Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    27

    For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    In a couple of places I've seen both Dayton Moore and Chris Antonetti named as potential replacements for O'Brien. Personally, I think either would be great choices -- I followed the Red Sox GM replacement pretty closely and came away impressed with the credentials of both assistant GMs.

    However, both Moore and Antonetti, while initially in the running for the GM spot in Boston, took their names out. Whatever their reasons may have been (it's rumored that Moore has been promised the Braves GM position after John Schurholtz retires) why would either of these guys choose the Reds position if it's offered to them over the Red Sox position.

    I realize that the knee jerk response to this question is that "we don't have a lucchino" and that they could then have total control here. But is that really enough?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    "Let's Roll" TeamBoone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    12,841

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    why would either of these guys choose the Reds position if it's offered to them over the Red Sox position.
    Because neither of them got the Red Sox position?
    "Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    27

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    But both removed their names from the hat, so to speak, before a decision had been made. Antonetti turned down an interview with the Red Sox outright and Moore dropped out as a candidate after a - reportedly - very strong interview. From this, it's quite clear that neither ended up wanting the Sox job -- whether they would have gotten it is another question.

    For these "hot shots" (and you can probably throw DePo in here as well) what makes our club an attactive landing spot, or rather, can any of these guys be convinced that the Reds job is right for them?
    Last edited by Red_BlueDevil; 01-24-2006 at 02:39 PM.

  5. #4
    Puffy 3:16 Puffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Panama City Beach
    Posts
    13,771

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    I think a lot has to do with the owner and the heirarchy. I'm sure that Lucciano being President (with his meddling background) caused some of this disinterest.

    I think the Reds might be attractive to potential GM's because they have a solid offensive core, some good young players (Dunn, Lopez and EdE), and if a person can come in and get some pitching and fill the minors with some talent they have a chance to be revered.

    But its a legtimate question, and I am only speculating.
    "I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum."
    - - Rowdy Roddy Piper

    "It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man"
    - - Fletch

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Kettering
    Posts
    530

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    i think it has everything to do with the owner. bcast to me is coming across like someone who wants to get great people in here and let them do their job. where in boston, it seems like the higher ups want to meddle

  7. #6
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,449

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    Quote Originally Posted by NewEraReds
    i think it has everything to do with the owner. bcast to me is coming across like someone who wants to get great people in here and let them do their job.
    But he's used the code phrase that strikes fear into the heart of autonomy-minded GM candidates everywhere... "hands-on."

  8. #7
    Member blumj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Northern MA
    Posts
    4,619

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    I think most of the younger GM candidates for the Boston non-job were kind of aware through the young front office guy grapevine that Theo was still hovering. Even so, who wants to be the guy who follows Theo? Boston is very weird. The uproar over Theo was bigger than the one after Damon went to the Yankees. Even today, they're obsessed enough with the front office situation and Theo's return that the whole Coco Crisp/Andy Marte thing is taking a back seat.

  9. #8
    "So Fla Red"
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    South Florida - The Real Humidor
    Posts
    5,067

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    Quote Originally Posted by blumj
    Even so, who wants to be the guy who follows Theo?
    No way that this new young, whippersnapper the Red Sox just hired through a memo as GM can live up to that Theo guy.

  10. #9
    post hype sleeper cincinnati chili's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    10,840

    Re: For Moore and Antonetti -- why Reds instead of Red Sox?

    Quote Originally Posted by Red_BlueDevil
    "we don't have a lucchino" and that they could then have total control here. But is that really enough?
    Yes. That's enough. I think it's VERY likely that John Henry would have offered Chris Antonetti the GM position, had Antonetti not declined the interview.

    He didn't decline the interview because Mark Shapiro is going to leave Cleveland anytime soon. I guarantee you that he declined the interview because he has more power (and gets vetoed less often) working as Assistant GM under Shapiro than he would as "GM" under Lucchino.
    ". . . acquiring J. Blanton from Oakland for, apparently, Bailey/Cueto, Votto and a lesser prospect. I do it in a second . . . The Reds' equation this year is simple: Make Matt Belisle your #3 starter . . . trade for Blanton, win 85 or more, be in the mix all summer." - Paul Daugherty, Feb. 8, 2008


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25