Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    3,072

    Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    I hope it's never sunny in Philly again.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Tired of talk. Win! Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Commonwealth
    Posts
    8,346

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    IIRC it was indeed.

    Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
    Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
    Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13
    University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
    Cincinnati Bengals - None
    Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98

  4. #3
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Yes it was, at least in the regular season for sure!
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  5. #4
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    55,572

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Hope they don't make it a regular occurrence.
    Go Gators!

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,385

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Quote Originally Posted by KronoRed
    Hope they don't make it a regular occurrence.
    I do; I'd rather see him where his erratic throwing would be less harmful, say at 1B of even LF.

    From an earlier post of mine in another thread:
    "...To get the best gloves in the game against LH starters (in the AL parks) I'd like to see:
    1B-DUNN
    2B-PHILLIPS
    SS-LOPEZ
    3B-AURILIA
    LF-ENCARNACION
    CF-FREEL
    RF-KEARNS
    C-LARUE
    DH-GRIFFEY

    Putting EE in LF... is a leap of faith without having played there in ST, but sight unseen, and considering his athleticism, I'd predict equal or better results than from Dunn, even a better arm. Based on the terrible record of the Reds' defense so far, these are the 8 position players I'd prefer if I were a Reds' pitcher."

    Pedro in the next post then astutely asked: "We're going to get the best gloves into the game by putting a player at a position he has never played before and putting a statue at 3B?"

    Yes, but I'd love to see EE given some practice time in the OF before he was sent out there in a real game.

    And if Pedro wonders about a statue at the hot corner, well, the Reds had one of those of the Mayor at the other corner for years. We just don't want the statues on the middle infield.

  7. #6
    The Lineups stink. KronoRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    West N. Carolina
    Posts
    55,572

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    EE is way too young to move permanently.
    Go Gators!

  8. #7
    Worst Behavior. reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,268

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Lol ok chalk up aother one to the list.

    Dunn to 1st
    Griffey to LF
    EE to LF
    Phillips to SS
    Felipe to 2B
    Freel to CF

    do I have it all?

  9. #8
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    34,888

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44
    Lol ok chalk up aother one to the list.

    Dunn to 1st
    Griffey to LF
    EE to LF
    Phillips to SS
    Felipe to 2B
    Freel to CF

    do I have it all?
    No. We have these:
    Griffey to 1B
    EE to 1B
    Coffey to closer
    Me to manager

    Ok so I added that last one in myself, but hey it would be sweet.

  10. #9
    smells of rich mahogany deltachi8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,001

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Moving EE would be completely insane. He has exceptional range for a 3B, he saves more with his range than his arm lets in. Just does not show up in the box score. His arm is strong and he needs work - he wont get that at LF or 1b.

    You want to move someone to 1b, make it Dunn, they way it should have been all along.
    Nothing to see here. Please disperse.

  11. #10
    "Let's Roll" TeamBoone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    12,841

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Quote Originally Posted by KronoRed
    EE is way too young to move permanently.
    Totally agree.

    He IS the Reds future third baseman and has to take his lumps at the major league level just like any other young player making the adjustment from the minors to the majors. He needs to play 3B... period.
    "Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn

  12. #11
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: Wait, so was that inning stint at 1B the first for Encarnacion?

    Totally agree.

    He IS the Reds future third baseman and has to take his lumps at the major league level just like any other young player making the adjustment from the minors to the majors. He needs to play 3B... period.
    Without question he should continue on at 3rd! I think something that's lost in most of the error arguments (w/ or w/o EE) is that people tend to overlook the fact if you have great range you get to more balls thus more chances of making a bad throw. Most every good third basemen I have seen or heard about had his problems early on.

    Case in point:

    Brooks Robinson- The Greatest fielding 3rd Bagger of all time had this line.
    1955-12 chances 2 errors in 6 games, 1 every 6 chances
    1956-36 chances 2 errors in 14 games, 1 every 18 chances
    1957-103 chances with 3 errors in 47 games, an error every 34 chances.
    1958-447 chances with 21 errors in 140 games, an error every 21 times.
    1959-292 chances 13 errors in 87 games, 22.5 times.
    1960-511 chances 12 errors in 152 games. The avg you ask? Try an unreal 42.6 times. It took a while to become a GG.

    Mike Schmidt- Another multiple gold glove winner at the hot corner.
    1972-28 chances 1 error in 11 games, obviously an error every 28 chances
    1973-369 chances 17 errors in 125 games, an error every 21 chances.
    1974-564 chances 26 errors in 162 games, an error every 21 chances.
    1975-524 chances 24 errors in 151 games, an error every 21 chances.
    Talk about consistency wow. However look at the amount of errors in 1 season! He did have better seasons.

    Scott Rolen- Baseball's current Gold standard of glovemen at 3B.
    1996-87 chances 4 errors in 37 games, 1 error every 21 chances.
    1997-459 chances 24 errors in 155 games, 1 every 19 chances
    1998-468 chances 14 errors in 159 games, 1 every 33 chances
    1999-338 chances 14 errors in 112 games, 1 every 25 chances

    Edwin Encarnacion- "The Phenom" (Perhaps)
    2005-180 chances 10 errors in 56 games, 1 in every 18 chances
    2006-95 chances 11 errors in 37 games, 1 in 8 chances
    This year has stunk but we don't know how those other guys performed early in those 1st 2 years so give it until the end of the season.

    The one common theme amongst the GG's is that they took about a year and a half to become solid (Ok maybe not Schmidtty) and 2-4 years to become awesome. EE's '05 season is on par w/ the HOF's early years, yes that's right HOF 3rd baggers. EE isn't neccesarily as elite but he certainly is in the 'hood and we aren't even talking about good 3Bmen were talking the elite. Again it's too early to tell if he's that good just as it's way too early to figure that he's anywhere close to bad. If I'm making the decisions I would at least give him all this year and perhaps even midway through next before making a determination.


    The bad you ask? Too many too list but from all the stats I've seen an excellent 3rd bagger rarely has 25 or more in a season and never 30 or more. The solid ones may have 25-30 at times but never as much as 35. 35 or more and it's time to change positions.
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25