Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

  1. #1
    Maple SERP savafan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    17,561

    UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=8591

    by Richard Lessner
    Posted Aug 17, 2005

    The United Nations apparently thinks it does so much so well, with efficiency and absence of corruption, that the international confabulation now believes it is time for it to take over control of the Internet.

    If you haven’t already heard of this latest UN debacle, you will. The issue is rolling down hill and picking up momentum. It’s being propelled, as with so many UN initiatives, by anti-American grievances, envy and resentment . It all could come to a head in November in Tunis when the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) next meets. If you think your computer is slow now, just wait until a UN commission based in Geneva gets its bureaucratic clutches on the World Wide Web.

    We have Bill Clinton and the inventor of the Internet himself, Al Gore, to thank for this mischief. It was Clinton-Gore who proposed the World Summit on the Information Society to address global issue surrounding the explosive growth in computer and telecommunication technology. In 2003, WSIS spawned WGIG, the Working Group on Internet Governance, to examine the “problems” surrounding the Internet. The 40-nation member WGIG produced a report in June that proposes four models for global Internet governance, three of which envision international government control through an UN-based commission. These prospects should send chills coursing through the Internet community’s collective circuitry.

    This is a classic example of the adage, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” In fact, there are no significant “problems” with the current system of Internet governance. Following Al Gore’s invention of the Internet (well, actually the Defense Advanced Research Projects, DARPA, invented it), the United States wisely made the technology to link computers together worldwide available to the private sector. Entrepreneurs soon produced the Internet as we know it today. The Internet is managed, not “controlled,” by ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a quasi-governmental non-profit corporation created by the U.S. Department of Commerce. ICANN keeps the Internet trains running on time, assigning web site names, managing routing, and generally keeping everything in good order and holding chaos at bay.

    ICANN has done a superb job managing the Internet as a free, open, secure and accessible medium for all the people and nations on the planet. Today, more than one billion people have access to and use the Internet. Under the benevolent management of the United States the Internet has become a powerful engine for commerce and the movement of information and ideas across national and international borders. The Internet is birthing an information revolution potentially as powerful as the invention of the printing press. The explosive growth of the Internet is due precisely to the fact that it has been free of government control and has flourished in a private-sector, free-market environment.

    But UN bureaucrats being who they are -- and petty tyrants, satraps, autocrats and dictators being who they are – the free-wheeling, uncontrolled nature of the Internet is something to be loathed. In the eyes of these sorts, freedom looks like chaos, hence the movement to deliver control of the Internet a UN commissariat.

    Again, almost no one can point to technical problems with ICANN’s benign management of the Internet. The sole refrain that runs through the WGIG report in support of internationalized control is the notion that it is “unfair” that one nation (the U.S) should “control” such a global technology as the Internet. All nations have a stake in the Internet, it is asserted, and have an interest in controlling it.

    It’s hardly mysterious why the “international community” wants to get its hands on the Internet. Although the WGIG report gives lip service to “freedom of expression” as one of the fundamental principles of Internet governance, few seriously believe that a nation such as Saudi Arabia, one of the 40 nation-members in WGIG, is interested in allowing unfettered freedom of expression on the Internet within its national borders. Authoritarian governments fear and despise the Internet. China reportedly keeps more than 40,000 computer geeks burrowing away full time to monitor blogs and web sites for dangerously subversive ideas. China pressures Internet providers into accepting censorship and government surveillance as the price of doing business.

    Tyrants worldwide recognize the Internet as a medium for the free exchange of ideas and information and as a powerful agent of change. They’re seeking control of this technology to suppress dissent. Moreover, the WGIG report also envisions a tax scheme to fund Internet governance. Surely Third World kleptocrats are salivating at the looting potential of the Internet. Here’s a whole new opportunity for bribes, extortion, kickbacks, and payoffs to be exploited. In the aftermath of the oil-for-food scandal, handing control of the Internet to the UN would be an act of epic stupidity.

    When the World Summit assembles again in Tunis this November, the WGIG report in all likelihood will be adopted. The next step will be the drafting of a treaty or convention to set up an international commission to take control of the Internet. Because only sovereign governments can be parties to treaties and conventions, any Internet governance pact by its nature would cede control to governments. The free market, private sector would be relegated to mere onlooker status by any treaty arrangement.

    The Internet treaty is shaping up as a replay of the Kyoto protocol on climate change, the International Criminal Court, and the Law of the Sea Treaty – all aimed at weakening and restraining the United States. Once drafted and approved, a global treaty on Internet governance will be signed quickly by more than 100 Third World and developing nations, as well as most of the EU member states. Then the pressure on the U.S. to ratify the treaty will begin to increase. The UN’s reliable friends in the U.S. will push for America to get on board with the rest of the world and cease its unilateral arrogance and imperialistic control of the Internet. Jimmy Carter and Ted Turner will be activated. The New York Times will demand to know why the U.S. once again is standing alone against the collective will of the so-called international community.

    Thankfully, the Bush administration opposes the WGIG schemes for the international control of the Internet. Even the State Department has been stalwart, making the case that the current regime of Internet governance under ICANN is working just fine and does not require UN tinkering. GOP Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota, who has led the charge on the oil-for-food scandal, also has been raising the alarm on the impending UN threat to the freedom of the Internet.

    Government control of the Internet is inimical to its nature as a free, open, and accessible medium. No government bureaucracy, much less an elephantine international commission, can move at “net speed.” No collection of UN panjandrums could possibly keep pace with the accelerating rate of technological innovation and change. If anything can slow down the Net, then UN control would be it. This mischief needs to be stopped before it gains any more momentum. An Internet free of government control must be preserved and allowed to flourish. Toward that end, a coalition of tech industries and free-market advocates, the Global Internet Governance Alliance, has been set up to promote the benefits of a free Internet and to oppose the UN scheme to seize control. GIGAlliance will soon have a web site up and running – but for how long?

    Mr. Lessner is a former editorial page editor and writer at the Arizona Republic and the Union Leader of Manchester, N.H. He formerly served as executive director of the American Conservative Union and now works for Capital City Partners, a Washington, D.C., public affairs consulting firm.
    This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos.

    If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Big Red Machine RedsBaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Out Wayne
    Posts
    22,739

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    I can't think of much of anything that I want the UN to control.
    "Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams."

  4. #3
    OlafTheBlack Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    2,352

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    Al Gore NEVER said he invented the internet. What he said was he took the initiative to provide funding for its creation and development. But then that would almost sound like a good thing and lord knows Democrats never do GOOD things do they?

    What a biased piece of garbage that article is. Please, I'd like to read a rational examination of the facts of this situation, not the spewings of the Right-Wing Hate Machine.

    BTW, on the face of it I'd be against ANY sort of centralized political control of the internet.
    Sabermetrics can be boiled down to this simple truism: A batter's goal is to extend the inning. Extend enough innings and you're going to score runs. Extend more innings than your opponent and you're going to score more runs than him.

  5. #4
    THAT'S A FACT JACK!! GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bellefontaine, Ohio
    Posts
    26,575

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsBaron
    I can't think of much of anything that I want the UN to control.
    themselves maybe? :
    "panic" only comes from having real expectations

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Shadyside, Ohio
    Posts
    179

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    HOW THE HELL IS CLINTON STILL GETTING BLAMES FOR EVERYTHING? I get so tired of that, like Reagan and Bush I were so damn great, like they didn't make mistakes. Clinton is the Republicans built in excuse when something goes wrong.
    Madness is like gravity....all it needs is a little push.

    Why so serious?

  7. #6
    The Mad Monk Jaycint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    1,283

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Piergallini
    HOW THE HELL IS CLINTON STILL GETTING BLAMES FOR EVERYTHING? I get so tired of that, like Reagan and Bush I were so damn great, like they didn't make mistakes. Clinton is the Republicans built in excuse when something goes wrong.
    Every presidency has its shortcomings. Unfortunately if you lean too far one way or the other the Men In Black come in the middle of the night and fit you with Republican or Democratic goggles that filter out anything wrong your party does.

  8. #7
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,774

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    Thankfully, the Bush administration opposes the WGIG schemes for the international control of the Internet.
    Whew! Thank God for President Bush.
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  9. #8
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    11,834

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    I thought the Internet sprung up because of the glacial speed of the UN-sponsored ISO and it's ultimate failure.

    I have a hard time believing Visa, Citicorp, IBM, Microsoft, Chase Manhattan, Intel, Sun, Oracle, etc. will sit still for a boondoggle like this.

    Pay attention to the open sky

  10. #9
    Harry Chiti Fan registerthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,872

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan
    Al Gore NEVER said he invented the internet. What he said was he took the initiative to provide funding for its creation and development. But then that would almost sound like a good thing and lord knows Democrats never do GOOD things do they?
    Very true, it's aggravating to continue to see Gore blamed for something taken completely out of context.

    I mean, if that were the status quo, George Bush should be impeached for threatening to attack our nation.
    We'll burn that bridge when we get to it.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    8,825

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    The author never really gets to the whys and hows, yet he repeats the "Gore invented the internet" lie twice. Utter garbage.
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  12. #11
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,426

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    The writer is probably the biggest cheerleader for ICANN that I've ever read.

    ICANN has dropped more balls than an outfielder wearing an oven mitt, but that doesn't mean that the UN should be called in from the bench. The UN has oven mitts on both hands and handcuffs, thanks to too many masters with disparate interests. No way should the UN be entrusted with a system embedded so deeply in international communication and commerce.

    At least the business community, pulling the strings of the quasi-governmental ICANN will "make sure that the trains run on time." That's all that really matters here.
    /r/reds

  13. #12
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,737

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    I think the article could have been framed in a way that didn't hinge on US based party politics. I don't want the UN controlling the internet, but this really isn't a liberal vs. conservative issue in my mind.
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Shadyside, Ohio
    Posts
    179

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    Ah, the Men In Black. Forgot about them. Seriously though, I try to stay Democrat when voting but will vote for best possible candidate. I work with a bunch of Republicans who blamed 9/11 and the economy sucking on Clinton. Pisses me off every time. Although, I believe, that all politicians are somewhat corrupt and are looking out for their own interests. Till they ban lawyers from being congressman, no hope.
    Madness is like gravity....all it needs is a little push.

    Why so serious?

  15. #14
    Where's my chair? REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    20,730

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    If other countries don't like the US domination of the internet, let them make their own internet with as much government control as they want.
    Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2010-2014!

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  16. #15
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    55,507

    Re: UN Poised to Take Over the Internet

    They like us as customers though
    Go Gators!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25