I think he was kinda joking around Brooklyn.
I think he was kinda joking around Brooklyn.
"Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field?" ~ Jim Bouton
I can almost see it coming, and it (Non-Tendering Jimenez) has been one of my bigger fears this offseason. This sort of enhances the chances of that or so it seems.Originally Posted by SteelSD
"Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field?" ~ Jim Bouton
No Way! You go to Arb. and then trade him in July and maybe get a better prospect then Mosely.Originally Posted by MWM
yr probably right. sorry M2. mind is kinda frazzled after a long night of tracking down nonexistent Dunn-to-DBacks leads. again, my apologies.Originally Posted by wheels
Good move in my opinion. The Reds trade an unknown commidity for a known commodity. There is no pleasing the Reds fans, they complain because we cant get a major league pitcher and we get one and they complain.
Just one man's opinion, but I've read and heard too many insane and inane comments from front office types and "insiders" to put a ton of stock in what they think. I long ago decided to trust my own judgment instead of theirs.Originally Posted by BrooklynRedz
So when I see the Angels deal away a starting pitcher who'd have taken roughly $4M out of the budget, my guess is this makes them more likely to pursue some of the remaining free agent starters as there's no sensible reason why one less arm and a pile of freed-up cash would make them less likely to pursue such an arm.
I'm not a system player. I am a system.
I like this deal because I always thought Moseley was overated. Ortiz should do well in the NL.
No problem, I didn't take what you wrote as anything personal. Great job of tracking this down. Seriously, top notch work.Originally Posted by BrooklynRedz
I'm not a system player. I am a system.
Jimmy haynes is a known commodity as well. So you recommend we sign him? If someone is a known commodiy, but a not so good one, what good is it that we know what he gives us?Originally Posted by redsfanmia
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
Ortiz made $3.27M last year and he's going to arbitration. He's structurally guaranteed to make too much money, $3.75M on the low side.Originally Posted by wheels
I'm not a system player. I am a system.
they signed ByrdOriginally Posted by M2
Originally Posted by M2
Aw sheesh!
Maybe there's cash involved in this deal. :
"Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field?" ~ Jim Bouton
"Maybe there's cash involved in this deal."
"You're as like to have monkey's fly out your arse" as to get close to that!!!
(Titanic was it?)
Okay so besides losing Moseley, they've in effect signed two free agent pitchers worth nearly or more than seven million...And Matt Clement wanted eight million?
Hmmmmm....
"Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field?" ~ Jim Bouton
Well hopefully this is a guy who will eat up innings on a ballclub that really needs a starter to eat up innings. I like the trade.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |