Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

  1. #1
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,440

    Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...e-alerts_x.htm
    Ridge reveals clashes on alerts By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY
    WASHINGTON The Bush administration periodically put the USA on high alert for terrorist attacks even though then-Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge argued there was only flimsy evidence to justify raising the threat level, Ridge now says.

    Ridge, who resigned Feb. 1, said Tuesday that he often disagreed with administration officials who wanted to elevate the threat level to orange, or "high" risk of terrorist attack, but was overruled.

    His comments at a Washington forum describe spirited debates over terrorist intelligence and provide rare insight into the inner workings of the nation's homeland security apparatus.

    Ridge said he wanted to "debunk the myth" that his agency was responsible for repeatedly raising the alert under a color-coded system he unveiled in 2002.


    AP
    Ridge
    "More often than not we were the least inclined to raise it," Ridge told reporters. "Sometimes we disagreed with the intelligence assessment. Sometimes we thought even if the intelligence was good, you don't necessarily put the country on (alert). ... There were times when some people were really aggressive about raising it, and we said, 'For that?' "

    Revising or scrapping the color-coded alert system is under review by new Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff. Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said "improvements and adjustments" may be announced within the next few months.

    The threat level was last raised on a nationwide scale in December 2003, to orange from yellow or "elevated" risk where the alert level is now. In most cases, Ridge said Homeland Security officials didn't want to raise the level because they knew local governments and businesses would have to spend money putting temporary security upgrades in place.

    "You have to use that tool of communication very sparingly," Ridge said at the forum, which was attended by seven other former department leaders.

    The level is raised if a majority on the President's Homeland Security Advisory Council favors it and President Bush concurs. Among those on the council with Ridge were Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI chief Robert Mueller, CIA director George Tenet, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell.

    Ridge and Ashcroft publicly clashed over how to communicate threat information to the public. But Ridge has never before discussed internal dissention over the threat level.

    The color-coded system was controversial from the start. Polls showed the public found it confusing.
    /r/reds

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Dunnilicious creek14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Beavercreek
    Posts
    11,774

    Re: Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

    Just proof that people in the US will find something to complain about. Gee there hasn't been a terror attack on our soil since 9/11 - guess that isn't good enough.

    I'm working 60 freaking hours a week trying to make the right calls and this idiot is moaning cause some of evidence was flimsy. Hey Tom, better to err on the side of caution, ya think? Or do you want another 9/11 attack to happen on your watch?
    Will trade this space for a #1 starter.

  4. #3
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,686

    Re: Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

    Yep. Better safe than sorry is what I say.
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    9,072

    Re: Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

    Why not just leave it at Red all the time?
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    9,072

    Re: Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

    Better safe than sorry is what I say.
    I'm sure this was all about safety.
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  7. #6
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,686

    Re: Ridge Says Terror Alerts Were Sometimes Raised on Flimsy Evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Rojo
    I'm sure this was all about safety.
    Yep, me too. What other reasons are there? Oh yea... re-election out of fear. As if Pres. Kerry wasn't enough to scare 59 million voters.
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25