Duane Clemons is about as safe a bet as anyone to be gone in 2006. Also, Marvin and Bresnahan are on record multiple times saying they will not be switching to a 3-4 (Marvin prefers a DE rushing the QB vs. an extra LB late in the game).
Duane Clemons is about as safe a bet as anyone to be gone in 2006. Also, Marvin and Bresnahan are on record multiple times saying they will not be switching to a 3-4 (Marvin prefers a DE rushing the QB vs. an extra LB late in the game).
It would help if we had a quality DE to rush the QB.Originally Posted by Boss-Hog
As far as Sam Adams goes.
Always a good decision.
Brilliant!
As far as Sam Adams goes.
Always a good decision.
Last edited by max venable; 03-06-2006 at 07:17 AM.
For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism.
I agree. I think DE is nearly as big a weak spot on our defense as our tackles.
I wouldn't get too worked up Adams. We've heard this song and dance from him before.
He claimed to be all fired up to come and play for Marvin is 2003, but when it came time to sign, he used the Bengals interest as leverage in procuring a bigger contract from the Bills. The guy is a mercenary and I fully expect him to use the Bengals as leverage once again.
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote