Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: MLB.com: Increase in Parity Gives Hope to Smaller Markets Like Cincinnati

  1. #1
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    San Antonio

    MLB.com: Increase in Parity Gives Hope to Smaller Markets Like Cincinnati

    Quote from a Reds scout is highlighted...


    Baseball witnessing field leveling
    01/28/2006 11:18 AM ET By Robert Falkoff / MLB.com

    After the New York Yankees won their third consecutive World Series title in 2000, a baseball championship parade through Manhattan in the fall seemed about as natural as the subsequent Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade. Joe Torre's three-peat Yankees were becoming to Major League Baseball what John Wooden's UCLA Bruins had once been to college basketball and Red Auerbach's Boston Celtics had been to the NBA. The Yankees appeared to have the stars, the money, the leadership and the karma to keep racking up championships year in and year out. But the streak ended with Luis Gonzalez's decisive bloop hit off Mariano Rivera in Game 7 of the 2001 World Series, triggering a share-the-wealth saga that has seen Major League Baseball crown five different champions in the last five years.

    Has parity truly arrived?

    "It definitely says we are going in that direction," said Dan Glass, the club president of the Kansas City Royals. "If you trace it back to the last labor deal, you see that panning out. We're getting closer, but there's still another step to go before we get to total parity, where any given team can win in any given year."

    From 2001 through 2005, the ultimate October celebrations have belonged to the Diamondbacks, Angels, Marlins, Red Sox and White Sox. Two high-payroll clubs (D-Backs and Red Sox), two medium-payroll clubs (Angels and White Sox) and one mid-to-lower payroll club (Marlins).
    Five different divisions have been prominent on the championship podium, with only the National League Central not represented. And that division came close the last two years with the Cardinals and Astros landing in the World Series.

    So much for checkbook baseball being the definitive answer for winning a championship. The Diamondbacks had roughly an $85 million payroll in '01. Ample, but below that of the Yankees. The Angels, at about $61.7 million in 2002, even received some revenue-sharing money en route to the title.
    The Marlins, at about $53 million, also received revenue-sharing assistance in '03 and won against a Yankee club that had roughly triple the Florida payroll. Boston, at roughly $127 million, provided an example of a high-payroll team winning it all in '04.

    But the World Series competitors of '05 -- the White Sox and Astros -- were not among the highest spending teams. Houston had the No. 12 payroll, at roughly $77 million, and the White Sox were No. 13, at roughly $75 million.

    "What seems to have occurred is everything revolves around the dwindling supply of pitching," Cincinnati Reds' scout Bill Wood said. "That's where the budgets come in. Can you win without having one of the highest payrolls? The percentages certainly increase if you have the money to create a margin for error, particularly with pitching.

    "But if you develop players and have some things fall right, it can be done. You have to credit the White Sox for what they did. Orlando Hernandez was on the market and not much interest was shown in him. And Jose Contreras was considered a bust by some before Chicago traded for him. A lot of the stars lined up for the White Sox."

    The championship runs of Arizona and Boston were ignited by the dynamic 1-2 pitching combinations of high-priced veterans Curt Schilling and Randy Johnson and Schilling/Pedro Martinez, respectively. The Angels, Marlins and White Sox, with more modest payrolls, hung in with solid talent and then saw young pitchers like Francisco Rodriguez, Josh Beckett and Bobby Jenks burst into full prominence late and provide an emphatic push for a championship.

    The five different champs in five years story has many clubs dreaming of postseason glory as the countdown to Spring Training '06 continues.

    "I definitely feel like there's a more level playing field over the last few years and a lot more clubs have high hopes now," said outfielder Reggie Sanders, who signed with Kansas City after helping the Cardinals reach the NL Championship Series last year.

    "You've seen a variety of teams having success and that creates a belief across baseball that if you stick together, great things can happen," Sanders added.

    While it still might be unrealistic for clubs in the lower third of the salary scale to think about hoisting a trophy, few dispute that the pool of legitimate championship contenders has been growing since the Yankees' three-peat.

    "With the revenue sharing and the luxury tax, you're seeing the payrolls start to compress," Kansas City assistant general manager Muzzy Jackson said. "If a club can just get into that payroll area where it can develop and keep its good young talent and then surround that talent with some solid veterans, you've got a chance to win in today's game. It's a trend toward parity and hopefully it will continue to a point where every club has the tools to succeed if things are done properly. That competitive balance is what makes it fun."

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member redsrule2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Cincinnati, OH

    Re: MLB.com: Increase in Parity Gives Hope to Smaller Markets Like Cincinnati

    Nice article, hopefully that scout can get some actual pitching here?
    Go Reds!
    Baseball Bliss
    Im a normal guy blessed with the ability to hit a baseball. - Sean Casey

Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | cumberlandreds | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | RedsfaninMT | redsfan1995 | The Operator