I would say Griffey, Dunn, or Freel.
I would say Griffey, Dunn, or Freel.
Its about to get ugly in here. I would edit ur post and take out Dunn.
I would say about anyone other than Dunn, Lopez or Encarnacion. But I believe there are going to be a lot of moves even before the deadline
I'm not saying who should but who would.Originally Posted by Shaknb8k
Are you really suggesting that someone edit their post because you disagree with it?Originally Posted by Shaknb8k
"Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself."--Winston Churchill
I don't think we need to worry about this until July. Plus, if the Reds are in contention at that point, a couple of minor league prospects may be available to deal (the Reds may have a few by then).
Hacktastic: The Story of the 2014 Cincinnati Reds
I think Freel, Kearns and LaRue are the most viable candidates. If Kearns keeps playing at his current level, he can fetch a good young pitcher at the trading deadline.
"Hyperbole is the greatest thing ever" Redsland
I just think it's telling that for all of Dunn's accomplishments (and yes there are many as much as I do bash him), the Reds were only able to lock him in for two years. Is he going to become overpriced? Do they see holes in his game that make them unwilling to commit much more to him at this time?
Actually he's here for 3 years.Originally Posted by Handofdeath
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.
If we are in the play-off run why are we trading Dunn?????
And if we are gearing up for the play-off run aren't we going to be buying from bottom-feeder teams. If that's the case why would Griffey be attractive to them?
If we are in the hunt, guys like Homer/Votto (and other prospects) would be the main trade bait. I wouldn't do anything crazy because this likely wont be the big WS year.
You gotta stay the course and not blow your load just b/c you think you might make the playoffs for 1 year. The Reds don't have those kinda resources, so they need to maintain the status quo. If we're still contending in July, then you really just need to see what we have in surplus (right now catchers and utility infielders) and move some of that. We did that with WMP b/c at the time we had a surplus of OF, so it made sense to move an OF to get an arm back. If we're still looking similar to this roster in July, then you have the choice of Ross/LaRue/Valentin and then Womack/Aurillia/Hatteberg/Freel.
You guys may be forgetting something about griffey....If we are in contention he's going to veto any trade that he may be in.....
THE University of Cincinnati
I heart Freel, but his trade value is never going to be higher.
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures."
Right. And not at the deadline. RIGHT NOW. That's part of the problem with this club, is that it sits on its commodities while they rot.Originally Posted by Raisor
And especially with Griffey coming off the DL on Friday and Brandon Phillips needing everyday playing time to develop, at this point in his career.Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
Ryan Freel is a man without a position, and at a point in his career where his trade value has nowhere to go but down.
Trouble is, who has pitching to give up?
24 Years and Counting...
Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor
That's the key. The Reds need a partner for a "baseball" trade. Surplus relief pitcher for a leadoff guy. I don't see a viable starting pitcher unless we package Larue or Kearns with Freel. Unfortunately most teams are unwilling to make this kind of trade so early. Gotta see what shakes out first.
My feeling is that a trade may happen in a month, but not before, and if one were to occur before, we would not be happy with the results. The Reds wanting to trade when other teams need to be talked into it does not bode well for a good trade for the Reds.
Thank goodness for baseball.