Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Newport Beach, CA
    Posts
    8,066

    Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/14/bu...er=rssuserland

    Are you willing to pay to read about the Reds?

    Can Papers End the Free Ride Online?
    By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE

    Published: March 14, 2005


    Consumers are willing to spend millions of dollars on the Web when it comes to music services like iTunes and gaming sites like Xbox Live. But when it comes to online news, they are happy to read it but loath to pay for it.

    Newspaper Web sites have been so popular that at some newspapers, including The New York Times, the number of people who read the paper online now surpasses the number who buy the print edition.

    This migration of readers is beginning to transform the newspaper industry. Advertising revenue from online sites is booming and, while it accounts for only 2 percent or 3 percent of most newspapers' overall revenues, it is the fastest-growing source of revenue. And newspaper executives are watching anxiously as the number of online readers grows while the number of print readers declines.

    "For some publishers, it really sticks in the craw that they are giving away their content for free," said Colby Atwood, vice president of Borrell Associates Inc., a media research firm. The giveaway means less support for expensive news-gathering operations and the potential erosion of advertising revenue from the print side, which is much more profitable.

    "Newspapers are cannibalizing themselves," said Frederick W. Searby, an advertising and publishing analyst at J. P. Morgan.

    As a result, nearly a decade after newspapers began building and showcasing their Web sites, one of the most vexing questions in newspaper economics endures: should publishers charge for Web news, knowing that they may drive readers away and into the arms of the competition?

    Of the nation's 1,456 daily newspapers, only one national paper, The Wall Street Journal, which is published by Dow Jones & Company, and about 40 small dailies charge readers to use their Web sites. Other papers charge for either online access to portions of their content or offer online subscribers additional features.

    The New York Times on the Web, which is owned by The New York Times Company, has been considering charging for years and is expected to make an announcement soon about its plans. In January, The Times's Web site had 1.4 million unique daily visitors. Its daily print circulation averaged 1,124,000 in 2004, down from its peak daily circulation of 1,176,000 in 1993.

    Executives at The Times have suggested that the paper, which already charges for its crossword puzzle, news alerts and archives online, may start charging for other portions of its content, but would not follow the Journal model, which charges online readers $79 a year for everything.

    (The Journal charges $39 a year to online readers who also subscribe to the printed newspaper.)

    "A big part of the motivation for newspapers to charge for their online content is not the revenue it will generate, but the revenue it will save, by slowing the erosion of their print subscriptions," Mr. Atwood said. "We're in the midst of a long and painful transition."

    Most big papers are watching and waiting as they study the patterns of online readers. Analysts said that the growth in readers was slowing but that readers appeared to be spending more time on the Web sites.

    "We're always looking at the issue," said Caroline Little, publisher of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, the online media subsidiary of The Washington Post Company. She said that the online registration process that most papers now require for use of their Web sites, while free, lays the groundwork for charging if papers decide to go that route.

    "You're getting information from your users and you can target ads to your users, which is more efficient for advertisers," she said. "This has been a dipping of the toe in the water."

    The Post has no plans to charge now because it would mean too big of a drop-off in readers. "It's just not a strong financial proposition at this point," she said.

    Executives at other newspaper groups, including the Gannett Company, which publishes USA Today, said they had no plans to start charging either.

    A report last week from the Online Publishers Association underscored the challenges facing newspapers in selling news. Internet users spent $88 million for general news in 2004, or just 0.4 percent more than they paid in 2003, the report said; by comparison, they spent $414 million on entertainment, up 90 percent.

    Rob Runett, director of electronic media communications at the Newspaper Association of America, eyed the report ruefully. News, he said, may become an acronym for "Not Ever Willing to Spend."

    The Tribune Company, which owns The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune and other papers, has conducted limited experiments in charging for access, some more successful than others.

    As the battle for advertising dollars intensifies, newspapers are looking for new ways to make money, including charging the visitors to their Web sites.

    The Los Angeles Times charges $4.95 a month for its Calendar Live section, which covers entertainment and provides listings and restaurant reviews, but traffic to the site has declined and a spokeswoman said the paper was reviewing the decision to charge for it.

    The Chicago Tribune offers a "subscriber advantage" program, which gives print subscribers free access to archives and bonuses online. "It's an interesting first step to see how people react in trying to differentiate between the two products," said Alison Scholly, general manager of Chicago Tribune Interactive.

    The difficulty comes in determining what readers will pay for on the Web. Most executives agree that national news can be found in so many places that it would be self-defeating to try to charge for it. But they are finding that readers will pay for sports, if the Web offers more than the printed page. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel provides in-depth coverage of the Green Bay Packers, along with blogs, fan photos and audio reports, in "Packer Insider" for $34.95 a year.

    But for the most part, publishers make money on Web sites by selling space to advertisers, and that is a booming business. Mr. Atwood at Borrell said a preliminary analysis of online revenues for about 700 daily newspaper Web sites showed an average increase of 45 percent from 2003 to 2004.

    But some newspapers want to develop a cadre of paying readers as a second stream of revenue beyond the advertising.

    Bill Keller, executive editor of The New York Times, said of relying on advertising as the sole revenue stream: "My main concern is that, however we distribute our work, we have to generate the money to pay for it. The advertising model looks appealing now, but do we want our future to depend on that single source of revenue? What happens if advertising goes flat? What happens when somebody develops software to filter out advertising - TiVo for the Web?"

    At the same time, he said, charging for the Web site could alienate both current readers and potential new readers, particularly in growing markets like China and India, and The Times would be limiting its global reach.

    Perhaps the biggest obstacle for newspapers is that online readers have been conditioned to expect free news. "Most newspapers believe that if they charged for the Web, the number of users would decline to such an extent that their advertising revenues would decline more than they get from charging users," said Gary B. Pruitt, chairman and chief executive of the McClatchy Company, which publishes The Sacramento Bee, The Star Tribune in Minneapolis and other papers, which do not charge for their Web sites.

    The Wall Street Journal experiment suggests the contrary. About 700,000 people subscribe to its online edition, with 300,000 of them subscribing to the Web edition only and 400,000 subscribing to both the online and print editions. The print edition has 1.8 million subscribers.

    "If you have strong value, people will pay for it," said Todd H. Larsen, president of consumer electronic publishing for Dow Jones, which owns The Journal. "There is nothing so magical about the Internet that everything has to be free."

    The Journal's experience may not translate to other papers. It is primarily a financial paper, and analysts said that it is a business expense for many readers buying it. Moreover, charging online brings its own problems. By limiting readership to subscribers, papers also limit the amount of advertising space they can sell. Earlier this year, Dow Jones spent more than $519 million for MarketWatch, the financial news Web site, largely as a way to attract advertising that it was not getting online.

    When the paper first charged for its Web site in 1996, daily traffic fell by about two-thirds, said Rich Jaroslovsky, who was the managing editor of The Wall Street Journal Online at the time and is now a managing editor at Bloomberg News.

    "You have to take the hit some time if you do this," he said of charging for a Web site. "We took the pain because we felt over the longer term, we'd see the gain."

    Since 1997, The Journal's Web site has grown, although growth has slowed dramatically. Subscriptions jumped 35 percent from the third quarter of 1999 to the third quarter of 2000, for example, but grew by just 2 percent from 2003 to 2004, according to the company. This reflects an industrywide slowdown, said Merrill Brown, the founding editor of MSNBC.com and a media consultant. "There is no question that growth has slowed as the medium has matured," he said.

    "It's a pretty stagnant business for a variety of reasons," he added. "At a moment when big papers are so financially stressed and their prospects uncertain, they aren't investing at the level they need to grow their alternative distribution platforms."

    On a smaller scale, another newspaper that charges for its Web site is The Spokesman-Review in Spokane, Wash., which has a print circulation of around 100,000. About 20,000 of those print subscribers also get the paper online for no additional fee; just 545 people pay for the Web edition only, at $7 per month.

    Ken Sands, the online publisher, who until a month ago was the managing editor of the print edition, said the paper decided to charge for the Web in an effort to save the print edition.

    "We had the sense that a lot of people had canceled their print subscriptions because they could read the paper for free online," he said. He said that as soon as the paper started charging for the Web, in September, new daily traffic, which had been growing by more than 40 percent a year, stopped cold. He said that traffic was 5 percent lower this January than it was in January a year ago. He added that the print circulation had been steadily declining somewhat anyway, and so he could not blame the Web for that.

    "Print is going the way it's going, which is down, which is unfortunate because it's the revenue engine that keeps this whole thing going," he said. "The online business model won't ever be able to support the whole news infrastructure."

    Mr. Jaroslovsky, the former editor of The Wall Street Journal Online, said that some publishers were regretting not having charged for the Web back in the 1990's when it was developing, because doing so now will be a bigger shock to their readers. Also, he said, the stakes are higher.

    "When we did this, we were at the beginning of an investment curve and the amount of money at stake was not as great," he said. "Today, if you make a wrong decision, there's a chance it will be not only embarrassing, but very costly."

    So 'zoners, what do ya' think? Would you pay for the online edition of the Cincinnati Enquirer or Dayton Daily News or the Cincinnati Post to get their account of the Reds each day? Just curious.

    Rem

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    MarsArmyGirl RosieRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,783

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    I don't know if I would pay for the Enquirer or DDN. It would depend on what they offered, and how much it cost. I think they would have to have more content online than what is in the print edition. (Especially in the world of sports.)

    Like the article says, there are too many other places to get free news right now. And I'd rather give my money to this site for the time being.

  4. #3
    Member 919191's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    the corner bar
    Posts
    3,779

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by RosieRed
    I don't know if I would pay for the Enquirer or DDN. It would depend on what they offered, and how much it cost. I think they would have to have more content online than what is in the print edition. (Especially in the world of sports.)

    Like the article says, there are too many other places to get free news right now. And I'd rather give my money to this site for the time being.

    They all end up here anyway!

  5. #4
    Member TeamCasey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    TeamBoone's Attic
    Posts
    12,317

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Nope. Plenty of other places to get information.

  6. #5
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,570

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Wouldn't bother me, IF the newspapers drop all the ads in the paper when I pay for the ink on paper version of it. Can you imagine the number of trees that would be saved just for the Sunday Edition alone?
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  7. #6
    THAT'S A FACT JACK!! GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bellefontaine, Ohio
    Posts
    26,585

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    It's already starting to happen in some form or another. The Columbus Dispatch charges a fee unless you subscribe to their paper.

  8. #7
    Waiting for a tour/album KittyDuran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Hamilton, Ohio
    Posts
    8,381

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by GAC
    It's already starting to happen in some form or another. The Columbus Dispatch charges a fee unless you subscribe to their paper.
    They started that a couple years ago - I used to read it every day - can't say I miss it. Now I would probably pay for the Enquirer, Post, DDN for the Reds coverage, and the Lexington Herald for the obits.
    2014 Reds record when I'm attending: 3-4
    2014 Dragons record when I'm attending: 1-0
    "We want to be the band to dance to when the bomb drops." - Simon Le Bon of Duran Duran

  9. #8
    Just The Big Picture macro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Bluegrass State
    Posts
    6,150

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedFanAlways1966
    Wouldn't bother me, IF the newspapers drop all the ads in the paper when I pay for the ink on paper version of it. Can you imagine the number of trees that would be saved just for the Sunday Edition alone?
    After you throw away the car dealer classifieds, the realtor classifieds, the Target circular, the Best Buy circular, the HH Gregg Circular, the Lowes catalog, the Home Depot circular, the JC Penney Biggest Sale of the Year circular, and the satellite television flyer, the rest of the Sunday paper in Louisville weighs about six ounces. But even of that part, there are ads. I think the plethora of ads for strip clubs are an especially nice touch right beside the high school basketball scores.

    The big newspapers can cry all they want, but their day as the sole source of news are over. If they ever start charging, most people will simply move on to other sources, just as some here have said.

    Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy.

  10. #9
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,775

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Charging for internet access will drive away remote readers for sure. I'd never look at the Enquirer if it wasn't free, because 90% of the content doesn't apply to me. Of course, that's probably fine with the Enquirer, because I live outside the market and most of their ads are targeted locally.
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  11. #10
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    41,629

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by macro
    After you throw away the car dealer classifieds, the realtor classifieds, the Target circular, the Best Buy circular, the HH Gregg Circular, the Lowes catalog, the Home Depot circular, the JC Penney Biggest Sale of the Year circular, and the satellite television flyer, the rest of the Sunday paper in Louisville weighs about six ounces. But even of that part, there are ads. I think the plethora of ads for strip clubs are an especially nice touch right beside the high school basketball scores.

    The big newspapers can cry all they want, but their day as the sole source of news are over. If they ever start charging, most people will simply move on to other sources, just as some here have said.
    That is exactly why I stopped getting the paper here in Oregon... well Sunday that is I stopped getting the rest because it stinks.

    But the Sunday paper was nothing more than recycle bin foddor, as is the Atlanta paper to the power of ten.

    I get one paper, the NY Times on Sunday, no classifieds, na ad inserts that are larger than a page. But no comics too.
    Last edited by westofyou; 03-15-2005 at 09:56 AM.

  12. #11
    MarsArmyGirl RosieRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,783

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    How would newspapers make money if they dropped all those ads and circulars and classified sections? It sure wouldn't be from the 50-cent cost of buying one ... that's peanuts compared to ad revenue.

    Those ads are the reason newspapers exist.

  13. #12
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,738

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedFanAlways1966
    Wouldn't bother me, IF the newspapers drop all the ads in the paper when I pay for the ink on paper version of it. Can you imagine the number of trees that would be saved just for the Sunday Edition alone?

    Are you saying you like trees?

    You are complex aren't you?

  14. #13
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,570

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro
    Are you saying you like trees?

    You are complex aren't you?
    :MandJ:

    Luv 'em, pedro! Except late fall... then I spend 1/2 of my life blowing and raking them. There are times, when I am busting my butt in late fall, that I'd rather have a chainsaw than a blower though. Like the times that I wish I had a rototiller instead of a lawnmower... one rototiller job instead of 50 grass cuttings. A pleasant thought, but one that would get me in trouble with the wife and probably the neighbors!

    p.s. gO bOBCATS!!
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  15. #14
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    11,839

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Our Sunday paper comes and the wife and kids take the ads and Roy takes the print.

    The wife and daughters read all the Target, Gap, Macy's, Penneys, etc ads while my son studies in great detail the Best Buy, Circuit City, etc ads.

    I just read the paper and I never look at the ads. But then, they do all the buying. I just make the money.

    Pay attention to the open sky

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Newport Beach, CA
    Posts
    8,066

    Re: Can newspapers end the internet 'free ride'?

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Tucker
    Our Sunday paper comes and the wife and kids take the ads and Roy takes the print.

    I just read the paper and I never look at the ads. But then, they do all the buying. I just make the money.
    Seems like you've got a very nicely balanced equation there, Roy!

    Rem


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25