Ced -
Of course, the flip side is that Wake Forest is, well, Wake Forest.
It's akin to being a Cubs or Red Sox fan.
If it can go wrong, it will.
Ced -
Of course, the flip side is that Wake Forest is, well, Wake Forest.
It's akin to being a Cubs or Red Sox fan.
If it can go wrong, it will.
Don't they only hang banners for regular season champs and not conference tourney champs? If so, then UK is still the champ.Originally Posted by KronoRed
Who gives a crap?
SEC champsseason is a success :RedinDC:
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13, 15
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
“Everything that happens before Death is what counts.”
― Ray Bradbury, Something Wicked This Way Comes
That was hardly "gutting".I was thinking more Christian Laetner, 92, was it?
The team that worries me more in that bracket is Utah. Bogut is a likely National Player of the Year candidate and NBA lottery pick(if not no 1 overall). I am picking Utah to beat Oklahoma and give Kentucky a run for its money.
And I also have Syracuse out first round. Taylor Coppenrath!
They do both
Go Gators!
Yep.
Only purpose of SEC Tournament-
$$$$$$$
Not a gutting.
A stake through the heart.
“And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith
2 seed?Now the Cats gotta join my Cards in the 2 seed slot.:MandJ:
2 seed?
How can I help it if the seeding committee is a bunch of idiots. Gonzaga and Washington. Don't make me laugh. I mean my sides are splitting.
But it doesn't change the fact that KY choked themselves out of an easy 1 seed.
“And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith
If you call getting beat by a very good Florida team who also had alot to play for "choking" then I guess we can agree to disagree. But if you want to talk about choking, 60-58 seems like a good place to start.
2 ACC teams in Albuquerque & Syracuse, but none in Chicago.
2 SEC teams in Chicago & Austin, but none in Albuquerque.
2 Big 10/11 teams in Austin, but none in Albuquerque.
2 Pac-10 teams in Albuquerque, but none in Syracuse.
I always thought that the 2nd team from a conference didn't go into a region unless each of the 4 regions already had a team from the conference.
It also seems strange that the #1 seed overall, Illinois, doesn't play the winner of the play-in game. Especially with the play-in game in Dayton, Illinois playing rounds 1 & 2 in Indy (all of, what, an hour and a half away?) while UNC opens in Charlotte.
A Florida team that Louisville "handled" this season with relative ease (at Florida, btw).
60-58? Sure. We were gettin' tired of moppin' the floor with you guys the last few years. Gotta keep the rivalry goin.
Last edited by Falls City Beer; 03-14-2005 at 05:53 PM.
“And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith
Thanks selection committee, the Cards didn't need motivation, but we'll take it. One of the biggest hose jobs in recent memory. And the greatest is Digger and the ESPN gang spending all their time whining about Notre Dame, and telling Pitino to get over it. Worthless network, CBS dominates them as far as professional reporting.
"You're drunk again. No, I'm just exhausted 'cause I've been up all night drinking."
Peter Griffin
Louisville has smooth sailing if they get past Tech in my opinion. I am underimpressed with Wake and Washington. Tech and Louisville are the best teams in the bracket IMO.
“And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith
If you weren't a REDS fan, I'd **&^%$#!!!
---rSquared & BloodyBlue:
On second thought, would you go for a Billy Donovan for Tubby Smith swap?
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote