Sure, the M's might get Millwood...but the REDS might get Gil Meche, and will be laughing all the way to 5th place.
BTW, does anyone think that last year DanO actually meant to sign MILLWOOD and not MILTON, and just figured that if the names were close, the quality was probably close as well?
Just a thought...
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it.
I think it is a fait accompli at this point. There really isn't much the Reds can do about it other than hope they are extremely lucky in 2006..Originally Posted by registerthis
Hasn't that been the plan for the last few years?
All models are wrong. Some of them are useful.
Yep. They certainly haven't been building for the future. Instead each season is simply a one year plan to squeeze out as many wins as possible without any real thought or action to building a winner.
$44 million??? Are we playing with Monopoly money?
Tim McCarver: Baseball Quotes
I remember one time going out to the mound to talk with Bob Gibson. He told me to get back behind the batter, that the only thing I knew about pitching was that it was hard to hit.
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
