Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

  1. #1
    Lark11 11BarryLarkin11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    244

    Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    I just got "The Fielding Bible" by John Dewan and it includes some very interesting defensive metrics.

    I'll share one in particular, which I think illustrates the problem with having Griffey in centerfield.

    The stat is based on ball in play data, so the actual results from balls in play. It compares how many hits the Reds got with how many they gave up for each "zone" on the field.

    Here is how badly the Reds were outperformed in 2005. Each zone for centerfield is listed with the number of hits given up followed the number of hits earned by the Reds for each zone.

    **Hits in front of the center fielder: 95 to 64
    (In english: The Reds gave up 95 hits in front of the center fielder and got 64 hits in front of the opposing centerfielder).
    **Hits in the left field gap: 179 to 137
    **Hits in the right field gap: 162 to 137
    **Hits over the center fielder: 34 to 20

    In other words, Griffey's range is not what it used to be. He is giving up more hits over his head and letting more hits fall in front of him than the opposition. By a wide margin. Of course, the gaps involve our corner outfielders as well, but we didn't fare well there either.

    All in all, the defense needs to be restructured so we can catch some of these balls and help out the pitching staff.

    The Reds are a beer league softball team. And, we can't pound teams into submission. We have to improve both the defense and pitching to move up in the standings.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    3,549

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Our pitching staff throwing BP, and our strikeout-prone lineup I would have to feel certainly alter these stats. Gonna have to check that, but I wouldn't say these necessarily are a totally cause and effect relation here.
    "You're drunk again. No, I'm just exhausted 'cause I've been up all night drinking."
    Peter Griffin

  4. #3
    Lark11 11BarryLarkin11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    244

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Quote Originally Posted by KYRedsFan
    Our pitching staff throwing BP, and our strikeout-prone lineup I would have to feel certainly alter these stats. Gonna have to check that, but I wouldn't say these necessarily are a totally cause and effect relation here.
    True, there are other elements. Griffey was also hurt and didn't play centerfield for the entire season. But, there is also a breakdown of Griffey's individual defensive play, which I didn't post, but which matches up directly with the team's inept centerfield performance. He just isn't good out there anymore and he's hurting the team.

    According to Dewan's measures, Griffey rates in the bottom three centerfielders over the past three seasons. Time to shift him to left.

    The better the defensive metrics get, the worse Griffey's defense looks.
    Last edited by 11BarryLarkin11; 02-25-2006 at 11:51 PM.

  5. #4
    Reds Slacker '07 RedsMan3203's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,784

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    I'm sure Kearns can play Center... But does he have anymore Range then JR?

    We all know Pena cannot play Center even thou he probably has the best range of JR or Kearns. Pena has enough problems in Left/Right Field let alone Center.

    I still think our best option, is JR.
    You think you got what it takes to play a real fantasy game? Join me at Jockstocks. You can play Baseball, Basketball, Football, Golf, Nascar and even Hockey!

    Jockstocks Homepage

    Do you have your shirt on? - Adam Dunn to Marty on the Bananna Phone.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,673

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsMan3203
    I'm sure Kearns can play Center... But does he have anymore Range then JR?

    We all know Pena cannot play Center even thou he probably has the best range of JR or Kearns. Pena has enough problems in Left/Right Field let alone Center.

    I still think our best option, is JR.
    Are you kidding me? Pena's best position is center.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Anderson, SC
    Posts
    56

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Better fielding goes hand-in-hand with more pitchers who lean towards more ground balls than fly balls. Average fielding with groundball type pitchers will not get the job done in relation to limiting the number of runs we give up. We must have great fielding up the middle (C, SS, 2B, and CF) to complement any improvements in the pitching department.

    I'll have to check out Dewan's "The Fielding Bible." Thanks for posting about it, 11BarryLarkin11.
    "The one constant through all the years has been baseball. America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It has been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt and erased again. But baseball has marked the time. It reminds us of all that once was good and it could be again." -- Terence Mann in Field of Dreams

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NorthEast
    Posts
    1,002

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Quote Originally Posted by Aronchis
    Are you kidding me? Pena's best position is center.
    Pena's best position is as far away from the ball as possible.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ona,WV
    Posts
    117

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    I have never seen anything that to me suggests that Griffey's defense is anything but good. Yes, there is no doubt that he has lost a step, maybe two, but he still gets a good break on the ball. I saw him make some spectacular plays last year that I thought there was no way would be caught. He also still has a decent arm and throws the ball where he is supposed to. Do you think that the differential of balls dropping in and going over head could have something to do with our pitchers getting hit so hard.
    Line drives dropping just over second are not going to be caught by anyone.
    And every one knows the propensity of our staff to get hit hard deep. I would be willing to guess that a lot of the balls to the wall that were not caught were hit by batters who should not have hit the ball farther than midway deep and Griffey was postioned where he should have been but got burned by pitch to extreme contact empoyeed by the staff last year.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Findlay OH
    Posts
    1,370

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Quote Originally Posted by Aronchis
    Are you kidding me? Pena's best position is center.
    Exactly, the Reds outfield should be Pena in CF, Griffey in LF, Kearns in RF.

    Pena reads the ball so much better in CF than he does in the corners.

  11. #10
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    28,159

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Jr. is hands down the worst regular CF in baseball. Great form does not overcome horrible range. It's not that he's just deficient in one defensive metric, he's deficient in EVERY defensive metric. The Reds are one of the worst defensive teams in baseball and he's the most egregious offender.
    Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

    I'm witchcrafting everybody.

  12. #11
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,072

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    M2, you have to be kidding me. Griffey is a worse outfielder than Pena? Lay down the beer, come back in about 12 hours when you are sober. Pena is lost in the outfield, has a rocket for an arm, but throws it like he has his eyes closed. Griffey still has a good arm, and while he doesnt have the speed that Pena does, but he can catch a routine ball, take good routes to it and hit a cutoff man or even throw with accuracy.

  13. #12
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,309

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    M2, you have to be kidding me. Griffey is a worse outfielder than Pena? Lay down the beer, come back in about 12 hours when you are sober.
    Oh please for someone so sure of yourself you've certainly been on the wrong side of most of the debates here the past month from my POV.

    As for Griffeys's range etc... we touched on the age issue for CF's earlier this offseason.

    http://www.redszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40691

  14. #13
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,072

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    I dont care about Griffeys range as much as a I Pena not being able to catch a simple fly ball. To say Griffey is a worse outfielder than Pena is ridiculous.

    Oh, and I could care less what you think about my stands on things are. Its pretty simple. I think you are wrong. You dont care either, right? Glad we got that straightened out.

  15. #14
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,309

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    Its pretty simple.
    Well, you are right about that.

  16. #15
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,072

    Re: Griffey and Defense (or lack thereof)

    So WOY, Wily Mo Pena is a better defensive player than Ken Griffey Jr?


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25