i wrote that, and turned right around and broke the rules on the baseball side.Originally Posted by RedsBaron
i'm really having a crappy year.
i wrote that, and turned right around and broke the rules on the baseball side.Originally Posted by RedsBaron
i'm really having a crappy year.
Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.
Why not? If a moderator sanctions someone, that person could have the right to request that the Boss overturn the sanction. This guards against an abuse of discretion by an individual moderator. It can apply here.Originally Posted by CougarQuest
So sue me the next time I enforce the rules. I won't even get a lawyer. But more importantly, lets talk about these new boxes we're getting!Originally Posted by Mutaman
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
You're welcome to request an "appeal" but if it's determined that the alleged violator clearly broke the stated rules, he/she probably won't have the punishment reduced anytime soon.
Sounds reasonable to me.Originally Posted by Boss-Hog
Boss and the mods here are EXTREMELY leinent. Heck, even under the new policy, you have to violate the rules FIVE times before getting banned.Originally Posted by Mutaman
There is no higher authority than Boss. :MandJ:
Originally Posted by REDREAD
In Boss we trust.
We'll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost effective ~ Kurt Vonnegut
A question for Boss and the mods...
Are these helping the climate? I'm not so sure.
I've seen 3 threads that I've started lately get diverted in some incendiary tangent. From there, the discussion degenerated into a pissing match and the thread got locked.
I have no idea whether mod-alerting does any good, since no action appears to be the result of mod alerts that I submit when things are smoldering. The hammer usually falls a few hours later after the fists have started flying.
/r/reds
Well, I ignore mod alerts, personally.
Honestly, though, they get sent to my home email and, when I can't access my home email (such as when I'm at the office), I don't see them until a 'few hours later.'
"It's easier to give up. I'm not a very vocal player. I lead by example. I take the attitude that I've got to go out and do it. Because of who I am, I've got to give everything I've got to come back."
-Ken Griffey Jr.
Boss's link to the rules is invalid now. Are the January 2005 non-BB rules still in effect? If so, is there a new link?
/r/reds
You're using the same type of reasoning that that one college girl tried to use on that teacher over the term paper (and she was wrong)....she knew the guidelines - the teacher/school has the right to set forth those guidelines. Our responsibility? Obey and stay within them. If not, then we (just like her) get what they deserve.Originally Posted by Mutaman
It's the same on here. And I have come to find that Boss/GIK and the mods have been more then lenient and tolerant.
Personally - I've changed my mind and have come to the conclusion that if they banned all political and religious discussions on here it would be fine with me. Why? Too much baiting and taunting going on due to the deep ideological divisions in this country. They just end up closing them anyway.
Save the ban space.
"In my day you had musicians who experimented with drugs. Now it's druggies experimenting with music" - Alfred G Clark (circa 1972)
I updated the link, it should be working now. Yes, the rules still apply.Originally Posted by Unassisted
Originally Posted by GAC
Now I have to defend something I wrote 7 months ago? Isn't there some limitation period in effect here?
Actually GAC, I suspect you're for closing down this post because you have run out of excuses for the Bush administration. Even you can no longer defend their conduct. ( I think the Terry Schiavo situation was the straw that broke the camel's back). Morover, its clear that a lot of Red's fans are actually becoming a bit progressive and are winning most debates here. Nobody complained when the rightwingers were in the majority here. A good sign for the country as a whole.
Anyhow, whats wrong with a little baiting and taunting? Good clean baiting and taunting never hurt anybody.
PS. I missed the story about that college girl. What did she get that she deserved? Would telling us violate the guidelines?
************************************************** ******
This post was not intended to bait or taunt under any circumstances.
Originally Posted by Mutaman
I think the mods are just sick and tired of having to deal with it on a baseball site. This isn't a first ammendment issue, it comes down to what the guys who get the call to clean up Aisle 4 are willing to put up with.
We'll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost effective ~ Kurt Vonnegut
Baiting and taunting when emotions are running high is akin to lighting a match next to a leaking propane tank. Since we don't want to remove the propane tank, we choose to limit the baiting and taunting.Originally Posted by RFS62
All models are wrong. Some of them are useful.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |