Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 58

Thread: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

  1. #16
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    EE needs to learn to bunt.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    EdE should never be handed the position so that he continues to homer every day.

  4. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    Posts
    362

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    2-1 Reds after 4

    Craig Wilson took Burns deep.

  5. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Lambertville, MI
    Posts
    244

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    I for one would like to know which scrappy, table-setter was on in front of this young, snot nose trying to learn how to play the game right. This kid is hard-headed, I tell you. He'll never learn hitting balls out of the park left and right. <sigh> kids...

  6. #20
    Member traderumor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Columbus, OH area
    Posts
    19,924

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Rover
    2-1 Reds after 4

    Craig Wilson took Burns deep.
    Wilson even beats us up in ST
    "Rounding 3rd and heading for home, good night everybody"

  7. #21
    Member RollyInRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    15,738

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    I don't understand all the snideness when it comes to Encarnacion. I don't think anyone is unhappy with his performance. I think it's what everyone has been hoping for. Looks like the kid is stepping up. Keep it up, Eddie. Win your position on performance.

  8. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    I don't understand all the snideness when it comes to Encarnacion. I don't think anyone is unhappy with his performance. I think it's what everyone has been hoping for. Looks like the kid is stepping up. Keep it up, Eddie. Win your position on performance.
    People agree with you. It's all sarcasm.

  9. #23
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,821

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Quote Originally Posted by RANDY IN CHAR NC
    I don't understand all the snideness when it comes to Encarnacion. I don't think anyone is unhappy with his performance. I think it's what everyone has been hoping for.
    Well, I wouldn't say everyone. :aurilia:
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  10. #24
    Lover of Trivialities Doc. Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Worthington, OH
    Posts
    6,193

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Honestly, I can't see how Narron can avoid making Encarnacion the starter from what we've seen so far.

    Mike Burns apparently threw a strike to Craig Wilson, whose homer cut the Reds' lead to 2-1 (middle of 6).

  11. #25
    Lover of Trivialities Doc. Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Worthington, OH
    Posts
    6,193

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R
    Well, I wouldn't say everyone. :aurilia:
    Hey, he's a team guy now, remember? He even has a first baseman's mitt. I've been feeling like I need to retire that Roman emperor-esque nickname I gave him last year.

  12. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Lambertville, MI
    Posts
    244

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    I can't speak for the rest, Randy, but I am just having fun joining in and poking at a theme that has been going on for awhile. Nothing offensive meant by it. I agree - I am sure Narron, et al, recognize what is going on right now in re: to EE and the 3B position. Just having fun with re: to the quotes that have come from Narron recently.

  13. #27
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    45,909

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve
    People agree with you. It's all sarcasm.
    Exactly. Plus, there's still that hangover from Felipe getting horked last spring.

    In this case I think it's particularly good-natured sarcasm because it's starting to look like a mortal lock that EdE's getting the 3B job.
    I'm not a system player. I am a system.

  14. #28
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,821

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc. Scott
    Hey, he's a team guy now, remember? He even has a first baseman's mitt. I've been feeling like I need to retire that Roman emperor-esque nickname I gave him last year.
    Rich will be happy no matter where he is playing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  15. #29
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,450

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc. Scott
    Hey, he's a team guy now, remember? He even has a first baseman's mitt. I've been feeling like I need to retire that Roman emperor-esque nickname I gave him last year.
    I took those comments to mean that Rich saw Encarnacion was gonna rake and outplay him defensively and though "oh crap, if I don't play the team-player card soon, I'm gonna get punked..."
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  16. #30
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    13,821

    Re: 3-9 Reds vs Bucs

    Echo others, I read the postings re: EE's hot start as saracsm that we have had to be rooting for that so that he doesn't lose his spot.

    And, really, at least the comments here make some sense. I couldn't resist responding to a couple at Lancaster's site that are critical of EE for hitting too many homeruns and say that he should be concentrating on oppostite field singles.

    At least that view hasn't shown up here as of yet...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator