There were a couple of Marlins who suspect Graves of trying to pitch his way out of Cincy. How could anyone disagree with his recent numbers?
There were a couple of Marlins who suspect Graves of trying to pitch his way out of Cincy. How could anyone disagree with his recent numbers?
Say what you want about Danny Graves, but he would NEVER do that to his teammates!
"Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn
Interesting theory, but given the way things have gone lately, the best way to pitch out of Cincinnati would be with GOOD numbers. No team would take Graves the way he's pitching now even if the Reds ate his entire contract.Originally Posted by Team Clark
I disagree. Graves is a good pitcher that a lot of clubs would like to have now that he's in his last year of that onerous contract. The Reds can and should trade him but they'll likely ask too much because the teams interested are going to point to his record and lowball it, all the while rubbing their hands in glee and figuring what a great difference a change of venue will make for him. Nothing is physically wrong with him - so I think a lot of clubs are going to hope that the Reds screwy pitch to contact philosophy and poor record of pitching development means they can get an effective pitcher on the cheap that they can easily straighten out. You are right about one aspect though, as I alluded - no one is going to give us much but its possible we could get a couple of decent low level prospects. And brother, I'd take them!Originally Posted by knuckler
This is EXACTLY why Gullet must go. Look at the track record. Pitchers genererally get better when they leave the Reds and they generally get worse when they join the Reds.Originally Posted by Marge'sMullet
Gullett is awful as a PC. What FA pitcher would EVER want to come to Cincinnati with the way the staff is going under Gullett's leadership?
I thought Tracy Jones brought up a good point on his show last night. The Reds chose to keep Larue and DJ in the offseason. They are making what about 2.5 mil each?? And, anyone playing AAA could do as well as they are doing. Yet, 1 Mil is too much to pay for Chris Reitsma.
The brains of this philosophy needs to go. His name is Dan.
They have said over and over again that Reitsma was being traded because they liked the players they were getting and not the result of him making too much money. That came straight from the horses mouth.Originally Posted by 2001MUgrad
And we beleive the Save-A-Lot Reds front office because???Originally Posted by Austin Kearns
But if this does happen to really be true then someone needs fired that cannot evaluate talent.
If they are so cheap than why havn't they traded LaRue and Jimenez yet?Originally Posted by 2001MUgrad
You can't have it both ways.
Oh, I bet they'd love to. Also, they would trade Griffey in a minute too. But, you have to have someone to dance with.Originally Posted by Austin Kearns
[QUOTE=2001MUgrad]Oh, I bet they'd love to. QUOTE]
Then why havn't they?
What happens if Nelson and Bong become BP anchors for the rest of the decade? DanO is not a man of action, but of Jungian Pyschobabble. Bowden always took a easy understanding why he did what he did. Trading Biggs for Kelly landed the Reds Sean Casey and trading Shaw for Konerko/Reyes landed the Reds Ken Griffey Junior!!!!Originally Posted by 2001MUgrad
I don't buy it.....if it wasn't about the money, then they shouldn't have fought the arbitration to pay him less moneyOriginally Posted by Austin Kearns
...he was worth paying in my book -- QUALITY pitching in this organization is a rare thing -- Chris was just that
Last edited by Matt700wlw; 05-14-2005 at 07:17 PM.
Why wouldn't you try to pay as little money as possible. It's called business sense.Originally Posted by Matt700wlw
Reitsma should not have been traded plain and simple, you simply do not give away young power arms who make under 1 million a year, then 1 year later sign a 35 year old for 1.25 million. :thumbdown
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |