Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

  1. #1
    Mon chou Choo vaticanplum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    7,181

    For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    A nice sampling in the NYTimes over the last couple of days. You have to register to read them, but it's free.

    Musings on baseball's new amphetamines policy:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/ma...sy_24_25_.html

    Brief look at Moneyball three years on (interesting in light of Reds' GM search):
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/sp...ass.ready.html

    Great article on the multiple personalities of Bob Costas:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/sp...5costaspm.html

    And if you love Bode Miller like I do:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/ma...de_72_77_.html
    (Word to the wise: at first glance, the stunning photo of Bode accompanying the article appears to be an ideal desktop picture. However, if you have a Mac, the computer will, of its own accord and rather hilariously, cut the top and bottom off the photo so that it becomes a picture solely of Bode's torso from his shoulders down to his, um, snow. It will really get you into the Olympic spirit and all, but you want to keep this in mind if your mother is visiting.)

    Anyway, I'm particularly interested in hearing people's thoughts on the first article. I'm kind of in the dark about the general use of amphetamines in baseball but it sounds like it's pretty widespread. How do people view their being cut out? Do you consider them on the caffeine side of the line or the steroid side? Will it upset you if it has a noticeable effect on the game?
    There is no such thing as a pitching prospect.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,299

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    From the Greenie article:

    The use of greenies, passed down through the generations from veterans to rookies, has been the kind of open secret that becomes problematic only when it breaks into public view. In a 1979 interview in Playboy, Pete Rose, whose hitting was always more consistent than his truth telling, was asked if he used greenies. "Yeah. I'd do it," he said. "I've done it." Two years later, Rose gave testimony in the case of a doctor in Pennsylvania who was accused of illegally prescribing amphetamines to Rose and other members of the 1980 World Series-winning Philadelphia Phillies. Professing ignorance of baseball's drug culture, Rose said, "What's a greenie?"

  4. #3
    Unsolicited Opinions traderumor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Right Down Broadway
    Posts
    18,602

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    How the mob never got a hold of Pete I'll never know.
    Can't win with 'em

    Can't win without 'em

  5. #4
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,299

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    Quote Originally Posted by traderumor
    How the mob never got a hold of Pete I'll never know.
    Who says they didn't?

  6. #5
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,344

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    Quote Originally Posted by vaticanplum
    Anyway, I'm particularly interested in hearing people's thoughts on the first article. I'm kind of in the dark about the general use of amphetamines in baseball but it sounds like it's pretty widespread. How do people view their being cut out? Do you consider them on the caffeine side of the line or the steroid side? Will it upset you if it has a noticeable effect on the game?
    I think you have to view greenies the same way you would view pot or coke or heroin or even steroids. If it's illegal and against the drug policy of MLB, why should one be tolerated and not the other?
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  7. #6
    Mon chou Choo vaticanplum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    7,181

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R
    I think you have to view greenies the same way you would view pot or coke or heroin or even steroids. If it's illegal and against the drug policy of MLB, why should one be tolerated and not the other?
    Well, purely to play devil's advocate (because I think my intial opinion on this does veer towards yours), pot and coke and heroin are all illegal. Prescribed amphetamines are not. Although I guess it's pretty clear that most of the ones floating around MLB are not prescribed.

    I'm just curious about this because this article seems to present it as such a common and accepted practice in the major leagues. I would imagine that steroids in a clubhouse still carry a certain stigma of evil and oh-you-could-get-in-trouble-for-that aura no matter how many athletes use them. But the attitude towards greenies seems to be very different, and if they have become something they athletes actually rely on, their banning could result in a real difference in the level of the game played -- or a large amount of high-profile athletes suffering punishment if they choose to ignore the rules.

    Like I said, I don't really know that much about it, so this is mostly speculation on my part so far.
    There is no such thing as a pitching prospect.

  8. #7
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,299

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    Although I guess it's pretty clear that most of the ones floating around MLB are not prescribed.
    Until the 80's it was the trainers who dug em up too.

    The next big wave will be to get ADD approval from a doctor to get Ritalin, that's a big thing in the NHL from what I've heard.

    Plus it's a cleaner and less potent upper compared to the black beauties of the world.

  9. #8
    Smells Like Teen Spirit jmcclain19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    6,490

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    I think I lost braincells reading that Moneyball article.

    I know it's brief, but it amazes me, that such a book can be so misconstrued and misunderstood repeatedly by so many people.

  10. #9
    Score Early, Score Often gonelong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    4,136

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    Quote Originally Posted by jmcclain19
    I think I lost braincells reading that Moneyball article.

    I know it's brief, but it amazes me, that such a book can be so misconstrued and misunderstood repeatedly by so many people.
    No kidding. Maybe there should have been a forward in the book that said, "Billy Beane is a bargain shopper".

    GL

  11. #10
    Little Reds BandWagon Reds Nd2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    3,244

    Re: For lack of actual baseball, some interesting articles to read

    Quote Originally Posted by vaticanplum
    A nice sampling in the NYTimes over the last couple of days. You have to register to read them, but it's free.
    Try this password and login to read the articles listed, 72cutlass.

    For those averse or just too lazy to register for such things, try http://www.bugmenot.com/.
    "...You just have a wider lens than one game."
    --Former Reds GM Wayne Krivsky, on why he didn't fly Josh Hamilton to Colorado for one game.

    "...its money well-spent. Don't screw around with your freedom."
    --Roy Tucker, on why you need to lawyer up when you find yourself swimming with sharks.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25