Turn Off Ads?
Page 4 of 15 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 218

Thread: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

  1. #46
    Member Spitball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    5,642

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by IslandRed
    The other thing that affected the situation is that Pena's already into his arbitration years. When or if he breaks out, his price tag will reflect it. Sadly, his days as a source of cheap power are about over. And if he's like Sosa and doesn't have his breakout until his late 20s, what good does that do the Reds if he's already eligible for free agency or about to be?
    Good point. The Arroyo trade might not work out in the long run, but it hopefully signifies a change in direction for this franchise. A movement away from building this team around a core of stud outfielders to a team recognizing the need for pitching.

    Trading Pena might be a gamble, but a gamble that needed to be made. Dang it, let's not be Dan O'Brien-ish about this, so what if Pena turns into Sammy Sosa? Would you want to invest big bucks to keep the next Sammy Sosa in Cincinnati so the Reds could continue to have chump change left over for pitching? I'd rather invest big bucks on pitching and have chump change left over to pay outfielders.
    "I am your child from the future. I'm sorry I didn't tell you this earlier." - Dylan Easton


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    so what if Pena turns into Sammy Sosa?
    then it was a very bad trade. Especially since he's still pretty cheap.

  4. #48
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,209

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by princeton
    then it was a very bad trade. Especially since he's still pretty cheap.
    Not if it takes him four more years to crack his lead pupa.
    “And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith

  5. #49
    Member pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    15,241

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF
    Maybe he isn't Sosa. Mybe he's Ruben Sierra. I prefer Sierra to the next Esteban Loaiza.
    and maybe he's tony batista without the glove.
    School's out. What did you expect?

  6. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
    Not if it takes him four more years to crack his lead pupa.
    apparently that didn't need to go without saying

  7. #51
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,209

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by princeton
    apparently that didn't need to go without saying
    Right. Because you made the qualification that he's cheap for now. In four years you'll be paying him at a Sosa level even if he's producing at his current rate.

    I think my qualification is absolutely paramount to the discussion--it's not whether Pena becomes the next Sosa, it's when. Really nothing else matters.

    Boston admires him so much, they're platooning him.
    “And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith

  8. #52
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    62,142

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro
    and maybe he's tony batista without the glove.
    If he could play 3rd we'd have kept him
    Go Gators!

  9. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
    Right. Because you made the qualification that he's cheap for now..

    that's why it seemed to go without saying. It was already said

  10. #54
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro
    and maybe he's tony batista without the glove.
    Then what is Arroyo? He seems very Haynesish right now. doesn't K anyone, flyball pitcher.

    I think Fenway was huge for him. Unless a lefty yanked it down the line he had the advantage. CF will keep balls in the park, and he was good against righties.

    GABP offers no such protection.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  11. #55
    Member traderumor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Columbus, OH area
    Posts
    19,924

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Does a 50/50 split of GO/AO make someone a flyball pitcher?

  12. #56
    Mailing it in Cyclone792's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,828

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF
    I think Fenway was huge for him.
    Ummm ...

    Code:
    Arroyo 2003-2005
    
    Fenway IP    198.2
    Road IP      202.2
    
    Fenway ERA    4.94
    Road ERA      3.48
    
    Fenway K/9    5.35
    Road K/9      6.13
     
    Fenway BB/9   2.54
    Road BB/9     2.18
    
    Fenway HR/9   1.04
    Road HR/9     0.71
    The Lost Decade Average Season: 74-88
    2014-22 Average Season: 71-91

  13. #57
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    I think Fenway was huge for him. Unless a lefty yanked it down the line he had the advantage.
    How can it be huge for him? Unless you factor in the LH HR rate at Fenway.

    If he does worst against LH's it hurt him more.

    Fenway against RH since 2003 rates as a 103 RH Hits/ 113 RH HR while LH is 103 LH HIT and 85 LH HR.

    He gave up 15 HR's at Fenway in 2005 and 9 in 2004.

  14. #58
    Mailing it in Cyclone792's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,828

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    I'll just toss this in for good measure ...

    http://www.redszone.com/forums/showp...65&postcount=2

    Quote Originally Posted by vermonter
    He tends to keep the ball in the park fairly well, but he was absolutely destroyed by doubles off the Monstah. His home/road and RHP/LHP are quite normal for a right-handed pitcher, except for his doubles rates. Here are his 2004 splits for doubles:

    [PHP]Home: .078
    Road: .048
    Right .073
    Left: .064[/PHP]
    The Lost Decade Average Season: 74-88
    2014-22 Average Season: 71-91

  15. #59
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Because Fenway supresses HR's or at least it did last year, and GABP welcomes them like a mother does a son returning from war. BTW, how was breakfast?
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  16. #60
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: BP: Reds Transaction Analysis-Wily Mo Pena, Ross etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF
    Because Fenway supresses HR's or at least it did last year, and GABP welcomes them like a mother does a son returning from war. BTW, how was breakfast?
    Fenway suppressed only LH HR's (90 out of 100) for visitors from 2003-2005, the Red Sox themselves scored a 127/100 in those years from the left side, the supressed number looks like it's being generated by the Red Sox pitchers.

    The RH was 155 Red Sox and 118 Opponents..

    Breakfast was fine, the post office worst and when I got home there was a peacock on my front porch eating cat food.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator