Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Local ownership of the Reds

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    37

    Local ownership of the Reds

    As this issue raises its head once again with the sale of the team, I guess I'll ask for opinions from folks who live in Cincinnati and might have a different perspective than I...

    What's the big deal with the Reds being locally owned?

    As a Reds fan who lives two hours away in Indianapolis and makes the trek to Cincinnati for games as much as I can, I guess I don't see the threat of "The Reds might move if an out-of-towner owns them!" as being too credible. Seems more like a strawman argument to me. Am I missing some history here?

    I personally don't care who owns the team as long as they win. I'd rather see a team winning 90 games owned by a guy who lives in Omaha Nebraska than a team winning 75 games owned by someone who's lived in Cincinnati their whole life.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    55,653

    Re: Local ownership of the Reds

    With a long term lease and a new ballpark I have a hard time seeing MLB ever letting the Reds move.

    Local ownership to me is a bunch of bullpoo.
    Go Gators!

  4. #3
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,687

    Re: Local ownership of the Reds

    Quote Originally Posted by joeberk
    As this issue raises its head once again with the sale of the team, I guess I'll ask for opinions from folks who live in Cincinnati and might have a different perspective than I...

    What's the big deal with the Reds being locally owned?

    As a Reds fan who lives two hours away in Indianapolis and makes the trek to Cincinnati for games as much as I can, I guess I don't see the threat of "The Reds might move if an out-of-towner owns them!" as being too credible. Seems more like a strawman argument to me. Am I missing some history here?

    I personally don't care who owns the team as long as they win. I'd rather see a team winning 90 games owned by a guy who lives in Omaha Nebraska than a team winning 75 games owned by someone who's lived in Cincinnati their whole life.
    The Reds almost went out of business in the 30's, Local ownership saved them. They entertained offers to move to NYC in the late 50's and offers to go to San Diego were dangled in the 60's.

    Since then the civic leaders have decided that the Reds are a flagship business to prop up a downtown that rolls its sidewalks up at 5 most days.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25