Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

  1. #1
    part of BBN jmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    2,309

    who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    please, no "everyone" answers except of course that's how you really feel.
    i turned on xm radio late last nite and heard some guy talking of how reds pitching is totally terrible or something to that effect.i also heard a guy on espn today saying basically the same thing.
    granted our pitching alone would come in last in the central.however we dont exactly have the royals offence either.
    today i seen my first baseball fantasy magazine for 2006.they said what i have been sayin ......harang and claussen could be something special with continued improvement.they actually rated harang on same plane as the "mighty"( not to some) jeff weaver.so exactly who is hopeless on this staff?

    harang claussen=could be good possible #2 and #3 starters

    coffey wagner= have upside if they can find it.nuxie made comment on WLW last nite if only soto could teach coffey changeup(!) in ST

    belisle= many high on him....me.....undecided

    weathers merker = not great but dependable

    the top 5 guys mentioned are young and i wouldnt put any of these guys in the stinkaroonie category.

    wilson= could be a good #5 but he isnt a #1

    that leaves guys like milton hudson standridge who i would put in the category.

    so while the staff as a whole needs help i think there is at least a few bright rays of hope.people especially the so-called tv experts dont realize last yrs staff had graves and ortiz to go along with the milton's and hudson's.

    btw it was great to see that first mlb mag on the shelves!

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,753

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    You left out Dave Williams, who is somewhere between Claussen and Wilson IMO.

    The biggest problems I see are that the Reds have too many pitchers who have similar stuff and too few starters who are really capable of pitching past the 6th inning, even on a good night. Together, these two factors are going to lead to a burned out bullpen and a lot of high scoring games.
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun

  4. #3
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    25,090

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    The only two pitchers in the entire Reds system, majors and minors, that represent any chance for "plus-hood" are Claussen and Harang. That's it.

  5. #4
    Member Strikes Out Looking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,521

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Make it three--I think you left out Homer Bailey.

  6. #5
    Pre-tty, pre-tty good!! MWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    12,324

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    If Belisle is able to develop a little more stamina, I think he can be a really good long reliever. His problem is he throws mid 90s one day and can't for several days afterwards. He reminds me of Reitsma that way. But if he's not able to throw heat consistently, he won't amount to much.

    But the fact that I'm calling out someone with *potential* to be an effective reliever as an exception should tell you enough about this pitching staff.
    Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

  7. #6
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,753

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
    The only two pitchers in the entire Reds system, majors and minors, that represent any chance for "plus-hood" are Claussen and Harang. That's it.
    I'm not sure you can write off everyone in the minors yet, but probability tells us that most of them (even those who are highly touted) won't ever make an impact in the majors.

    As for the Major league roster I suppose Wagner has *chance* to be a "plus" pitcher, but I've pretty much soured on him too.
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun

  8. #7
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    16,181

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Sorry for the crappy formatting... ERA & IP. You decide who stinks. I've bolded all the guys with ERAs under 5.00


    Rank(IP) Name ERA IP
    1. A Harang 3.83 211.2
    2. E Milton 6.47 186.1
    3. R Ortiz 5.36 171.1
    4. B Claussen 4.21 166.2
    5. M Belisle 4.41 85.2
    6. L Hudson 6.38 84.2
    7. D Weathers 3.94 77.2
    8. K Mercker 3.65 61.2
    9. T Coffey 4.50 58.0

    10. R Keisler 6.27 56.0
    11. P Wilson 7.77 46.1
    12. R Wagner 6.11 45.2
    13. J Standridge 4.06 31.0
    14. R Stone 6.75 30.2
    15. B Shackelford 2.43 29.2
    16. E Ramirez 8.46 22.1
    17. J Valentine 8.16 14.1
    18. J Hancock 1.93 14.0
    19. B Weber 8.03 12.1
    20. A Simpson 12.27 7.1
    21. C Booker 31.50 2.0

  9. #8
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Among the starters, only Harang is better than league average, and only Claussen appears capable of joining him.

    In the pen, if you concentrate on the young guys who'll be around for a couple years, there are a couple of maybe's, and I'm pretty well innoculated against maybe's after the past few years. Suffice it to say I'm not counting on much from Belisle, Coffey's velocity is a concern, and I think Wagner is a work in progress, at best.
    Makes all the routine posts.

  10. #9
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    4,866

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Centralchamps05
    Make it three--I think you left out Homer Bailey.
    Travis Wood too, but I think the frame of reference was the big club and 2006. I could be wrong.
    For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible

  11. #10
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,939

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    IslandRed, someone mentioned that Harang and Claussen were the only good pitchers in the entire system, Majors or Minors, which is why Centralchamps05 included Homer Bailey.

    I would say the guys who dont stink as of right now are:
    Harang, Claussen and Williams.
    Milton stinks. Wilson Stinks.
    Luke Hudson is undetermined for now. He came off injury last year and pitched horribly. Healthy the year before he pitched very well.
    As for the bullpen, there are quite a few guys in there who dont stink. Weathers, Mercker, Belisle, Coffey, Shackleford....
    Last edited by dougdirt; 01-25-2006 at 12:02 AM.

  12. #11
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    55,717

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Everyone

    Seriously, Milton and Wilson are not going to be any good.
    Go Gators!

  13. #12
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    12,750

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    The "Bean Dinner" scene from Blazing Saddles immediately comes to mind, in that just about everyone seems to be contributing to the aroma surroudning the Reds pitching staff.

    Harang had a good season last year and seems to be progressing nicely. The Reds worked him hard and he responded well by pitching consistently down the stretch. I'm eager to see if he continues to improve this year or regresses slightly. I'd say he does not stink.

    I think Brandon Claussen could go either way -- he has numbers that concern me, namely that I think he puts too many people on base and doesn't pitch deeply into games. I'm torn on whether he's going to come crashing down this coming season or whether he's going to continue improving as he gets better at working all parts of the plate to compensate for his lack of velocity.

    Beyond that, it's a lot of fools gold. I'll be interested to see what happens in the spring and in camp, but I don't see any "breakout" pitchers in the group.
    Championships Matter.
    24 Years and Counting...

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    1,154

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    I kind of agree with DougDirt that Hudson is still a possibility. He pitched really well two years ago before injury. Most of the Reds pitchers are soft-tossers...doesn't Hudson have a little bit if zip on the ball.
    Also, what ever happened to Ricardo Aromboles and Bobby Basham. Are they both done or are they possible future contributors?

  15. #14
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,939

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Basham played in Sarasota and Chattanooga this year. He will be 26 at the start of this season. He put up good numbers at both stops with just 15 walks in 101 innings pitched while striking out 88. His ERA was 3.75 in Sarasota and 2.98 in Chattanooga. I think he may be a future possibility.
    I have no idea where Aromboles is though.

  16. #15
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    12,750

    Re: who "stinks?" on this staff ?

    Quote Originally Posted by roby
    I kind of agree with DougDirt that Hudson is still a possibility. He pitched really well two years ago before injury. Most of the Reds pitchers are soft-tossers...doesn't Hudson have a little bit if zip on the ball.
    Yes, Hudson has velocity, but on the whole he is maddeningly inconsistent. He looked good in 2004, but it was only 9 starts that he made (small sample size) and he was already, at that point, showing signs of problems: 25 BB in 48 IP. 2005 did see him have injury probems and, in his defense, I feel he was rushed back to the majors too soon after only 1 rehab start. However, 50 BB v. 53 K in 84 IP just isn't going to cut it.

    Actually watching him pitch was more revealing -- even when he was throwing strikes, he was throwing wildly in the zone and his HR/9 total was triple the total he posted in 2004. He was prone to losing focus on the mound, often letting problems snowball after a walk or a base hit and allowing it to create the dreaded "big inning" as opposed to pitching himself out of jams.

    I was a big Hudson supporter in the past, but this year he's really got to show me something before I'm ready to declare him even roster-spot worthy.
    Championships Matter.
    24 Years and Counting...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25