Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

  1. #1
    Mod Law zombie-a-go-go's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic University
    Posts
    4,302

    "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Debunking Punk
    What the Clash meant to rock 'n' roll.
    By Stephen Metcalf



    On the Clash's London Calling, the pink-and-green lettering that frames Paul Simonon—red London down the Y axis, green Calling across the X—mimics the "first" rock album, Elvis Presley's 1956 debut. This is not an homage. Where Elvis was holding up his acoustic guitar, shouting blues to the rafters, Simonon has split his legs wide, the better to drive the head of a Fender Precision into the stage at the old Palladium. The Clash were built to smash twilit idols—"no Elvis, no Beatles, no Rolling Stones" had been the band's rallying cry since 1977. The working title for London Calling was "The Last Testament," and it was supposed to stand, according to the band's manager, as the "last rock and roll record." This is the goofy imperial hubris of the young, of course; but it's also utterly sound dialectical reasoning. With London Calling, the Clash merged the arty daring and political sincerity of the '60s with the rage and trashy nihilism of the '70s. Pop music has been many things since, but it has never again been as artistically and commercially dominated by rock 'n' roll. Now that London Calling is 25 years old, an anniversary currently being celebrated with a handsome box set and a lot of reverential air guitar, the time has come to think of their record as the lads intended: as the headstone for the rock era.

    Why were the Clash so well-positioned to take punk rock beyond punk rock? This will strike some ears as heresy, but the first reason is simple: The Clash weren't a punk rock band. Joe Strummer had fronted a group called the 101ers, a pub-rock outfit more in the tradition of Dr. Feelgood or Brinsley Schwartz than the New York Dolls or the Stooges. (Before that, he passed himself off as a folkie, demanding to be known simply as "Woody.") His hokey stage bravado, which so blew away his new chum Mick Jones, was based on Strummer's recent study of Bruce Springsteen, who had been headlining at the Hammersmith Odeon. For his part, Mick Jones was an avowed punk, the better to spite his own sweet disposition. Before they became famous, Jones and Chrissie Hynde hung out and wrote music together. She later remembered his creations as "rather dippy love songs." True, from the Ramones and the Sex Pistols, the Clash learned to execrate dippy love songs and to embrace sonic crudity. But the great fun behind the Ramones and the Pistols had been their love of the total lark, part and parcel to spitting on the burnt-out legacy of the '60s. There the Clash did not follow. They still sold authenticity, wailing spitefully at "every gimmick-hungry yob digging gold from rock and roll" as if that yob were emphatically someone else.

    Unlike their rivals the Sex Pistols, a bunch of lowlifes tossed together by a cunning impresario, the Clash were formed on something of the model of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones: Two white working-class boys meet when young; bond over their mutual love of American rhythm and blues; and found a songwriting partnership. Lennon-McCartney, Jagger-Richards, Strummer-Jones—the mythic co-credits run like a spine through the heyday of album rock. Look more closely, though, and you start to see another, more intriguing pattern. One boy is from a relatively stable, more solidly middle-class home, while the other is from a poorer, less respectable or broken home. Paul McCartney's father worked as a cotton salesman, an unusually solid career for Liverpool at the time and a job that typically went to his social "betters." After Paul's mother died, his father stuck it out—in enduring contrast to Lennon's, who bolted while he was still an infant, leaving him to a carousing and inconstant mother. Keith Richards was born in Dartford, a candidate for "arsehole of England," as Richards would later have it, near a smallpox hospital, a chemical plant, and the reeking salt bogs of the Slade marshes. The Jaggers hailed from nearby Wilmington and hoped their son "Mike" might grow up to be an economist, or failing that, an ad exec. To their respective bands, Lennon and Richards brought anger, volatility, and a certain street credibility, while McCartney and Jagger brought likability, focus, and an eye for the main chance.

    It is a winning pop formula: moody reticence and danger on one hand, innocence and eagerness to please on the other. The Clash were built on a similar template. Joe Strummer was solidly middle class, with a father who had bootstrapped his way up from nothing to become a modestly successful diplomat. (It was while the family was stationed in Bonn, Germany, that the young Strummer first heard the expression "London calling.") Mick Jones, meanwhile, had been abandoned at a young age to his maternal grandmother. Central to the Clash mythology is the public high-rise where they lived, a Brutalist concrete slab overlooking the London Westway.

    A half-generation on from Lennon and McCartney, though, and the alliance has become an uneasy one. The middle-class boy is now very middle class; his working-class partner is now more of a genuine dead-ender. What's more, the roles have shifted. It was Strummer who was more moody, more political, less ingratiating, and less melodic, while Jones wrote and sang without embarrassment the band's catchier songs: the deathless blue-eyed soul workout "Train in Vain," the suburban lament "Lost in the Supermarket." The key word here, I think, is "embarrassment." Early in the Clash's history, Strummer tossed out some snotty asides from the stage about how A levels (the "Advanced" standardized test often necessary for university entrance in Britain) were a conspiracy, when a girl in the audience shouted, "Your drummer's got them," promptly silencing Strummer, who, as it turns out, had at least one himself. For his part, Mick Jones passed five O levels (the standardized tests British children take in their mid-teens) and attended a demanding grammar school from which he could reasonably have expected a white-collar future.

    Now we can begin to understand why London Calling is such a fiercely political record. It's not because Joe Strummer wanted to re-fight the Spanish Civil War. It's because a generation of affluence had split the English working classes along just the lines laid down by Lennon and McCartney. Affable, pliable, ingratiating working boys had been invited in huge numbers to join the white-collar middle class, which had exploded throughout the postwar years. Moody, fatalistic, reticent working-class boys were increasingly being left behind. By the late '70s, the situation had become dire. Between 1972 and 1982, the working class of England "polarized," according to the most comprehensive study of the issue, Goldthorpe's Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. One cohort still headed up into the service class; but another cohort headed downward into chronic unemployment. The postwar expansion had been accompanied by an idea of relative social mobility—that expanded educational opportunity meant talent would be identified and rewarded, regardless of one's social position. The reality was, however, that England was still, in relative terms, class stagnant. And when its economy stopped expanding at the generous postwar pace, the meritocratic ideal came under enormous pressure. Jobs in the professional elite were now increasingly being filled by the children of the professional elite, a pattern that continued into the '80s and, some data suggests, intensified in the '90s. Put more bluntly, education was no longer a fig leaf; it was a weapon by which service professionals could protect and defend the class status of their own children. Here, in other words, the Lennons and the McCartneys parted ways for good.

    On London Calling, the Clash, by simultaneously flattering your ears (à la McCartney) and bashing you over the head (à la Lennon), is straining to keep that old alliance intact. (Into that alliance they wanted to bring, improbably but blessedly, both immigrants and would-be skinheads.) It was a glorious last hurrah for the postwar pretense to a universal middle class. To keep it up, the Clash had had to pretend they were more destitute of opportunity than they really were; that they were punks, not pub rockers, and dead-enders, when the world of decent middle-class living was theirs for the asking. The Clash closed out the rock era, when the uneasy alliances between the Jaggers and the Richardses, the Lennons and McCartneys, the Strummers and the Joneses, could perfectly echo the deep optimism and the equally deep unease of the culture at large. London Calling was released on Dec.14, 1979, in the United States. It butted up against Thatcherism in England and Reaganism in the states. In music, it butted up against the Sugar Hill Gang in the Bronx and REM in Athens, Ga., or hip hop and the depressingly named "college rock." For the past 25 years, these have been the dominant sounds of pop, the sound of the center no longer holding.

    http://www.slate.com/id/2113829/
    "It's easier to give up. I'm not a very vocal player. I lead by example. I take the attitude that I've got to go out and do it. Because of who I am, I've got to give everything I've got to come back."
    -Ken Griffey Jr.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,774

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    I always thought The Clash sounded like rockabilly. And I never understood what people thought was so impressive about them.
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  4. #3
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    41,625

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Context of the times, they weren't Big Arena rock and they had no electronics in their stuff. Disco backlash embraced the stripped down naturalist who wasn't prone to "going candle" on you either, like Fogleberg, Brown and the "California Sound" guys

  5. #4
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool
    I always thought The Clash sounded like rockabilly. And I never understood what people thought was so impressive about them.
    Man, I love The Clash. Primarily because of their range. Yeah, they are universally hailed as a seminal punk band, and rightly so. But they are so much more. On their debut album, for example, you can hear an unmistakably raw, punk-inspired sound in "Career Opportunities," for example, and "Complete Control," which sounds like a Sex Pistols cover, along with a much more refined, almost radio-friendly sound in "Police and Thieves," or "White Man in Hammersmith Palais."

    How many bands--much less punk bands (not generally renowned for their musical virtuosity)--have shown either the desire or the acumen to pull off anything more than the same three chord changes, assuming they even know any chords? Especially on their first album, which often show little range, regardless of genre. The punk darlings of the modern era, Green Day, needed three albums before they could accomplish "Good Riddance,” and five before their opus.

    But The Clash, who embraced an outlaw image, showed both the bold daring of pirates, and a long string of successful raids. As their music became more refined, they helped create a new British sound that inspired people like The Smiths as they grabbed hold of college radio stations and held firmly onto them for the decade of the eighties, holding off the likes of hugely popular radio acts like REO Speedwagon and Duran Duran (sorry Kitty) and paving the way for bands like R.E.M.

    Ironically, during this very same time period, The Clash proved they could also appeal to the masses, with their only hit, "Rock the Casbah," seen hourly on MTV. Through it all the range was there. The same album that gave us their only pop hit also provides the powerfully introspective "Straight to Hell," the nuevo-punk "Know Your Rights," and the sing-songy "Should I Stay or Should I Go."

    Every album rises and falls like a voice on a long phone conversation. You can't say that about Prodigy. Or James Taylor.

    When The Clash broke up, they kept growing musically. Mick Jones started Big Audio Dynamite, and became one of the first musicians to sample movie clips and sound effects into songs. Two members of B.A.D. were reggae musicians, and Mick became one of the first to mix pop music harmonies with reggae rhythms. Through his sampling of movie clips (primarily westerns) and reggae fusion, he helped inspire both "break beat" and "dub" music, which enjoyed varying levels of popularity in clubs during the late '90s.

    So anyway, I like The Clash. Mostly because they were very good, and very adventurous.
    Last edited by Redsland; 02-28-2005 at 04:31 PM.
    Makes all the routine posts.

  6. #5
    Tired of talk. Win! Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Commonwealth
    Posts
    8,319

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    The only band that mattered.

    Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
    Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
    Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13
    University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
    Cincinnati Bengals - None
    Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98

  7. #6
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,774

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    How many bands--much less punk bands (not generally renowned for their musical virtuosity)--have shown either the desire or the acumen to pull off anything more than the same three chord changes, assuming they even know any chords?
    Doesn't that, by definition, make them decidedly non-punk?
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  8. #7
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,427

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    My favorite Clash album is "Sandinista," which is a smorgasbord of everything that the band had to offer. It was a novelty at the time because it was a rare 3-record set, and it was list priced at ~$10, at the band's insistence, so the impoverished could afford it. It's admittedly less accessible than LC, but it still bothers me that "Sandinista" always gets short shrift in any profiles of the band I've ever seen.
    /r/reds

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    8,831

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Sandinista is maybe my all-time favorite album by anyone. Its like a lefty, punk-rock White Album.

    Great piece Redsland but I have one quibble:

    the powerfully introspective "Straight to Hell,"
    My take is that Straight to Hell is an indictment of the modern world's propensity of chewing people up an spitting them out. More "ex"trospective
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  10. #9
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool
    Doesn't that, by definition, make them decidedly non-punk?
    They outgrew punk, and they did it on their very first album.

    Makes all the routine posts.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,254

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Thanks for a very interesting article. I recently saw a "documentary" on cable called "Rude Boy" which is worth checking out. A large part of it is devoted to live performances of the Clash around 1978-79 which are nothing short of amazing and will certainly show you what the fuss was all about. Also a lot of "reality" stuff with the band- Strummer comes off as a decent guy whose life totally revolves around music while Jones appears to be a talented jerk. The movie also shows the conflits between the progressive leftist politics of the Clash and the reactionary conservatism of many of their fans.

    And I'm willing to bet Joe dug Elvis a lot-- he had a part in the movie "Mystery Train".

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,111

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool
    I always thought The Clash sounded like rockabilly. And I never understood what people thought was so impressive about them.
    There were a lot of polarized discussions between people about the Clash at the time whether they "sold out" with London Calling. Personally, I like their first three albums a lot, then they lost me with Sandinista. PIL had come out with Metal Box/Second Edition the same year and there is no comparison regarding the rhythms between the two. PIL with Jah Wobble were the deep stuff and the Clash were dilettantes in the dub world.

    "When The Clash broke up, they kept growing musically. Mick Jones started Big Audio Dynamite, and became one of the first musicians to sample movie clips and sound effects into songs. Two members of B.A.D. were reggae musicians, and Mick became one of the first to mix pop music harmonies with reggae rhythms. Through his sampling of movie clips (primarily westerns) and reggae fusion, he helped inspire both "break beat" and "dub" music, which enjoyed varying levels of popularity in clubs during the late '90s.

    Mick Jones did not inspire "dub". There are different accounts extant, but "'Dub" origins typically start with the instrumental "versions" on the b-side of Jamaican rock steady singles in 1969, with Osbourne Ruddock (King Tubby) being considered the first pioneer who developed and popularized these tough rhythm tracks. I recommend checking King Tubby and Lee "scratch" Perry out
    to discover what influenced the Clash's dub "stylings".

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    3,582

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    I love the Clash, still listen to them quite a bit. I love London Calling its a great album. I think they wanted to be punk but were far too talented to play just punk.

  14. #13
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Quote Originally Posted by Betterread
    Mick Jones did not inspire "dub".
    He didn't invent it, which seems to be your point, but isn't what I said.

    To quote Wikipedia:
    Musicians such as Massive Attack, Bauhaus, The Clash, PiL, The Orb, Pole, Underworld and others demonstrate clear dub influences in their respective genres, and their innovations have in turn influenced the mainstream of the dub genre.
    Last edited by Redsland; 02-28-2005 at 11:26 PM. Reason: Bad coding
    Makes all the routine posts.

  15. #14
    Hardscrabble wheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    7,275

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    Hmmmmph....
    Pray for Rain.

  16. #15
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    27,944

    Re: "The Clash closed out the rock era"

    My fave is "Give 'Em Enough Rope" just for its sheer achievement in sonic force.

    IMO, what was "punk" about them is that they were willing to branch out rather than build a brand name around a given sound. The whole point of punk was supposed to be finding something worth screaming about, getting back to a rawer, more primal energy. No one did that better than the Clash and no one took it as far.

    My take on the article is the writer gets tied up in class issues (which is easy to do with Brit bands and, in particular, the Clash). What he ignores is the Clash achieved what every kid dreams of when he picks up a guitar regardless of his social standing, to be in the kind of band you'd spend your last nickel to see because you wouldn't want to go through life having missed them.
    Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

    I'm witchcrafting everybody.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25