Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The future of computing: The $100 PC

  1. #1
    Just The Big Picture macro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Bluegrass State
    Posts
    6,150

    The future of computing: The $100 PC

    Interesting article about the future of computing…

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/index.php?p=1501

    October 13, 2005
    An answer to the $100 PC?

    Posted by John Carroll @ 9:02 am
    George Ou asked in a recent blog post whether a $100 PC was possible. Well, perhaps we are missing the solution because we are limiting ourselves to traditional conceptions of a PC.


    That notion occurred to me as I was reading an article on Tom's Hardware Guide about a computer-on-a-stick concept. The product in question included a preinstalled version of Linux plus a bunch of open source software (OpenOffice, Firefox, GAIM Instant Messenger and some PDF generation tools). As someone who finds Linux to be about as much fun as dancing with a woman covered in 3-inch thorns, it's worth pointing out that it's possible to do the same with a Windows OS…but it WOULD be more expensive.


    Of course, it's not REALLY a computer, as it has no CPU to run anything. Rather, it's just a bootable USB Flash drive that has a bunch of software preinstalled.


    Most modern computers enable booting off a USB device. That's an interesting notion, as you can carry your entire development environment (as an example) around with you in your pocket and save your files to the spare capacity on the drive. Goodbye having to configure a new computer to suit your needs.


    Of course, you'd want a pretty beefy flash drive with decent capacity. As the referenced article indicates, though, Flash drives are up in the 4GB range these days, and I expect that they will reach the 20-30 GB range very quickly…a size where things start to get very interesting. Furthermore, USB 2.0 is pretty fast, and is likely to get faster in future revisions of the technology standard.


    Currently, the referenced device costs $150. That price is likely to go down as time and economics of scale kick in.


    The real cost savings are derived from the realization that a "desktop terminal" can be little more than a CPU, a USB port, a screen, a keyboard, a mouse and some system memory. No hard drive is required, and if one is willing to dispense with all other peripherals (CD/DVD drives, etc.), the package gets very cheap indeed.


    Together, the USB Flash Drive / OS combination plus "dumb terminal" might exceed $100, but the low cost of the terminal could result in the devices getting sprinkled around like powdered sugar on a plate full of french toast (I must be hungry). McDonalds could certainly afford a $60-$70 dumb terminal into which people plug their USB Flash Drive.


    That cost equation could result in there being more dumb terminals than there are USB Flash Drive / OS dongles, all in the interest of convenience. Adding it all together and averaging across the population might truly result in PC costs reaching the sub-$100 level. You'd pay under $100 for your "flash drive" OS and plug it into any terminal, which are commonplace due to the low cost of a machine stripped of all peripherals save for USB port in the front. Furthermore, you'd get something vastly more portable than a laptop.


    I could try to hack together some numbers, but as Barbie used to say, "Math is hard," and besides, the hardware numbers aren't where they need to be yet so it would be a wasted effort. Actually, it may have been GI Joe who said nasty things about the fine art of Mathematics (I was a wiz at math, actually), depending on whether the Barbie Liberation Organization had swapped its voice box. Yes, old story, but imagining Barbie growl "Eat Lead, Cobra!" or GI Joe purr "Let’s go shopping!" still makes me smile.

    Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Where's my chair? REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    21,131

    Re: The future of computing: The $100 PC

    Why would you use a USB device to hook in your memory? Why not just put the memory directly on the card?

    Given enough time, I could build something like that guy claims for $100 or less, but who would buy it? The display would be crap. The processor would be slow. What would you run on it? Why would you want to use it?
    Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2010-2014!

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  4. #3
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    55,703

    Re: The future of computing: The $100 PC

    Check email? can't see much other use.
    Go Gators!

  5. #4
    Member ochre's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,266

    Re: The future of computing: The $100 PC

    Solid state (IDE/SCSI) drives have been around for a while. They are damn fast, but still really expensive. Chaining that type of tech to a narrow pipe like usb makes no sense other than to control cost (ie external ATA/scsi/fibrechannel ports would be more expensive).
    4009



  6. #5
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,453

    Re: The future of computing: The $100 PC

    Quote Originally Posted by ochre
    Solid state (IDE/SCSI) drives have been around for a while. They are damn fast, but still really expensive. Chaining that type of tech to a narrow pipe like usb makes no sense other than to control cost (ie external ATA/scsi/fibrechannel ports would be more expensive).
    Durability and shock-resistance are advantages that come to mind, too. Apple is moving iPods in the flash memory direction for those reasons. If that technology becomes cheap, maybe we'll see $100 laptops?

  7. #6
    Where's my chair? REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    21,131

    Re: The future of computing: The $100 PC

    Quote Originally Posted by KronoRed
    Check email? can't see much other use.
    Yes, what the author is suggesting is basically a glorified pager.
    Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2010-2014!

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25