if you don't drink the Kool-Aid, you can't go to meetings," he said. "That isn't a message anybody wants to hear."

    The plans are not limited to Iran, he said.

    "The president assigned a series of findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other special forces units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as 10 nations in the Middle East and South Asia," he wrote.

    Under the secret plans, the war on terrorism would be led by the Pentagon, and the power of the CIA would be reduced, Hersh wrote in his article.

    "It's sort of a great victory for Donald Rumsfeld, a bureaucratic victory," Hersh told CNN.

    He said: "Since the summer of 2002, he's been advocating, 'Let me run this war, not the CIA. We can do it better. We'll send our boys in. We don't have to tell their local military commanders. We don't have to tell the ambassadors. We don't have to tell the CIA station chiefs in various countries. Let's go in and work with the bad guys and see what we can find out.'"

    Hersh added that the administration has chipped away at the CIA's power and that newly appointed CIA Director Porter Goss has overseen a purge of the old order.

    "He's been committing sort-of ordered executions'" Hersh said. "He's been -- you know, people have been fired, they've been resigning."

    The target of the housecleaning at the CIA, he said, has been intelligence analysts, some of whom are seen as "apostates -- as opposed to being true believers."

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,683

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Ah... it is Seymour Hersh again.

    Hey, Seymour... the United States plans many attacks against various nations all the time. It is called "not getting caught with your pants down". Militaries and their leaders have done this for thousands of years. Nothing new. And since Iran can very well be considered a threat to the free world, it makes good sense that our military leaders would do this. If they didn't, then they should be canned immediately and sent back to KP duties.

    Good to know that Hersh needs to tell the world about "secret" reconnaissance missions... to make a buck for himself. They are secret for a darn good reason. Thank God Seymour was not around during WWII so he could give all the secrets to our enemies.

    I'll venture to guess that the same has been done for North Korea. But I'll let Seymour let all the secrets out of the bag. And I'll let him tell these dangerous nations that we are sending secret reconn missions. It is important that we tell our enemies what we are doing. But, to Seymour's surprise I am sure, the Iranis probably alreday know that the big-bad United States is spying on them and their programs. As they are probably spying on us. OH... this is another thing that has been taking places between not-so-friendly nations for thousands of years.

    All hail Seymour... the sharer of secrets.
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  4. #3
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,460

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    It's really hilarious that you look down on Seymour Hersh. He's probably the most credible journalist in America, and one of the very few doing any real investigative reporting.

    M2, if you read this thread could you say a few words about Hersh and the journalism community? What's your opinion of the guy?
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  5. #4
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,460

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    I remember you downplaying Hersh when it came to Abu Ghraib RFA. You turned out to be pretty wrong on that one, maybe you should step back and take what Hersh is saying more seriously as a result.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  6. #5
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,439

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    This is certainly a popular rumor.

    Wonder what Jimmy Carter thinks of the idea?
    /r/reds

  7. #6
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,683

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfaithful
    I remember you downplaying Hersh when it came to Abu Ghraib RFA. You turned out to be pretty wrong on that one, maybe you should step back and take what Hersh is saying more seriously as a result.
    Not so sure how wrong I was, RF. I think Seymour tried to tie the prison incident to those high up in the chain of command. Or at least he insinuated it. He also makes lots of insinuations above. Labeling (again) many in the administration as warhawks. Saying that some were ready to invade Iran at any time. I don't buy it. Especially since it is Seymour. Seymour makes a living off of badmouthing the Pentagon, the White House and all aspects related to war. No one likes war (Seymour thinks some of our leaders do... or his inside sources say so). But some seem to get in the spotlight when there is one (Seymour).

    But wait... Seymour has "inside sources". Ever read the National Enquirer? Every story starts off with, "Inside sources have said...". People can believe in Seymour. Sometimes Seymour will claim something and be partially right, but mostly wrong about his high-level accusations. It is a free country and Seymour can write as he pleases (unlike journalists in the old Iraq or in Iran). And some people will believe whatever new revelation his inside sources tell him. Those people, the ones who take Seymour's word for gold, are allowed to believe as they please. Inside sources don't convince me. But that is why I don't subscribe to the National Enquirer either. But a lot of people do (and a lot believe Seymour).
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  8. #7
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,460

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    I think Seymour tried to tie the prison incident to those high up in the chain of command.
    And we later found out that Rumsfeld authorized torture. So you're willing to admit that Hersh was right on that one?

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...use-usat_x.htm

    The alert set in motion a review that culminated with a Nov. 27, 2002, "action memo" in which Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld approved interrogation techniques that included "removal of clothing" and "inducing stress by use of detainee's fears (e.g. dogs)."

    Rumsfeld also approved placing detainees in "stress positions," such as standing for up to 4 hours, though he apparently found this approach unimpressive. Rumsfeld, who works at a stand-up desk, scrawled on the memo, "I stand for 8-10 hours a day. Why is standing limited to four hours? D.R."
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Jun7.html

    In August 2002, the Justice Department advised the White House that torturing al Qaeda terrorists in captivity abroad "may be justified," and that international laws against torture "may be unconstitutional if applied to interrogations" conducted in President Bush's war on terrorism, according to a newly obtained memo.
    And our new attorney general on torture:

    http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4989436/site/newsweek/

    Gonzales concluded in stark terms: "In my judgment, this new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions."
    But keep thinking that Hersh is wrong.

    I don't think we're going to invade Iran. For that to happen Iraq would have to magically become a functioning civil democracy so that we could withdraw our troops and go attack someone else.

    Iraq isn't going to be a functioning safe democracy any time soon, so unless the Bush administration starts a draft we're not going to be doing any other invading. So I guess that's the one silver lining in all of this, screwing up in Iraq means we can't screw up somewhere else.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  9. #8
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,742

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfaithful

    I don't think we're going to invade Iran. For that to happen Iraq would have to magically become a functioning civil democracy so that we could withdraw our troops and go attack someone else.

    Iraq isn't going to be a functioning safe democracy any time soon, so unless the Bush administration starts a draft we're not going to be doing any other invading. So I guess that's the one silver lining in all of this, screwing up in Iraq means we can't screw up somewhere else.
    I don't think we're going to invade, but it isn't out of the question that we could bomb them.
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun

  10. #9
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,460

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro
    I don't think we're going to invade, but it isn't out of the question that we could bomb them.
    Yeah, good point.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  11. #10
    Glenn Braggs
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    1,376

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro
    I don't think we're going to invade, but it isn't out of the question that we could bomb them.
    If there actually will be something worth bombing.

    Last week, the effort to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- the Bush administration's stated primary rationale for the war -- was halted after having come up empty.

  12. #11
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,742

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Thunder
    If there actually will be something worth bombing.
    I'm not in favor of it but it is consistent with how we handled Iraq prior to the invasion.

    I think it would be a mistake b/c Iran is the country in the middle east most likely to become a meaningiful democracy IMO. They have a relatively educated populace, and they are far enough down the road of theocratic government that many of the young people appear to be ready for something else.
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun

  13. #12
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,683

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfaithful
    And we later found out that Rumsfeld authorized torture. So you're willing to admit that Hersh was right on that one?

    And our new attorney general on torture. But keep thinking that Hersh is wrong.

    Iraq isn't going to be a functioning safe democracy any time soon, so unless the Bush administration starts a draft we're not going to be doing any other invading. So I guess that's the one silver lining in all of this, screwing up in Iraq means we can't screw up somewhere else.
    Torture? What is the definition of torture? Gee, Mr. Hand... I don't know (to use a Fast Times quote!). I would venture a wild guess here... differing people have differing opnions on the definition of torture. I trust the opnions of our leaders on this matter much more than I trust Seymour or some loony-tune Red Cross peon making accusations. No... I do not believe that Seymour was right. Of course his "inside sources" are unknown. How can we trust anyone who will not name their "inside sources"?

    New Attorney General? Reading those leftist blogs way too much I see. Did you think it was hypocritical for Sen. Ted Kennedy to put down our new Attorney General over some sort of drowning incident? Just wondering b/c I must have missed your post that took Teddy to task for this. You weren't born yet, but Teddy knows a thing or two about drownings. He also knows how to swim to freedom... by himself. But that is okay. It is your side that furthers divides this great country. People with morals have spoken though... depsite the claims of you, Jesse, Barbara, John-boy Conyers and that woman form Cleveland.

    Back to the draft argument again? Speaking of WRONG... how long have you been screaming about this draft thing? Better happen soon. It is starting to look like another bogus complaint from the left. Almost Michael Moore like. Those moral people are too smart for that. They have spoken.
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  14. #13
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,270

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Ted Kennedy?

    A guy just went to jail for 10 years after following orders and somehow Ted Kennedy's name is brought up in a thread about torture in Iraq?

    Color me impressed.

  15. #14
    Big Red Machine RedsBaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Out Wayne
    Posts
    22,760

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro
    I don't think we're going to invade, but it isn't out of the question that we could bomb them.
    I hope we do not. Iran's rulers are a threat to us and world peace, but the Iranian people themselves are not necessarily a threat. I am skeptical regarding the chances of a successful "surgical strike" on Iran's nuclear facilities and concerned regarding the repercussions of such a strike.
    "Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams."

  16. #15
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,742

    Re: Attack / War against Iran next?

    FWIW, here is the definition of torture in the Geneva Convention Treaty.

    link
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25